Literature DB >> 24753351

Improving fragment quality for de novo structure prediction.

Rojan Shrestha1, Kam Y J Zhang.   

Abstract

De novo structure prediction can be defined as a search in conformational space under the guidance of an energy function. The most successful de novo structure prediction methods, such as Rosetta, assemble the fragments from known structures to reduce the search space. Therefore, the fragment quality is an important factor in structure prediction. In our study, a method is proposed to generate a new set of fragments from the lowest energy de novo models. These fragments were subsequently used to predict the next-round of models. In a benchmark of 30 proteins, the new set of fragments showed better performance when used to predict de novo structures. The lowest energy model predicted using our method was closer to native structure than Rosetta for 22 proteins. Following a similar trend, the best model among top five lowest energy models predicted using our method was closer to native structure than Rosetta for 20 proteins. In addition, our experiment showed that the C-alpha root mean square deviation was improved from 5.99 to 5.03 Å on average compared to Rosetta when the lowest energy models were picked as the best predicted models.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fragment assembly; fragment clustering; improved fragments; protein structure prediction; structure-based fragments

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24753351     DOI: 10.1002/prot.24587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of free modeling predictions by RBO aleph in CASP11.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mabrouk; Tim Werner; Michael Schneider; Ines Putz; Oliver Brock
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-11-26

2.  Improved fragment-based protein structure prediction by redesign of search heuristics.

Authors:  Shaun M Kandathil; Mario Garza-Fabre; Julia Handl; Simon C Lovell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Sequential search leads to faster, more efficient fragment-based de novo protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Saulo H P de Oliveira; Eleanor C Law; Jiye Shi; Charlotte M Deane
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Enhancing fragment-based protein structure prediction by customising fragment cardinality according to local secondary structure.

Authors:  Jad Abbass; Jean-Christophe Nebel
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Protein structure prediction using multiple deep neural networks in the 13th Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP13).

Authors:  Andrew W Senior; Richard Evans; John Jumper; James Kirkpatrick; Laurent Sifre; Tim Green; Chongli Qin; Augustin Žídek; Alexander W R Nelson; Alex Bridgland; Hugo Penedones; Stig Petersen; Karen Simonyan; Steve Crossan; Pushmeet Kohli; David T Jones; David Silver; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Demis Hassabis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-12

6.  Toward a detailed understanding of search trajectories in fragment assembly approaches to protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Shaun M Kandathil; Julia Handl; Simon C Lovell
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-02-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.