Literature DB >> 24752545

Using the landmark method for creating prediction models in large datasets derived from electronic health records.

Brian J Wells1, Kevin M Chagin, Liang Li, Bo Hu, Changhong Yu, Michael W Kattan.   

Abstract

With the integration of electronic health records (EHRs), health data has become easily accessible and abounded. The EHR has the potential to provide important healthcare information to researchers by creating study cohorts. However, accessing this information comes with three major issues: 1) Predictor variables often change over time, 2) Patients have various lengths of follow up within the EHR, and 3) the size of the EHR data can be computationally challenging. Landmark analyses provide a perfect complement to EHR data and help to alleviate these three issues. We present two examples that utilize patient birthdays as landmark times for creating dynamic datasets for predicting clinical outcomes. The use of landmark times help to solve these three issues by incorporating information that changes over time, by creating unbiased reference points that are not related to a patient's exposure within the EHR, and reducing the size of a dataset compared to true time-varying analysis. These techniques are shown using two example cohort studies from the Cleveland Clinic that utilized 4.5 million and 17,787 unique patients, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24752545     DOI: 10.1007/s10729-014-9281-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci        ISSN: 1386-9620


  11 in total

Review 1.  Landmark analysis at the 25-year landmark point.

Authors:  Urania Dafni
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-05

2.  Association of medical noncompliance and long-term adverse outcomes, after myocardial infarction in a minority and uninsured population.

Authors:  Amit P Amin; Ekanka Mukhopadhyay; Sandeep Nathan; Sirikarn Napan; Russell F Kelly
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 7.012

3.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests.

Authors:  F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Pryor; K L Lee; R A Rosati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Shock wave lithotripsy and diabetes mellitus: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Mitra de Cógáin; Amy E Krambeck; Andrew D Rule; Xujian Li; Eric J Bergstralh; Matthew T Gettman; John C Lieske
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Use of electronic medical records differs by specialty and office settings.

Authors:  Erik W J Kokkonen; Scott A Davis; Hsien-Chang Lin; Tushar S Dabade; Steven R Feldman; Alan B Fleischer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Analysis of survival by tumor response.

Authors:  J R Anderson; K C Cain; R D Gelber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Statistical methods for predicting mortality in patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Bryan Cai; Arash Bedayat; Kanako K Kumamaru; Elizabeth George; Karin E Dill; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Strategies for handling missing data in electronic health record derived data.

Authors:  Brian J Wells; Kevin M Chagin; Amy S Nowacki; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2013-12-17

10.  Prediction of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Brian J Wells; Rachel Roth; Amy S Nowacki; Susana Arrigain; Changhong Yu; Wayne A Rosenkrans; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  5 in total

1.  Foreward to special issue on health analytics.

Authors:  Farrokh Alemi
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2014-10-09

2.  A comparison of risk prediction methods using repeated observations: an application to electronic health records for hemodialysis.

Authors:  Benjamin A Goldstein; Gina Maria Pomann; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Michael J Pencina
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence in glomerular diseases.

Authors:  Francesco P Schena; Riccardo Magistroni; Fedelucio Narducci; Daniela I Abbrescia; Vito W Anelli; Tommaso Di Noia
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.651

4.  Longitudinal Risk Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease in Diabetic Patients Using a Temporal-Enhanced Gradient Boosting Machine: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yong Hu; Mei Liu; Xing Song; Lemuel R Waitman; Alan Sl Yu; David C Robbins
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2020-01-31

5.  Landmark Models for Optimizing the Use of Repeated Measurements of Risk Factors in Electronic Health Records to Predict Future Disease Risk.

Authors:  Ellie Paige; Jessica Barrett; David Stevens; Ruth H Keogh; Michael J Sweeting; Irwin Nazareth; Irene Petersen; Angela M Wood
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.