AIMS: This study aimed to describe lamivudine pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired renal function and to evaluate the consistency of current dosing recommendations. METHODS: A total of 244 patients, ranging in age from 18 to 79 years (median 40 years) and in bodyweight from 38 to 117 kg (median 71 kg), with 344 lamivudine plasma concentrations, were analysed using a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Serum creatinine clearance (CLCR) was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula; 177 patients had normal renal function (CLCR > 90 ml min(-1) ), 50 patients had mild renal impairment (CLCR = 60-90 ml min(-1) ), 20 patients had moderate renal impairment (CLCR = 30-60 ml min(-1) ), and five patients had severe renal impairment (CLCR < 30 ml min(-1) ). RESULTS: A two-compartment model adequately described the data. Typical population estimates (percentage interindividual variability) of the apparent clearance (CL/F), central (Vc /F) and peripheral volumes of distribution (Vp /F), intercompartmental clearance (Q/F) and absorption rate constant (Ka ) were 29.7 l h(-1) (32%), 68.2 l, 114 l, 10.1 l h(-1) (85%) and 1 h(-1) , respectively. Clearance increased significantly and gradually with CLCR. Our simulations showed that a dose of 300 mg day(-1) in patients with mild renal impairment could overexpose them. A dose of 200 mg day(-1) maintained an exposure close to that of adults with normal renal function. However, the current US Food and Drug Administration recommendations for lamivudine in other categories of patients (from severe to moderate renal impairment) provided optimal exposures. CONCLUSIONS: Lamivudine elimination clearance is related to renal function. To provide optimal exposure, patients with mild renal impairment should receive 200 mg day(-1) instead of 300 mg day(-1) .
AIMS: This study aimed to describe lamivudine pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired renal function and to evaluate the consistency of current dosing recommendations. METHODS: A total of 244 patients, ranging in age from 18 to 79 years (median 40 years) and in bodyweight from 38 to 117 kg (median 71 kg), with 344 lamivudine plasma concentrations, were analysed using a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Serum creatinine clearance (CLCR) was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula; 177 patients had normal renal function (CLCR > 90 ml min(-1) ), 50 patients had mild renal impairment (CLCR = 60-90 ml min(-1) ), 20 patients had moderate renal impairment (CLCR = 30-60 ml min(-1) ), and five patients had severe renal impairment (CLCR < 30 ml min(-1) ). RESULTS: A two-compartment model adequately described the data. Typical population estimates (percentage interindividual variability) of the apparent clearance (CL/F), central (Vc /F) and peripheral volumes of distribution (Vp /F), intercompartmental clearance (Q/F) and absorption rate constant (Ka ) were 29.7 l h(-1) (32%), 68.2 l, 114 l, 10.1 l h(-1) (85%) and 1 h(-1) , respectively. Clearance increased significantly and gradually with CLCR. Our simulations showed that a dose of 300 mg day(-1) in patients with mild renal impairment could overexpose them. A dose of 200 mg day(-1) maintained an exposure close to that of adults with normal renal function. However, the current US Food and Drug Administration recommendations for lamivudine in other categories of patients (from severe to moderate renal impairment) provided optimal exposures. CONCLUSIONS:Lamivudine elimination clearance is related to renal function. To provide optimal exposure, patients with mild renal impairment should receive 200 mg day(-1) instead of 300 mg day(-1) .
Authors: R Bruno; M B Regazzi; V Ciappina; P Villani; P Sacchi; M Montagna; R Panebianco; G Filice Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2001 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: B U Mueller; L L Lewis; G J Yuen; M Farley; A Keller; J A Church; J C Goldsmith; D J Venzon; M Rubin; P A Pizzo; F M Balis Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: F Bonnet; M Bonarek; P Morlat; P Mercié; M Dupon; M C Gemain; D Malvy; N Bernard; J L Pellegrin; J Beylot Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2003-05-02 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: M A Johnson; G A Verpooten; M J Daniel; R Plumb; J Moss; D Van Caesbroeck; M E De Broe Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Briann Fischetti; Kushal Shah; David R Taft; Leonard Berkowitz; Anjali Bakshi; Agnes Cha Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 3.835