Literature DB >> 24751319

Both body weight and BMI predicts improvement in symptom and functioning for patients with major depressive disorder.

Ching-Hua Lin1, Cheng-Chung Chen1, Julielynn Wong2, Roger S McIntyre3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity has shown a positive association with depression. We aimed to investigate the relationships among body weight, body mass index (BMI=kg/m(2)), change in a depression rating scale, and change in a functional scale with fluoxetine treatment for hospitalized patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).
METHODS: A total of 131 acutely ill inpatients with MDD were enrolled to receive 20mg of fluoxetine daily for 6 weeks. The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) for symptom and the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) for functioning were assessed at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6. Remission was defined as a score of≤7 on the HAMD-17 at endpoint. Body weight, body length, and BMI were measured at baseline. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated among body weight, BMI, HAMD-17 score change, and WSAS score change.
RESULTS: Of the 131 participants, 126 (96.2%) had at least one post-baseline assessment and were included in the analysis. Significant differences in body weight and BMI existed between remitters and nonremitters. There were statistically significant relationships among baseline body weight, baseline BMI, HAMD-17 score change, and WSAS score change at end point. LIMITATIONS: This is a short-term trial with relatively small sample size.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonremitters had greater body weight and BMI before treatment. Increased body weight and BMI is correlated with the decreased improvement in symptom and functioning at end point. Depression and obesity should be treated concurrently to optimize clinical outcomes for the treatment of depression.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  17-item hamilton depression rating scale; Body mass index; Body weight; Major depressive disorder; Work and social adjustment scale

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24751319     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.02.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  7 in total

1.  Antidepressant use and circulating prolactin levels.

Authors:  Katherine W Reeves; Olivia I Okereke; Jing Qian; Shelley S Tworoger; Megan S Rice; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  High-fat diet-induced metabolic disorders impairs 5-HT function and anxiety-like behavior in mice.

Authors:  Juliane Zemdegs; Gaël Quesseveur; David Jarriault; Luc Pénicaud; Xavier Fioramonti; Bruno P Guiard
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Patient-reported functioning in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Waguih William IsHak; David M James; James Mirocha; Haidy Youssef; Gabriel Tobia; Sarah Pi; Katherine L Collison; Robert M Cohen
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  A Post Hoc Analysis of the Effect of Weight on Efficacy in Depressed Patients Treated With Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d and 100 mg/d.

Authors:  Roger S McIntyre; Rana S Fayyad; Christine J Guico-Pabia; Matthieu Boucher
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2015-06-04

5.  High-fat diet induces neuroinflammation and reduces the serotonergic response to escitalopram in the hippocampus of obese rats.

Authors:  Melinda Hersey; Jennifer L Woodruff; Nicholas Maxwell; Alia T Sadek; Maria K Bykalo; Ian Bain; Claudia A Grillo; Gerardo G Piroli; Parastoo Hashemi; Lawrence P Reagan
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 19.227

6.  Personalized Psychiatry and Depression: The Role of Sociodemographic and Clinical Variables.

Authors:  Giampaolo Perna; Alessandra Alciati; Silvia Daccò; Massimiliano Grassi; Daniela Caldirola
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.505

7.  Novel insights into the consequences of obesity: a phenotype-wide Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Liying Wang; Qing Wang; Peng Chen; Chang He; Miaoran Zhang; Jiuling Li; Yiqing Wang; Lanlan Chen; Baiyu Qi; Jianping Wen; Jianli Yang; Sitong Lin; Dianyuan Liu; Ying Dong
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 5.351

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.