Literature DB >> 24748842

Intra- and inter-observer reliability in selection of the heart rate deflection point during incremental exercise: comparison to a computer-generated deflection point.

Daniel G Carey1, Robert L Raymond1, Bridget A Duoos1.   

Abstract

This study was designed to 1) determine the relative frequency of occurrence of a heart rate deflection point (HRDP), when compared to a linear relationship, during progressive exercise, 2) measure the reproducibility of a visual assessment of a heart rate deflection point (HRDP), both within and between observers 3) compare visual and computer-assessed deflection points. Subjects consisted of 73 competitive male cyclists with mean age of 31.4 ± 6.3 years, mean height 178.3 ± 4.8 cm. and weight 74.0 ± 4.4 kg. Tests were conducted on an electrically-braked cycle ergometer beginning at 25 watts and progressing 25 watts per minute to fatigue. Heart Rates were recorded the last 10 seconds of each stage and at fatigue. Scatter plots of heart rate versus watts were computer-generated and given to 3 observers on two different occasions. A computer program was developed to assess if data points were best represented by a single line or two lines. The HRDP represented the intersection of the two lines. Results of this study showed that 1) computer-assessed HRDP showed that 44 of 73 subjects (60.3%) had scatter plots best represented by a straight line with no HRDP 2)in those subjects having HRDP, all 3 observers showed significant differences(p = 0.048, p = 0.007, p = 0.001) in reproducibility of their HRDP selection. Differences in HRDP selection were significant for two of the three comparisons between observers (p = 0.002, p = 0.305, p = 0.0003) Computer-generated HRDP was significantly different than visual HRDP for 2 of 3 observers (p = 0.0016, p = 0.513, p = 0.0001). It is concluded that 1) HRDP occurs in a minority of subjects 2) significant differences exist, both within and between observers, in selection of HRDP and 3) differences in agreement between visual and computer-generated HRDP would indicate that, when HRDP exists, it should be computer-assessed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conconi; anaerobic threshold; lactate threshold.

Year:  2002        PMID: 24748842      PMCID: PMC3979002     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  42 in total

1.  Validity of the heart rate deflection point as a predictor of lactate threshold during running.

Authors:  J A Vachon; D R Bassett; S Clarke
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-07

2.  Heart rate response during incremental exercise in master runners.

Authors:  A Lucía; A Carvajal; M Pérez; A Boraita
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  2000-02

Review 3.  A review of the concept of the heart rate deflection point.

Authors:  M E Bodner; E C Rhodes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The Conconi test: a controversial concept for the determination of the anaerobic threshold in young rowers.

Authors:  J Bourgois; J Vrijens
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  Lack of reliability in Conconi's heart rate deflection point.

Authors:  A M Jones; J H Doust
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.118

6.  The relationship between anaerobic threshold and heart rate linearity during cycle ergometry.

Authors:  K T Francis; P R McClatchey; J R Sumsion; D E Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

7.  Noninvasive determination of the anaerobic threshold in swimming.

Authors:  M Cellini; P Vitiello; A Nagliati; P G Ziglio; S Martinelli; E Ballarin; F Conconi
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  Heart rate threshold related to lactate turn point and steady-state exercise on a cycle ergometer.

Authors:  P Hofmann; V Bunc; H Leitner; R Pokan; G Gaisl
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

9.  Heart rate break point may coincide with the anaerobic and not the aerobic threshold.

Authors:  J P Ribeiro; R A Fielding; V Hughes; A Black; M A Bochese; H G Knuttgen
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  Noninvasive determination of the anaerobic threshold in canoeing, cross-country skiing, cycling, roller, and ice-skating, rowing, and walking.

Authors:  P Droghetti; C Borsetto; I Casoni; M Cellini; M Ferrari; A R Paolini; P G Ziglio; F Conconi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1985
View more
  2 in total

1.  Cardiorespiratory responses to stationary running in water and on land.

Authors:  Luiz Fernando M Kruel; Débora D Beilke; Ana C Kanitz; Cristine L Alberton; Amanda H Antunes; Patrícia D Pantoja; Eduardo M da Silva; Stephanie S Pinto
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Respiratory Rate is a Valid and Reliable Marker for the Anaerobic Threshold: Implications for Measuring Change in Fitness.

Authors:  Daniel G Carey; Leslie A Schwarz; German J Pliego; Robert L Raymond
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.