Literature DB >> 24753003

Effective automated prediction of vertebral column pathologies based on logistic model tree with SMOTE preprocessing.

Esra Mahsereci Karabulut1, Turgay Ibrikci.   

Abstract

This study develops a logistic model tree based automation system based on for accurate recognition of types of vertebral column pathologies. Six biomechanical measures are used for this purpose: pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis angle, sacral slope, pelvic radius and grade of spondylolisthesis. A two-phase classification model is employed in which the first step is preprocessing the data by use of Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE), and the second one is feeding the classifier Logistic Model Tree (LMT) with the preprocessed data. We have achieved an accuracy of 89.73 %, and 0.964 Area Under Curve (AUC) in computer based automatic detection of the pathology. This was validated via a 10-fold-cross-validation experiment conducted on clinical records of 310 patients. The study also presents a comparative analysis of the vertebral column data with the use of several machine learning algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24753003     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-014-0050-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  13 in total

1.  Automatic lumbar vertebral identification using surface-based registration.

Authors:  J L Herring; B M Dawant
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Toward a clinical lumbar CAD: herniation diagnosis.

Authors:  Raja' S Alomari; Jason J Corso; Vipin Chaudhary; Gurmeet Dhillon
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Using machine learning classifiers to assist healthcare-related decisions: classification of electronic patient records.

Authors:  Juliana T Pollettini; Sylvia R G Panico; Julio C Daneluzzi; Renato Tinós; José A Baranauskas; Alessandra A Macedo
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters.

Authors:  Eric Berthonnaud; Joannès Dimnet; Pierre Roussouly; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02

5.  Automatic quantification of spinal curvature in scoliotic radiograph using image processing.

Authors:  Anitha H; G K Prabhu
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Lumbo-pelvic lordosis and the pelvic radius technique in the assessment of spinal sagittal balance: strengths and caveats.

Authors:  I G Sergides; Peter F McCombe; G White; Sabarul Mokhtar; William R Sears
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; João Luiz Pinheiro-Franco
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Random forests ensemble classifier trained with data resampling strategy to improve cardiac arrhythmia diagnosis.

Authors:  Akin Ozçift
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.589

9.  Evaluation of impairment related to low back pain.

Authors:  J R Langworthy
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  3D reconstruction of the lumbar vertebrae from anteroposterior and lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Tristan Whitmarsh; Ludovic Humbert; Luis M Del Río Barquero; Silvana Di Gregorio; Alejandro F Frangi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 8.545

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews.

Authors:  Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-07-09

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence and Computer Aided Diagnosis in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Federico D'Antoni; Fabrizio Russo; Luca Ambrosio; Luca Bacco; Luca Vollero; Gianluca Vadalà; Mario Merone; Rocco Papalia; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Improved Prediction of Preterm Delivery Using Empirical Mode Decomposition Analysis of Uterine Electromyography Signals.

Authors:  Peng Ren; Shuxia Yao; Jingxuan Li; Pedro A Valdes-Sosa; Keith M Kendrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A priori prediction of tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients using quantitative CT and machine learning.

Authors:  Hadi Moghadas-Dastjerdi; Hira Rahman Sha-E-Tallat; Lakshmanan Sannachi; Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews.

Authors:  Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-07-09

6.  Land Subsidence Susceptibility Mapping in South Korea Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Dieu Tien Bui; Himan Shahabi; Ataollah Shirzadi; Kamran Chapi; Biswajeet Pradhan; Wei Chen; Khabat Khosravi; Mahdi Panahi; Baharin Bin Ahmad; Lee Saro
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Machine Learning in Orthopedics: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Federico Cabitza; Angela Locoro; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-27

8.  A Real-Time Artificial Intelligence-Assisted System to Predict Weaning from Ventilator Immediately after Lung Resection Surgery.

Authors:  Ying-Jen Chang; Kuo-Chuan Hung; Li-Kai Wang; Chia-Hung Yu; Chao-Kun Chen; Hung-Tze Tay; Jhi-Joung Wang; Chung-Feng Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.