Literature DB >> 24751183

Concordance of Shape Risk Scale, a new pressure ulcer risk tool, with Braden Scale.

Esa T Soppi1, Ansa K Iivanainen, Pasi A Korhonen.   

Abstract

The occurrence of pressure ulcers was examined in a cross-sectional study in 23 health care facilities and in home care involving 548 patients. The screening of pressure ulcer risk was assessed simultaneously using the Braden Scale and the new Shape Risk Scale (SRS), and the results were compared. The overall prevalence of pressure ulcers in the study population was 15·5% (85/548). The Braden Scale was performed as described in the literature. The direct concordance of the Braden and SRS scales was 46%. In more than 90% of cases, the SRS classified patients as well as or better than the Braden Scale. The SRS allocates patients significantly different from the Braden Scale into the risk categories, especially the difference is significant between the low and medium-risk categories. The greatest advantage of SRS to Braden Scale is that it correctly identifies patients with low risk of pressure ulcers. It is interesting that the two risk scores, taking into consideration the basically different pathophysiological factors, can still give rather similar results. The users considered that both scales are easy to use.
© 2012 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2012 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Braden; Pressure ulcer; Prevalence; Risk tool; Shape Risk Scale

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 24751183      PMCID: PMC7950517          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  8 in total

Review 1.  Proinflammatory cytokines.

Authors:  C A Dinarello
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Obesity's role in heart disease requires apples and pears comparison.

Authors:  Mike Mitka
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pedro L Pancorbo-Hidalgo; Francisco Pedro Garcia-Fernandez; Isabel Ma Lopez-Medina; Carmen Alvarez-Nieto
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 4.  The resource impact of wounds on health-care providers in Europe.

Authors:  J Posnett; F Gottrup; H Lundgren; G Saal
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.072

5.  The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.

Authors:  N Bergstrom; B J Braden; A Laguzza; V Holman
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Results of nine international pressure ulcer prevalence surveys: 1989 to 2005.

Authors:  Catherine Vangilder; Gordon D Macfarlane; Stephanie Meyer
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 7.  Body mass index, weight, and pressure ulcer prevalence: an analysis of the 2006-2007 International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Surveys.

Authors:  Catherine VanGilder; Gordon MacFarlane; Stephanie Meyer; Charlie Lachenbruch
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.597

8.  Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies.

Authors:  Gary Whitlock; Sarah Lewington; Paul Sherliker; Robert Clarke; Jonathan Emberson; Jim Halsey; Nawab Qizilbash; Rory Collins; Richard Peto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Validation of the Helsinki University Hospital prevent pressure Injury Risk Assessment Tool: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Anniina Heikkilä; Jaana Kotila; Kristiina Junttila
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-01-17

2.  Pressure injury prevalence and incidence in acute inpatient care and related risk factors: A cross-sectional national study.

Authors:  Tarja Anita Tervo-Heikkinen; Anniina Heikkilä; Marita Koivunen; Tiina-Riitta Kortteisto; Jaana Peltokoski; Susanne Salmela; Merja Sankelo; Tuija Sinikka Ylitörmänen; Kristiina Junttila
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.099

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.