Literature DB >> 24748689

Breaking Up is Hard to Do, Unless Everyone Else is Doing it Too: Social Network Effects on Divorce in a Longitudinal Sample.

Rose McDermott1, James Fowler2, Nicholas Christakis3.   

Abstract

Divorce represents the dissolution of a social tie, but it is also possible that attitudes about divorce flow across social ties. To explore how social networks influence divorce and vice versa, we exploit a longitudinal data set from the long-running Framingham Heart Study. The results suggest that divorce can spread between friends. Clusters of divorces extend to two degrees of separation in the network. Popular people are less likely to get divorced, divorcees have denser social networks, and they are much more likely to remarry other divorcees. Interestingly, the presence of children does not influence the likelihood of divorce, but each child reduces the susceptibility to being influenced by peers who get divorced. Overall, the results suggest that attending to the health of one's friends' marriages may serve to support and enhance the durability of one's own relationship, and that, from a policy perspective, divorce should be understood as a collective phenomenon that extends beyond those directly affected.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24748689      PMCID: PMC3990282          DOI: 10.1093/sf/sot096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Forces        ISSN: 0037-7732


  23 in total

1.  Stability across cohorts in divorce risk factors.

Authors:  Jay D Teachman
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2002-05

2.  The impact of family background and early marital factors on marital disruption.

Authors:  L L Bumpass; T C Martin; J A Sweet
Journal:  J Fam Issues       Date:  1991-03

3.  Regression analysis of longitudinal binary data with time-dependent environmental covariates: bias and efficiency.

Authors:  Jonathan S Schildcrout; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks.

Authors:  James H Fowler; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans.

Authors:  David G Rand; Samuel Arbesman; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies.

Authors:  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi; Andrew C Thomas
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2011-05

7.  Is obesity contagious? Social networks vs. environmental factors in the obesity epidemic.

Authors:  Ethan Cohen-Cole; Jason M Fletcher
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  An investigation of coronary heart disease in families. The Framingham offspring study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; M Feinleib; P M McNamara; R J Garrison; W P Castelli
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Wives and ex-wives: a new test for homogamy bias in the widowhood effect.

Authors:  Felix Elwert; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2008-11

10.  Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  James H Fowler; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-12-04
View more
  16 in total

1.  Everybody's Doin' It (Right?): Neighborhood Norms and Sexual Activity in Adolescence.

Authors:  Tara D Warner; Peggy C Giordano; Wendy D Manning; Monica A Longmore
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2011-11-01

2.  Does culture affect divorce? evidence from European immigrants in the United States.

Authors:  Delia Furtado; Miriam Marcén; Almudena Sevilla
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2013-06

3.  The gray divorce revolution: rising divorce among middle-aged and older adults, 1990-2010.

Authors:  Susan L Brown; I-Fen Lin
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 4.  Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior.

Authors:  Nicholas A Christakis; James H Fowler
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Parental divorce is not uniformly disruptive to children's educational attainment.

Authors:  Jennie E Brand; Ravaris Moore; Xi Song; Yu Xie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The Analysis of Duocentric Social Networks: A Primer.

Authors:  David P Kennedy; Grace L Jackson; Harold D Green; Thomas N Bradbury; Benjamin R Karney
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2015-01-14

7.  A Social Network Comparison of Low-Income Black and White Newlywed Couples.

Authors:  Grace L Jackson; David Kennedy; Thomas N Bradbury; Benjamin R Karney
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2014-10-01

8.  Couples' Diminished Social and Financial Capital Exacerbate the Association Between Maladaptive Attributions and Relationship Satisfaction.

Authors:  Teresa P Nguyen; Benjamin R Karney; David P Kennedy; Thomas N Bradbury
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2020-10-23

9.  Bridging Social Circles: Need for Cognition, Prejudicial Judgments, and Personal Social Network Characteristics.

Authors:  Petru L Curşeu; Jeroen P de Jong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-25

10.  Clustered marginalization of minorities during social transitions induced by co-evolution of behaviour and network structure.

Authors:  Carl-Friedrich Schleussner; Jonathan F Donges; Denis A Engemann; Anders Levermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.