| Literature DB >> 24753863 |
A Rossi1, I Romanello1, L Forzano1, G Fachechi1, D Marchesoni1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: to explore the potential of 3D Power Doppler Angiography (3D PDA) to evaluate the cerebral circulation in normal and growth restricted fetuses (IUGR). STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Growth restricted fetus; brain sparing effect; three dimensional power Doppler angiography
Year: 2011 PMID: 24753863 PMCID: PMC3991450
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Facts Views Vis Obgyn ISSN: 2032-0418
Fig. 1
Fig. 23D-PDA of Zone 1 “Frontal Zone”
Fig. 33D-PDA of Zone 2 “Temporal Zone”
Perinatal outcomes of the study population (Mean (range or standard deviation) or %.
| Control Group | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |
| (AGA n = 51) | (n = 5) | (n = 3) | (n = 9) | |
| Gestational Age (GA) at delivery | 39ws + 1d | 35ws + 0 | 34ws + 5d | 34ws + 4d |
| (37 + 1-41 + 3) | (33 + 1-37 + 2) | (32 + 5-36 + 3) | (32 + 0-36 + 2) | |
| Caesarean Section rate % | 33% (17/51) | 40% (2/5) | 33% (1/3) | 55% (5/9) |
| Pre-eclampsia % | 2% (1/51) | 20% (1/5) | 25% (1/4) | 33% (3/9) |
| Birth weight (mean) | 3342 gr | 1916* gr | 2020* gr | 1767* gr |
| (503) | (99) | (65) | (170) | |
| Apgar score (1/5 min) | 8/9 | 7/8 | 8/8 | 6/9 |
| (1.39/1.92) | (0.89/0.81) | (0.57/0.57) | (1.99/0.48) | |
| NICU admission | 4% (2/51) | 20% (1/5) | 33% (1/3) | 33% (3/9) |
| In utero mortality | 0 | 20% (1/5) | 0 | 0 |
| Neonatal mortality | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perinatal mortality | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
* P < 0,01 vs Control Group (ANOVA).
Three dimensional Power Doppler Angiography parameters values in Zone 1 in the Control Group and Foetuses with Intrauterine Growth Restrictions at different hemodynamic stages (Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3).
| Vascularity Index | Flow Index | Vascular Flow Index | Volume | |
| Control Group | 2.27 (0.3) | 31.96 (7) | 0.73 (0.3) | 32.92 (6.27) |
| Group 1 | 5.53* (2.1) | 24.12 (5.8) | 1.35* (0.6) | 17.25 (4.6) |
| Group 2 | 1.48 (0.25) | 26.6 (5.9) | 0.55 (0.025) | 20.87 (5.6) |
| Group 3 | 2.16 (0.2) | 31.21(6.9) | 0.75 (0.05) | 29 (6.1) |
Mean value and standard deviation of 3DPDA in each Group. Group 1, normal umbilical artery (UA) pulsatily index (PI) and normal middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI; Group 2, abnormal umbilical artery (UA) pulsatily index (PI) (mean > 2 SD) and normal middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI; Group 3 abnormal umbilical artery (UA) pulsatily index (PI) (mean > 2 SD) and abnormal middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI (PI < 2 SD) and pathological ductus venous (DV) PI (mean > 2 SD). AGA, appropriate for gestational age. * P < 0,05 vs Controls (Student’s t-test) and p < 0,05 vs Group 2 and Group 3 (ANOVA)
Three dimensional Power Doppler Angiography vascular parameters values in Zone 2 in the Control Group and Foetuses with Intrauterine Growth Restrictions at different hemodynamic stages (Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3).
| Vascularity Index | Flow Index | Vascular Flow Index | Volume | |
| Control Group | 3.38 (0.6) | 27.67 (5.8) | 1.15 (0.3) | 5.13 (1.2) |
| Group 1 | *0.95 (0.3) | 29.56(7.6) | *0.21 (0.1) | 2.81 (0.7) |
| Group 2 | 4.95 (1.2) | 30.29 (7.7) | 2.10 (0.2)* | 7.10 (2.3)* |
| Group 3 | 5.17 (1.2) | 34.09 (6.3) | 3.5 (0.2)** | 5.21 (1.5) |
Mean value and standard deviation of 3DPDA in each Group. Group 1, normal umbilical artery (UA) pulsatily index (PI) and normal middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI ; Group 2 , abnormal umbilical artery (UA) pulsatily index (PI) (mean > 2 SD) and normal middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI ; Group 3 abnormal umbilical artery (UA) pulsatily index (PI) (mean > 2 SD) and abnormal middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI (PI < 2 SD) and pathological ductus venous (DV) PI (mean > 2 SD).
AGA, appropriate for gestational age.
*P < 0,05 vs Controls (Student’s t-test) and p < 0,05 vs Group 1 and Group 3 (ANOVA).
** P < 0,05 vs Controls (Student’s t-test) and p < 0,05 vs Group 1 and Group 2 (ANOVA)