| Literature DB >> 24752923 |
Carlo Romanò1, Nicola Logoluso1, Lorenzo Drago2, Andrea Peccati1, Delia Romanò1.
Abstract
Irrigation and debridement (I&D) has been described as a possible option to eradicate early postoperative periprosthetic hip and knee infections, as well as late, acute, and hematogenous ones. Still, the literature fails to uniquely assess the effectiveness of this procedure and often provides conflicting evidence. To reconcile this difference, a systematic review of the available literature from 1970 to 2013 was undertaken. Fifteen articles, for a total of 796 patients, met the inclusion criteria; the average success rate was 44.9 and 52% after a single or repeated I&D procedures, respectively, at an average of 4 years follow-up. Despite the methodological differences and the heterogeneity of the material reviewed, this study demonstrates that this procedure only attains a relatively low success rate of infection eradication, depending on when patients are selected for surgical intervention according to the timeframe of their symptoms. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24752923 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1373736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Knee Surg ISSN: 1538-8506 Impact factor: 2.757