Literature DB >> 24753585

Mechanisms of noise robust representation of speech in primary auditory cortex.

Nima Mesgarani1, Stephen V David, Jonathan B Fritz, Shihab A Shamma.   

Abstract

Humans and animals can reliably perceive behaviorally relevant sounds in noisy and reverberant environments, yet the neural mechanisms behind this phenomenon are largely unknown. To understand how neural circuits represent degraded auditory stimuli with additive and reverberant distortions, we compared single-neuron responses in ferret primary auditory cortex to speech and vocalizations in four conditions: clean, additive white and pink (1/f) noise, and reverberation. Despite substantial distortion, responses of neurons to the vocalization signal remained stable, maintaining the same statistical distribution in all conditions. Stimulus spectrograms reconstructed from population responses to the distorted stimuli resembled more the original clean than the distorted signals. To explore mechanisms contributing to this robustness, we simulated neural responses using several spectrotemporal receptive field models that incorporated either a static nonlinearity or subtractive synaptic depression and multiplicative gain normalization. The static model failed to suppress the distortions. A dynamic model incorporating feed-forward synaptic depression could account for the reduction of additive noise, but only the combined model with feedback gain normalization was able to predict the effects across both additive and reverberant conditions. Thus, both mechanisms can contribute to the abilities of humans and animals to extract relevant sounds in diverse noisy environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cortical; hearing; phonemes; population code

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24753585      PMCID: PMC4020083          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1318017111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

1.  Estimating spatio-temporal receptive fields of auditory and visual neurons from their responses to natural stimuli.

Authors:  F E Theunissen; S V David; N C Singh; A Hsu; W E Vinje; J L Gallant
Journal:  Network       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.273

2.  Short-term adaptation of auditory receptive fields to dynamic stimuli.

Authors:  Mark N Kvale; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reading a neural code.

Authors:  W Bialek; F Rieke; R R de Ruyter van Steveninck; D Warland
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat.

Authors:  P X Joris; T C Yin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Redistribution of synaptic efficacy between neocortical pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  H Markram; M Tsodyks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-29       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Linearity and normalization in simple cells of the macaque primary visual cortex.

Authors:  M Carandini; D J Heeger; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Auditory efferents involved in speech-in-noise intelligibility.

Authors:  A L Giraud; S Garnier; C Micheyl; G Lina; A Chays; S Chéry-Croze
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-05-06       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Synaptic depression and cortical gain control.

Authors:  L F Abbott; J A Varela; K Sen; S B Nelson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-01-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The neural code between neocortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability.

Authors:  M V Tsodyks; H Markram
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Spectro-temporal receptive fields of auditory neurons in the grassfrog. III. Analysis of the stimulus-event relation for natural stimuli.

Authors:  A M Aertsen; J H Olders; P I Johannesma
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.086

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Neural Noise Hypothesis of Developmental Dyslexia.

Authors:  Roeland Hancock; Kenneth R Pugh; Fumiko Hoeft
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Robust Neuronal Discrimination in Primary Auditory Cortex Despite Degradations of Spectro-temporal Acoustic Details: Comparison Between Guinea Pigs with Normal Hearing and Mild Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yonane Aushana; Samira Souffi; Jean-Marc Edeline; Christian Lorenzi; Chloé Huetz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-04

3.  Background noise exerts diverse effects on the cortical encoding of foreground sounds.

Authors:  B J Malone; Marc A Heiser; Ralph E Beitel; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Statistics of natural reverberation enable perceptual separation of sound and space.

Authors:  James Traer; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Hearing in noisy environments: noise invariance and contrast gain control.

Authors:  Ben D B Willmore; James E Cooke; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Contribution of spiking activity in the primary auditory cortex to detection in noise.

Authors:  Kate L Christison-Lagay; Sharath Bennur; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Contextual modulation of sound processing in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  C Angeloni; M N Geffen
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 8.  Subcortical pathways: Towards a better understanding of auditory disorders.

Authors:  Richard A Felix; Boris Gourévitch; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  A Framework for Speech Activity Detection Using Adaptive Auditory Receptive Fields.

Authors:  Michael A Carlin; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2015-09-23

10.  Task Engagement Improves Neural Discriminability in the Auditory Midbrain of the Marmoset Monkey.

Authors:  Luke A Shaheen; Sean J Slee; Stephen V David
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.