Yee Shen Chong1, Melinda Ling Hou Chan, Heng Hao Tan, Sadhana Nadarajah. 1. KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Department of Reproductive Medicine, KKIVF Centre, Basement 1, Women's Tower KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore, Chong.Yee.Shen@kkh.com.sg.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that a modified one-step slow freezing method with higher sucrose concentration (0.2 M) can achieve higher embryo and blastomere survival rates that are comparable to vitrification. However, no study has evaluated the efficacy of a one-step method using commercial slow freezing kit without altering its composition. This retrospective study examines the effects of using 1.5 M PROH with 0.1 M sucrose (F2 medium) alone in a one-step slow freezing method compared to the conventional two-step method. METHODS: Cleavage stage embryos from 526 thaw cycles previously cryopreserved by either the conventional two-step slow freezing method or the modified one-step method were studied. The embryo and blastomere survival rates, cleavage rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The results showed that the embryo survival rate was significantly higher in the modified one-step method compared to the conventional two-step method (86.9 % and 83.1 %, respectively; p = 0.04). Total blastomere survival rate was also significantly increased as a result of the modification (81.0 % versus 76.5 %; p < 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference in the cleavage rates, clinical pregnancy rates (CPR/ET) and live birth rates between the two methods. CONCLUSIONS: Slow freezing using the one-step method is superior to the conventional two-step method in terms of embryo and blastomere survival rates without affecting cleavage rate and clinical outcomes. It can be routinely applied to cleavage stage embryo cryopreservation in IVF centres for greater workflow efficiency.
PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that a modified one-step slow freezing method with higher sucrose concentration (0.2 M) can achieve higher embryo and blastomere survival rates that are comparable to vitrification. However, no study has evaluated the efficacy of a one-step method using commercial slow freezing kit without altering its composition. This retrospective study examines the effects of using 1.5 M PROH with 0.1 M sucrose (F2 medium) alone in a one-step slow freezing method compared to the conventional two-step method. METHODS: Cleavage stage embryos from 526 thaw cycles previously cryopreserved by either the conventional two-step slow freezing method or the modified one-step method were studied. The embryo and blastomere survival rates, cleavage rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The results showed that the embryo survival rate was significantly higher in the modified one-step method compared to the conventional two-step method (86.9 % and 83.1 %, respectively; p = 0.04). Total blastomere survival rate was also significantly increased as a result of the modification (81.0 % versus 76.5 %; p < 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference in the cleavage rates, clinical pregnancy rates (CPR/ET) and live birth rates between the two methods. CONCLUSIONS: Slow freezing using the one-step method is superior to the conventional two-step method in terms of embryo and blastomere survival rates without affecting cleavage rate and clinical outcomes. It can be routinely applied to cleavage stage embryo cryopreservation in IVF centres for greater workflow efficiency.
Authors: R S Tedder; M A Zuckerman; A H Goldstone; A E Hawkins; A Fielding; E M Briggs; D Irwin; S Blair; A M Gorman; K G Patterson Journal: Lancet Date: 1995-07-15 Impact factor: 79.321