Literature DB >> 24753629

Conductive shield for ultra-low-field magnetic resonance imaging: Theory and measurements of eddy currents.

Koos C J Zevenhoven, Sarah Busch, Michael Hatridge, Fredrik Oisjöen, Risto J Ilmoniemi, John Clarke.   

Abstract

Eddy currents induced by applied magnetic-field pulses have been a common issue in ultra-low-field magnetic resonance imaging. In particular, a relatively large prepolarizing field-applied before each signal acquisition sequence to increase the signal-induces currents in the walls of the surrounding conductive shielded room. The magnetic-field transient generated by the eddy currents may cause severe image distortions and signal loss, especially with the large prepolarizing coils designed for in vivo imaging. We derive a theory of eddy currents in thin conducting structures and enclosures to provide intuitive understanding and efficient computations. We present detailed measurements of the eddy-current patterns and their time evolution in a previous-generation shielded room. The analysis led to the design and construction of a new shielded room with symmetrically placed 1.6-mm-thick aluminum sheets that were weakly coupled electrically. The currents flowing around the entire room were heavily damped, resulting in a decay time constant of about 6 ms for both the measured and computed field transients. The measured eddy-current vector maps were in excellent agreement with predictions based on the theory, suggesting that both the experimental methods and the theory were successful and could be applied to a wide variety of thin conducting structures.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24753629      PMCID: PMC3977756          DOI: 10.1063/1.4867220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Phys        ISSN: 0021-8979            Impact factor:   2.546


  9 in total

1.  Microtesla MRI with a superconducting quantum interference device.

Authors:  Robert McDermott; SeungKyun Lee; Bennie ten Haken; Andreas H Trabesinger; Alexander Pines; John Clarke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  SQUID-detected MRI at 132 microT with T1-weighted contrast established at 10 microT--300 mT.

Authors:  Seung Kyun Lee; Michael Mössle; Whittier Myers; Nathan Kelso; Andreas H Trabesinger; Alexander Pines; John Clarke
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Rapid polarizing field cycling in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Matter; Greig C Scott; Thomas Grafendorfer; Albert Macovski; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Temperature dependence of relaxation times and temperature mapping in ultra-low-field MRI.

Authors:  Panu T Vesanen; Koos C J Zevenhoven; Jaakko O Nieminen; Juhani Dabek; Lauri T Parkkonen; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Current-density imaging using ultra-low-field MRI with adiabatic pulses.

Authors:  Jaakko O Nieminen; Koos C J Zevenhoven; Panu T Vesanen; Yi-Cheng Hsu; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Avoiding eddy-current problems in ultra-low-field MRI with self-shielded polarizing coils.

Authors:  Jaakko O Nieminen; Panu T Vesanen; Koos C J Zevenhoven; Juhani Dabek; Juha Hassel; Juho Luomahaara; Jari S Penttilä; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Hybrid ultra-low-field MRI and magnetoencephalography system based on a commercial whole-head neuromagnetometer.

Authors:  Panu T Vesanen; Jaakko O Nieminen; Koos C J Zevenhoven; Juhani Dabek; Lauri T Parkkonen; Andrey V Zhdanov; Juho Luomahaara; Juha Hassel; Jari Penttilä; Juha Simola; Antti I Ahonen; Jyrki P Mäkelä; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Current-density imaging using ultra-low-field MRI with zero-field encoding.

Authors:  Panu T Vesanen; Jaakko O Nieminen; Koos C J Zevenhoven; Yi-Cheng Hsu; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 9.  Gradient coil design: a review of methods.

Authors:  R Turner
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.546

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.