Literature DB >> 24753237

The Cost-Effectiveness of Measures to Prevent Recurrent Ankle Sprains: Results of a 3-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kasper W Janssen1, Marike R C Hendriks2, Willem van Mechelen1, Evert Verhagen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains are the most common sports-related injury, associated with a high rate of recurrence and societal costs. Recent studies have emphasized the effectiveness of both neuromuscular training and bracing for the secondary prevention of ankle sprains.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the separate and combined use of bracing and neuromuscular training for the prevention of the recurrence of ankle sprains. STUDY
DESIGN: Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: A total of 340 athletes (157 male and 183 female; aged 12-70 years) who had sustained a lateral ankle sprain up to 2 months before inclusion were randomized to a neuromuscular training group (n = 107), brace group (n = 113), and combined intervention group (n = 120). Randomization was stratified by medical treatment of the inclusion sprain. Participants in the neuromuscular training group underwent an 8-week home-based exercise program. Participants in the brace group received a semirigid ankle brace to be worn during all sports activities for a period of 12 months. Participants allocated to the combined group underwent both interventions, with the ankle brace to be worn during all sports activities for a period of 8 weeks. The recurrence of ankle sprains and associated costs were registered during the 1-year follow-up.
RESULTS: There were no differences between groups at baseline with regard to age, sex, sports participation, previous injury, or knowledge of preventive measures. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the brace group in comparison with the combined group was -€2828.30 (approximately--US$3865.00), based on a difference in the mean cost of -€76.16 (approximately--US$104.00) and a difference in the mean effects of 2.68%. The ICER of the neuromuscular training group in comparison with the combined group was €310.08 (approximately US$424.00), based on a difference in the mean cost of -€28.37 (approximately--US$39.00) and a difference in the mean effects of 9.15%.
CONCLUSION: Bracing was found to be the dominant secondary preventive intervention over both neuromuscular training and the combination of both measures.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle brace; ankle sprain; cost-effectiveness; injury prevention; neuromuscular training; randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24753237     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514529642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  9 in total

1.  User Survey of 3 Ankle Braces in Soccer, Volleyball, and Running: Which Brace Fits Best?

Authors:  Kasper Janssen; Anjulie Van Den Berg; Willem Van Mechelen; Evert Verhagen
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  ANKLE JOINT CONTROL DURING SINGLE-LEGGED BALANCE USING COMMON BALANCE TRAINING DEVICES - IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION STRATEGIES.

Authors:  Mark Strøm; Kristian Thorborg; Thomas Bandholm; Lars Tang; Mette Zebis; Kristian Nielsen; Jesper Bencke
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-06

3.  Measuring sports injuries on the pitch: a guide to use in practice.

Authors:  Luiz C Hespanhol Junior; Saulo D Barboza; Willem van Mechelen; Evert Verhagen
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Health economic evaluation in orthotics and prosthetics: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Leigh Clarke; Michael Dillon; Alan Shiell
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-06-27

Review 5.  Acute ankle sprain in athletes: Clinical aspects and algorithmic approach.

Authors:  Farzin Halabchi; Mohammad Hassabi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2020-12-18

6.  Development of a medical device compatible with MRI/CT to measure ankle joint laxity: the Porto Ankle Testing Device.

Authors:  Renato Andrade; Rogério Pereira; Ana Leal; Bruno Pereira; João Paulo Vilas Boas; C Niek van Dijk; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2021-02-11

7.  Combined Effects of Strengthening and Proprioceptive Training on Stability, Balance, and Proprioception Among Subjects with Chronic Ankle Instability in Different Age Groups: Evaluation of Clinical Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Khalid A Alahmari; Venkata Nagaraj Kakaraparthi; Ravi Shankar Reddy; Paul Silvian; Jaya Shanker Tedla; Kanagaraj Rengaramanujam; Irshad Ahmad
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of anterior talofibular ligament in lateral chronic ankle instability ankles pre- and postoperatively.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Hong Li; Yinghui Hua
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Health and Economic Burden of Running-Related Injuries in Dutch Trailrunners: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Luiz Carlos Hespanhol Junior; Willem van Mechelen; Evert Verhagen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.