PURPOSE: To compare endovascular therapy (EVT) outcomes to those of bypass surgery (BSG) for infrainguinal artery disease in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 1053 CLI patients (1053 first treated limbs) who underwent BSG (n=230) or EVT (n=823) for de novo infrainguinal lesions between January 2004 and December 2009 at 14 Japanese centers. Propensity score analysis was used for risk adjustment in multivariate analysis and for one-to-one matching (n=200 in each group). Amputation-free survival, overall survival, limb salvage, and freedom from major adverse limb events (any repeat revascularization or major amputation) were calculated. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 30±16 months. In the overall series, there was no significant difference at 3 years between the EVT and BSG groups in amputation-free survival (60.5% vs. 62.1%, p=0.84), limb salvage (88.7% vs. 85.4%, p=0.24), or overall survival (65.8% vs. 69.2%, p=0.40). However, freedom from adverse limb events was significantly lower in the EVT group (56.6% vs. 69.2%, p=0.02) at 3 years. In the matched pairs analysis, there was no significant difference in any outcome between BSG and EVT at 3 years: amputation-free survival 66.3% vs. 62.0 (p=0.44), limb salvage 88.8% vs. 84.8% (p=0.44), survival 73.8% vs. 68.8% (p=0.61), and freedom from adverse limb events 61.3% vs. 69.1% (p=0.27). CONCLUSION: Our cohort suggested that the frequency of serious adverse events after EVT was comparable to that after BSG in CLI patients who underwent their first infrainguinal revascularization.
PURPOSE: To compare endovascular therapy (EVT) outcomes to those of bypass surgery (BSG) for infrainguinal artery disease in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 1053 CLI patients (1053 first treated limbs) who underwent BSG (n=230) or EVT (n=823) for de novo infrainguinal lesions between January 2004 and December 2009 at 14 Japanese centers. Propensity score analysis was used for risk adjustment in multivariate analysis and for one-to-one matching (n=200 in each group). Amputation-free survival, overall survival, limb salvage, and freedom from major adverse limb events (any repeat revascularization or major amputation) were calculated. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 30±16 months. In the overall series, there was no significant difference at 3 years between the EVT and BSG groups in amputation-free survival (60.5% vs. 62.1%, p=0.84), limb salvage (88.7% vs. 85.4%, p=0.24), or overall survival (65.8% vs. 69.2%, p=0.40). However, freedom from adverse limb events was significantly lower in the EVT group (56.6% vs. 69.2%, p=0.02) at 3 years. In the matched pairs analysis, there was no significant difference in any outcome between BSG and EVT at 3 years: amputation-free survival 66.3% vs. 62.0 (p=0.44), limb salvage 88.8% vs. 84.8% (p=0.44), survival 73.8% vs. 68.8% (p=0.61), and freedom from adverse limb events 61.3% vs. 69.1% (p=0.27). CONCLUSION: Our cohort suggested that the frequency of serious adverse events after EVT was comparable to that after BSG in CLI patients who underwent their first infrainguinal revascularization.
Authors: Luke Vierthaler; Peter W Callas; Philip P Goodney; Andres Schanzer; Virenda I Patel; Jack Cronenwett; Daniel J Bertges Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2015-07-26 Impact factor: 4.268