| Literature DB >> 24751144 |
Zhen Liu, Xiaobin Long, Cheng Chao, Chen Yan, Qiangyun Wu, Shengni Hua, Yajie Zhang1, Aibing Wu, Weiyi Fang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CDK4 is a protein kinase in the CDK family important for G1/S phase cell cycle progression. However, the roles and molecular mechanisms of CDK4 triggering nasopharynx carcinogenesis are still unclear.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24751144 PMCID: PMC4014407 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-274
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
CDK4 is highly expressed in NPC tissues compared to NPs
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Expression level | NPs | NPCs | P = 0.001 |
| Low | 26 | 58 | |
| High | 8 | 75 | |
| Total | 34 | 133 | |
Figure 1Stably knocking down CDK4 expression suppresses cell proliferation and cell cycle progression in vitro in NPC. A. CDK4 protein expression was stably suppressed by lentivirus-mediated shRNA in NPC cells. B. In vitro viability of NPC cells was decreased in CDK4-suppressed cells compared to PLV-Ctr cells by MTT assay. C. In vitro proliferative ability of NPC cells was significantly decreased in CDK4-suppressed cells compared to PLV-Ctr cells by colony formation assay. D. Stably downregulated CDK4 expression blocked cell cycle transition from G1 to S in shRNA-CDK4-2 and 3 cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD for three independent experiments (*p < 0.05).
Figure 2Repression of CDK4 elevates expression of let-7c by modulating G1/S cell cycle signaling in NPC. A. Let-7c expression was significantly increased in NPC cells after stable knockown of CDK4 expression. B. Knocking down the expression of CDK4 decreased the CCND1, CDK6, and E2F1 as well as activated p21 expression. C. E2F1 expression was markedly suppressed using specific siRNA-E2F1. D. Knocking down E2F1 by specific siRNA-E2F1 elevated the expression of let-7c.
Figure 3Let-7c is downregulated and suppressed cell growth and cell cycle progression. A. Compared to NP tissues, let-7c expression was reduced in NPC tissues. B. Let-7c mimics or its inhibitor respectively suppressed or promoted cell growth. C. Let-7c mimics or its inhibitor respectively suppressed or promoted G1 to S phase cell cycle progression.
Figure 4Let-7c modulates cell cycle signaling. Let-7c mimics elevated p15 and p16 expression and decreased and the expression of CDK4 and E2F1 while its inhibitor had the opposite effect.
Figure 5Overexpressed CDK4 and non-treatment of radiotherapy are associated with poor prognosis of NPC. A. CDK4 was expressed in NPC and NP tissues. a,b, and c: Weak cytoplasmic expression of CDK4 in NP tissues. d: High cytoplasmic expression of CDK4 in NP tissue. e: High cytoplasmic expression of CDK4 in NPC tissues. f and g: High cytoplasmic expression but low nuclear expression of CDK4 in NPC tissues. h: High cytoplasmic and nuclear coexpression of CDK4 in NPC tissues. B. Overexpressed CDK4 was associated with poor prognosis of NPC.
Correlation between the clinicopathologic characteristics and expression of CDK4 protein in NPC
| Gender | | | | |
| Male | 92 | 41 | 51 | |
| Female | 41 | 17 | 24 | 0.850 |
| Age(y) | | | | |
| ≥50 | 67 | 29 | 38 | |
| <66 | 66 | 29 | 37 | 1.000 |
| Smoking | | | | |
| No | 111 | 50 | 61 | |
| Yes | 22 | 8 | 14 | 0.490 |
| T classification | | | | |
| T1-T2 | 99 | 41 | 58 | |
| T3-T4 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0.426 |
| N classification | | | | |
| N0-N1 | 74 | 30 | 44 | |
| N2-N3 | 59 | 28 | 31 | 0.483 |
| Distant metastasis | | | | |
| Yes | 10 | 3 | 7 | |
| No | 123 | 55 | 68 | 0.512 |
| TNM Clinical stage | | | | |
| I~II | 50 | 16 | 34 | |
| III~IV | 83 | 42 | 41 | 0.047 |
Summary of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of overall survival duration
| Gender | | | | | | |
| Male vs. female | 0.583 | 1.176 | 0.660-2.097 | 0.930 | 1.027 | 0.560-1.885 |
| Age | | | | | | |
| ≥50vs. <50 years | 0.352 | 1.281 | 0.760-2.159 | 0.933 | 0.977 | 0.568-1.680 |
| Family tumor history | | | | | | |
| Yes vs. No | 0.970 | 1.022 | 0.319-3.273 | 0.917 | 0.940 | 0.289-3.052 |
| Smoking | | | | | | |
| Yes vs. No | 0.979 | 1.010 | 0.495-2.060 | 0.452 | 1.340 | 0.625-2.876 |
| Chemotherapy | | | | | | |
| Yes vs. No | 0.585 | 1.220 | 0.598-2.489 | 0.709 | 1.171 | 0.512-2.679 |
| Radiotherapy | | | | | | |
| Yes vs. No | 0.002 | 0.308 | 0.145-0.654 | 0.009 | 0.280 | 0.108-0.727 |
| T classification | | | | | | |
| T1-T2 vs. T3-T4 | 0.000 | 2.611 | 1.533-4.446 | | | |
| N classification | | | | | | |
| N0-N1 vs. N2--N3 | 0.002 | 2.317 | 1.367-3.927 | | | |
| M classification | | | | | | |
| M0 vs. M1 | 0.000 | 7.280 | 3.519-15.061 | | | |
| Clinical stage | | | | | | |
| I-II vs. III-IV | 0.000 | 5.222 | 2.467-11.054 | 0.000 | 4.527 | 2.041-10.042 |
| Expression of CDK4 | | | | | | |
| High expression vs. low expression | 0.099 | 1.554 | 0.920-2.626 | 0.087 | 1.671 | 0.928-3.008 |