Literature DB >> 24750425

Molecular cytogenetic characterisation and phylogenetic analysis of the seven cultivated Vigna species (Fabaceae).

C-W She1, X-H Jiang, L-J Ou, J Liu, K-L Long, L-H Zhang, W-T Duan, W Zhao, J-C Hu.   

Abstract

The genomic organisation of the seven cultivated Vigna species, V. unguiculata, V. subterranea, V. angularis, V. umbellata, V. radiata, V. mungo and V. aconitifolia, was determined using sequential combined PI and DAPI (CPD) staining and dual-colour fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with 5S and 45S rDNA probes. For phylogenetic analyses, comparative genomic in situ hybridisation (cGISH) onto somatic chromosomes and sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of 45S rDNA were used. Quantitative karyotypes were established using chromosome measurements, fluorochrome bands and rDNA FISH signals. All species had symmetrical karyotypes composed of only metacentric or metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes. Distinct heterochromatin differentiation was revealed by CPD staining and DAPI counterstaining after FISH. The rDNA sites among all species differed in their number, location and size. cGISH of V. umbellata genomic DNA to the chromosomes of all species produced strong signals in all centromeric regions of V. umbellata and V. angularis, weak signals in all pericentromeric regions of V. aconitifolia, and CPD-banded proximal regions of V. mungo var. mungo. Molecular phylogenetic trees showed that V. angularis and V. umbellata were the closest relatives, and V. mungo and V. aconitifolia were relatively closely related; these species formed a group that was separated from another group comprising V. radiata, V. unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis and V. subterranea. This result was consistent with the phylogenetic relationships inferred from the heterochromatin and cGISH patterns; thus, fluorochrome banding and cGISH are efficient tools for the phylogenetic analysis of Vigna species.
© 2014 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluorochrome banding; Vigna cultivars; in situ hybridisation; internal transcribed spacers; karyotype; phylogeny; ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24750425     DOI: 10.1111/plb.12174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)        ISSN: 1435-8603            Impact factor:   3.081


  9 in total

1.  Five Fabaceae Karyotype and Phylogenetic Relationship Analysis Based on Oligo-FISH for 5S rDNA and (AG3T3)3.

Authors:  Zhoujian He; Wei Zhang; Xiaomei Luo; Jie Huan
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.141

2.  Breaks of macrosynteny and collinearity among moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia), cowpea (V. unguiculata), and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris).

Authors:  Ana Rafaela da S Oliveira; Lívia do Vale Martins; Fernanda de O Bustamante; María Muñoz-Amatriaín; Timothy Close; Antônio F da Costa; Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon; Andrea Pedrosa-Harand; Ana Christina Brasileiro-Vidal
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Karyotypic evolution of the Medicago complex: sativa-caerulea-falcata inferred from comparative cytogenetic analysis.

Authors:  Feng Yu; Haiqing Wang; Yanyan Zhao; Ruijuan Liu; Quanwen Dou; Jiangli Dong; Tao Wang
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Molecular cytogenetic characterization and phylogenetic analysis of four Miscanthus species (Poaceae).

Authors:  Yan-Mei Tang; Liang Xiao; Yasir Iqbal; Jian-Feng Liao; Long-Qian Xiao; Zi-Li Yi; Chao-Wen She
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 1.800

5.  Low cytomolecular diversification in the genus Stylosanthes Sw. (Papilionoideae, Leguminosae).

Authors:  Ana Luiza Franco; Amanda Figueredo; Lívia de Moraes Pereira; Saulo Marçal de Sousa; Gustavo Souza; Marcelo Ayres Carvalho; Marcelo F Simon; Lyderson Facio Viccini
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 1.771

6.  The genome of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.).

Authors:  Stefano Lonardi; María Muñoz-Amatriaín; Qihua Liang; Shengqiang Shu; Steve I Wanamaker; Sassoum Lo; Jaakko Tanskanen; Alan H Schulman; Tingting Zhu; Ming-Cheng Luo; Hind Alhakami; Rachid Ounit; Abid Md Hasan; Jerome Verdier; Philip A Roberts; Jansen R P Santos; Arsenio Ndeve; Jaroslav Doležel; Jan Vrána; Samuel A Hokin; Andrew D Farmer; Steven B Cannon; Timothy J Close
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 7.  Unraveling Origin, History, Genetics, and Strategies for Accelerated Domestication and Diversification of Food Legumes.

Authors:  Muraleedhar S Aski; Aladdin Hamwieh; Akshay Talukdar; Santosh Kumar Gupta; Brij Bihari Sharma; Rekha Joshi; H D Upadhyaya; Kuldeep Singh; Rajendra Kumar
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  A First Glimpse of Wild Lupin Karyotype Variation As Revealed by Comparative Cytogenetic Mapping.

Authors:  Karolina Susek; Wojciech K Bielski; Robert Hasterok; Barbara Naganowska; Bogdan Wolko
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Molecular cytogenetic characterization and comparison of the two cultivated Canavalia species (Fabaceae).

Authors:  Chao-Wen She; Lin Wei; Xiang-Hui Jiang
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 1.800

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.