Randi Ballangrud1, Marie Louise Hall-Lord, Birgitta Hedelin, Mona Persenius. 1. R Ballangrud, Doctoral Student, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, Sweden, and Assistant Professor, MSc, RNT, RNCCN, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Care and Nursing, Gjøvik University College, Norway.
Abstract
AIM: To implement a simulation-based team training programme and to investigate intensive care nurses' evaluations of simulation used for team training. BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training is recommended to make health care professionals aware of and understand the importance of teamwork related to patient safety. DESIGN: The study was based on a questionnaire evaluation design. METHODS: A total of 63 registered nurses were recruited: 53 from seven intensive care units in four hospitals in one hospital trust and 10 from an intensive care postgraduate education programme. After conducting a simulation-based team training programme with two scenarios related to emergency situations in the intensive care, the participants evaluated each simulation activity with regard to: (i) outcome of satisfaction and self-confidence in learning, (ii) implementation of educational practice and (iii) simulation design/development. RESULT: Intensive care nurses were highly satisfied with their simulation-based learning, and they were mostly in agreement with the statements about self-confidence in learning. They were generally positive in their evaluation of the implementation of the educational practice and the simulation design/development. Significant differences were found with regard to scenario roles, prior simulation experience and area of intensive care practice. CONCLUSION: The study indicates a positive reception of a simulation-based programme with regard to team training in emergency situations in an intensive care unit. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings may motivate and facilitate the use of simulation for team training to promote patient safety in intensive care and provide educators with support to develop and improve simulation-based training programmes.
AIM: To implement a simulation-based team training programme and to investigate intensive care nurses' evaluations of simulation used for team training. BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training is recommended to make health care professionals aware of and understand the importance of teamwork related to patient safety. DESIGN: The study was based on a questionnaire evaluation design. METHODS: A total of 63 registered nurses were recruited: 53 from seven intensive care units in four hospitals in one hospital trust and 10 from an intensive care postgraduate education programme. After conducting a simulation-based team training programme with two scenarios related to emergency situations in the intensive care, the participants evaluated each simulation activity with regard to: (i) outcome of satisfaction and self-confidence in learning, (ii) implementation of educational practice and (iii) simulation design/development. RESULT: Intensive care nurses were highly satisfied with their simulation-based learning, and they were mostly in agreement with the statements about self-confidence in learning. They were generally positive in their evaluation of the implementation of the educational practice and the simulation design/development. Significant differences were found with regard to scenario roles, prior simulation experience and area of intensive care practice. CONCLUSION: The study indicates a positive reception of a simulation-based programme with regard to team training in emergency situations in an intensive care unit. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings may motivate and facilitate the use of simulation for team training to promote patient safety in intensive care and provide educators with support to develop and improve simulation-based training programmes.
Authors: Priscila Giraldo; Luke Sato; Jose M Martínez-Sánchez; Mercè Comas; Kathy Dwyer; Maria Sala; Xavier Castells Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 2.692