Literature DB >> 24750060

Gene patents, patenting life and the impact of court rulings on US stem cell patents and research.

Kirstin R W Matthews1, Maude L Cuchiara.   

Abstract

In June 2013, the US Supreme Court ruled that naturally occurring genes were unpatentable in the case Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics. Up until this decision, Myriad Genetics was the only company in the USA that could legally conduct diagnostic testing for BRCA1 and 2, genes that are linked to familial breast and ovarian cancer. The court case and rulings garnered discussion in public about patenting biological materials. This paper will describe the progression of the Myriad Genetics case, similar US rulings and biological intellectual property policies. In addition, it will discuss the impact of the case on biological patents - specifically those for human embryonic stem cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24750060     DOI: 10.2217/rme.13.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regen Med        ISSN: 1746-0751            Impact factor:   3.806


  2 in total

1.  Alienation from the Objectives of the Patent System: How to Remedy the Situation of Biotechnology Patent.

Authors:  Li Jiang
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria: Context, Mechanisms of Action, and Roadmap to Commercialization of Biostimulants for Sustainable Agriculture.

Authors:  Rachel Backer; J Stefan Rokem; Gayathri Ilangumaran; John Lamont; Dana Praslickova; Emily Ricci; Sowmyalakshmi Subramanian; Donald L Smith
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.753

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.