Literature DB >> 24751191

Evidence for unapparent Brucella canis infections among adults with occupational exposure to dogs.

W S Krueger1, N E Lucero, A Brower, G L Heil, G C Gray.   

Abstract

Human serological assays designed to detect brucellosis will miss infections caused by Brucella canis, and low levels of periodic bacteremia limit diagnosis by blood culture. Recent B. canis outbreaks in dogs and concomitant illnesses in caretakers suggest that unapparent human infections may be occurring. With more than a quarter of a million persons in occupations involving dogs, and nearly 80 million dog owners in the United States, this pathogen is an under-recognized human health threat. To investigate occupational exposure to B. canis, we adapted a commercial canine serological assay and present the first controlled seroepidemiological study of human B. canis infections in recent years. 306 adults with occupational exposure to dogs and 101 non-matched, non-canine-exposed subjects were enrolled. Antibodies were detected using the canine D-Tec(®) CB rapid slide agglutination test (RSAT) kit with a secondary 2-mercaptoethanol (ME)-RSAT. Results were validated on a blinded subset of sera with an additional RSAT and indirect enzyme-linked immunoassay at the National Administration of Laboratories and Health Institutes (ANLIS) in Argentina. Seroprevalence ranged from 10.8% (RSAT) to 3.6% (ME-RSAT) among canine-exposed subjects. Kennel employees were more likely to test RSAT seropositive compared with other canine exposures (OR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3-5.8); however, low seroprevalence limited meaningful occupational risk factor analyses. Two seropositive participants reported experiencing symptoms consistent with brucellosis and having exposure to B. canis-infected dogs; however, temporality of symptom onset with reported exposure could not be determined. D-Tec(®) CB results had substantial agreement with ANLIS assays (Cohen's kappa = 0.60-0.68). These data add to a growing body of literature suggesting that people occupationally exposed to dogs may be at risk of unapparent B. canis infection. It seems prudent to consider B. canis as an occupational public health concern and encourage the development of serological assays to detect human B. canis infections.
© 2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brucellosis; communicable diseases; emerging; occupational exposure; seroepidemiologic studies; zoonoses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24751191     DOI: 10.1111/zph.12102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  10 in total

1.  Brucella canis is an intracellular pathogen that induces a lower proinflammatory response than smooth zoonotic counterparts.

Authors:  Carlos Chacón-Díaz; Pamela Altamirano-Silva; Gabriela González-Espinoza; María-Concepción Medina; Alejandro Alfaro-Alarcón; Laura Bouza-Mora; César Jiménez-Rojas; Melissa Wong; Elías Barquero-Calvo; Norman Rojas; Caterina Guzmán-Verri; Edgardo Moreno; Esteban Chaves-Olarte
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Detection of Brucella spp. in dogs at Pantanal wetlands.

Authors:  Ana Laura Bello de Oliveira; Gabriel Carvalho de Macedo; Gracia Maria Soares Rosinha; Jhessyca Leal Melgarejo; Andreza Gabriela Leão Alves; Wanessa Teixeira Gomes Barreto; Filipe Martins Santos; João Bosco Vilela Campos; Heitor Miraglia Herrera; Carina Elisei de Oliveira
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.476

3.  Chronic Brucellosis in Japan.

Authors:  Naoki Kawakami; Yoko Wakai; Kazuhito Saito; Koichi Imaoka
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 1.271

4.  Identification of Dendritic Cell Maturation, TLR, and TREM1 Signaling Pathways in the Brucella canis Infected Canine Macrophage Cells, DH82, Through Transcriptomic Analysis.

Authors:  Woo Bin Park; Suji Kim; Soojin Shim; Han Sang Yoo
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-03-19

5.  Genotyping Brucella canis isolates using a highly discriminatory multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) assay.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Yin Wang; Elizabeth Poulsen; Russell Ransburgh; Xuming Liu; Baoyan An; Nanyan Lu; Gary Anderson; Chengming Wang; Jianfa Bai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Tissue distribution and cell tropism of Brucella canis in naturally infected canine foetuses and neonates.

Authors:  Tayse Domingues de Souza; Tatiane Furtado de Carvalho; Juliana Pinto da Silva Mol; João Vítor Menezes Lopes; Monique Ferreira Silva; Tatiane Alves da Paixão; Renato Lima Santos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Brucellosis in Dogs and Public Health Risk.

Authors:  Martha E Hensel; Maria Negron; Angela M Arenas-Gamboa
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Brucella ovis mutant in ABC transporter protects against Brucella canis infection in mice and it is safe for dogs.

Authors:  Camila Eckstein; Juliana P S Mol; Fabíola B Costa; Philipe P Nunes; Pâmela A Lima; Marília M Melo; Thaynara P Carvalho; Daniel O Santos; Monique F Silva; Tatiane F Carvalho; Luciana F Costa; Otoni A O Melo Júnior; Rodolfo C Giunchette; Tatiane A Paixão; Renato L Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Diagnosis of canine brucellosis: comparison of various serologic tests and PCR.

Authors:  Juliana P S Mol; Andressa C B Guedes; Camila Eckstein; Amanda P N Quintal; Tayse D Souza; Luis A Mathias; João Paulo A Haddad; Tatiane A Paixão; Renato L Santos
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 1.279

10.  Seroprevalence of Brucella canis in canines from a dog shelter in Bogotá, Colombia

Authors:  Astrid-Jullieth Laverde; Daniela Restrepo-Botero; Diego Hernández-Pulido; José Luis Rodríguez-Bautista; Isabel-Sofía Sandoval
Journal:  Biomedica       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 0.935

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.