AIM: Social oocyte freezing has gained increasing interest worldwide. We conducted a cross-sectional survey on 129 female medical students in Singapore to assess their mindset and attitudes toward fertility and social oocyte freezing. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was conducted among female medical students in Singapore. The desired sample size was 100 participants. Their awareness of the existence of social oocyte freezing was first assessed. An information leaflet was provided subsequently, followed by a more detailed questionnaire. The questions focused on their awareness of age-related fertility decline and their intentions for social oocyte freezing if made available. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine female students participated in the electronic survey, of whom 36.4% had heard of social oocyte freezing. Of these, 70% had personally considered taking up this option. However, after reading the information leaflet, only 48.9% would still consider this option. Of the total, 89.9% considered themselves too old for pregnancy after the age of 35 years, 37.2% would delay family planning for their career, 45.7% would consider social oocyte freezing to postpone family planning for their career, 46.5% would consider oocyte freezing if they had no suitable partners yet, 50.4% may consider freezing their eggs after the age of 30 years and 71.3% may be more amenable to oocyte freezing if government subsidy is available. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that social oocyte freezing may be a viable option for single young women who wish to delay child-bearing for 'reproductive insurance', so long as this is done with appropriate informed consent with non-directive counseling.
AIM: Social oocyte freezing has gained increasing interest worldwide. We conducted a cross-sectional survey on 129 female medical students in Singapore to assess their mindset and attitudes toward fertility and social oocyte freezing. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was conducted among female medical students in Singapore. The desired sample size was 100 participants. Their awareness of the existence of social oocyte freezing was first assessed. An information leaflet was provided subsequently, followed by a more detailed questionnaire. The questions focused on their awareness of age-related fertility decline and their intentions for social oocyte freezing if made available. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine female students participated in the electronic survey, of whom 36.4% had heard of social oocyte freezing. Of these, 70% had personally considered taking up this option. However, after reading the information leaflet, only 48.9% would still consider this option. Of the total, 89.9% considered themselves too old for pregnancy after the age of 35 years, 37.2% would delay family planning for their career, 45.7% would consider social oocyte freezing to postpone family planning for their career, 46.5% would consider oocyte freezing if they had no suitable partners yet, 50.4% may consider freezing their eggs after the age of 30 years and 71.3% may be more amenable to oocyte freezing if government subsidy is available. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that social oocyte freezing may be a viable option for single young women who wish to delay child-bearing for 'reproductive insurance', so long as this is done with appropriate informed consent with non-directive counseling.
Authors: Deborah E Ikhena-Abel; Rafael Confino; Nirali J Shah; Angela K Lawson; Susan C Klock; Jared C Robins; Mary Ellen Pavone Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2017-06-02 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Alma Linkeviciute; Fedro A Peccatori; Virginia Sanchini; Giovanni Boniolo Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Rani Fritz; Susan Klugman; Harry Lieman; Jay Schulkin; Laura Taouk; Neko Castleberry; Erkan Buyuk Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 3.412