Literature DB >> 24750002

Tumor Directed, Scalp Sparing Intensity Modulated Whole Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases.

Johnny Kao1, Boramir Darakchiev2, Linda Conboy3, Sara Ogurek3, Neha Sharma3, Xuemin Ren3, Jeffrey Pettit3.   

Abstract

Despite significant technical advances in radiation delivery, conventional whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has not materially changed in the past 50 years. We hypothesized that IMRT can selectively spare uninvolved brain and scalp with the goal of reducing acute and late toxicity. MRI/CT simulation image registration was performed. We performed IMRT planning to simultaneously treat the brain tumor(s) on MRI + 5 mm margin to 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions while limiting the uninvolved brain + 2 mm margin to 30 Gy in 15 fractions and the mean scalp dose to #18 Gy. Three field IMRT plans were compared to conventional WBRT plans. Symptomatic patients were started on conventional WBRT for 2 to 3 fractions while IMRT planning was performed. Seventeen consecutive patients with brain metastases with RPA class I and II disease with no leptomeningeal spread were treated with IMRT WBRT. Compared to conventional WBRT, IMRT reduced the mean scalp dose (26.2 Gy vs. 16.4 Gy, p < 0.001) and the mean PTV30 dose (38.4 Gy vs. 32.0 Gy, p < 0.001) while achieving similar mean PTV37.5 doses (38.3 Gy vs. 38.0 Gy, p = 0.26). Using Olsen hair loss score criteria, 4 of 15 assessable patients preserved at least 50% of hair coverage at 1 to 3 months after treatment while 6 patients preserved between 25 and 50% hair coverage. At a median follow-up of 6.8 months (range: 5 to 15 months), the median overall survival was 5.4 months. Four patients relapsed within the brain, one within the PTV37.5 and three outside the PTV37.5. Tumor directed, scalp sparing IMRT is feasible, achieves rational dose distributions and preserves partial hair coverage in the majority of patients. Further studies are warranted to determine whether the increased utilization of resources needed for IMRT are appropriate in this setting.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain metastases; Intensity modulated radiation therapy; Prophylactic cranial irradiation; Scalp sparing IMRT; Whole brain radiotherapy.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24750002     DOI: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  6 in total

1.  Dosimetric study of whole-brain irradiation with high-energy photon beams for dose reduction to the scalp.

Authors:  Masafumi Sawada; Etsuo Kunieda; Takeshi Akiba; Shigeto Kabuki; Ryuta Nagao; Tsuyoshi Fukuzawa; Yoshitsugu Matsumoto; Naoyuki Shigematsu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Clinical Predictors of Survival for Patients with Stage IV Cancer Referred to Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  Johnny Kao; Kenneth D Gold; Gina Zarrili; Emily Copel; Andrew J Silverman; Shanta S Ramsaran; Shanata S Ramsaran; David Yens; Samuel Ryu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Dosimetric Predictors of Acute and Chronic Alopecia in Primary Brain Cancer Patients Treated With Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

Authors:  Silvia Scoccianti; Gabriele Simontacchi; Daniela Greto; Marco Perna; Francesca Terziani; Cinzia Talamonti; Maria Ausilia Teriaca; Giorgio Caramia; Monica Lo Russo; Emanuela Olmetto; Camilla Delli Paoli; Roberta Grassi; Vincenzo Carfora; Calogero Saieva; Pierluigi Bonomo; Beatrice Detti; Monica Mangoni; Isacco Desideri; Giulio Francolini; Vanessa Di Cataldo; Livia Marrazzo; Stefania Pallotta; Lorenzo Livi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Taiki Takaoka; Natsuo Tomita; Tomoki Mizuno; Shingo Hashimoto; Takahiro Tsuchiya; Masashi Tomida; Takeshi Yanagi
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

5.  Association of radiation dose intensity with overall survival in patients with distant metastases.

Authors:  Johnny Kao; Mark K Farrugia; Samantha Frontario; Amanda Zucker; Emily Copel; John Loscalzo; Ashish Sangal; Boramir Darakchiev; Anurag Singh; Symeon Missios
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Evaluation of Effective Parameters on Quality of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-computed Tomography Image Fusion in Head and Neck Tumors for Application in Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Atefeh Shirvani; Keyvan Jabbari; Alireza Amouheidari
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2017-12-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.