Literature DB >> 24749560

Urethral prolapse in dogs: a retrospective study.

Jennifer G Carr1, Karen M Tobias, Laura Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the signalment, clinical signs, treatment, and outcome of dogs with urethral prolapse and identify risk factors associated with prolapse or treatment. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series. ANIMALS: Dogs (n = 48) with urethral prolapse.
METHODS: Medical records (May 1995-June 2010) from 2 referral centers were reviewed. Retrieved data included signalment, clinical signs, laboratory findings, treatment, complications, results of long-term follow-up. Records from Veterinary Medical Data Base (VMDB) were evaluated to determine odds ratios.
RESULTS: Odds ratio for urethral prolapse in English bulldogs compared to all breeds was 366.99 (95% CI: 265.83, 506.65). Of 48 affected dogs, 46 had either resection and anastomosis (43 dogs) or urethropexy (3 dogs). The most common early postoperative complication was hemorrhage (39%); postoperative hemorrhage was less common when a simple continuous pattern was used for resection and anastomosis. Prolapse recurred in 57% of dogs available for long-term follow-up; recurrence was less common in dogs that were administered postoperative butorphanol or acepromazine. Gender was not associated with urethral prolapse or postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Urethral prolapse occurs most commonly in English bulldogs. Postoperative hemorrhage and prolapse recurrence may be reduced with use of a simple continuous pattern for urethral anastomosis and by administration of postoperative sedation, respectively. Castration status did not appear to affect prolapse development or outcome. © Copyright 2014 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24749560     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12190.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Surg        ISSN: 0161-3499            Impact factor:   1.495


  1 in total

1.  Urethral prolapse corrected by microsurgery in a cat: a case report.

Authors:  Luciana Gonçalves Teixeira; Michelli Westphal de Ataide; Vanessa Milech; Felipe Baldissarella Gavioli; Bernardo Nascimento Antunes; Stephanie Lanzarini Abati; Saulo Tadeu Lemos Pinto Filho; Mauricio Veloso Brun
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 1.267

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.