Literature DB >> 24748526

Diagnostic performance of CT esophagography in patients with suspected esophageal rupture.

Tatiana Suarez-Poveda1, Carlos H Morales-Uribe, Alvaro Sanabria, Adriana Llano-Sánchez, Andrés Mauricio Valencia-Delgado, Luis Fernando Rivera-Velázquez, John Fernando Bedoya-Ospina.   

Abstract

Esophageal rupture is a surgical catastrophe. The gold standard for diagnosing is iodine, water-soluble contrast medium esophagography. CT esophagography has shown promising results. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of CT esophagography in patients with a suspicion of esophageal rupture. This prospective study assessed the performance of a diagnostic test and was approved by local IRB committee. Patients who presented with a clinical suspicion of esophageal rupture were included. CT esophagography findings were described by the emergency radiologist. Clinical outcomes (presence or absence of esophageal rupture) were reported by surgeons. The operative characteristics were calculated. A final predictive scale for rupture was built. A total of 64 patients were recruited (age 26.5 years, 90 % male, 82 % trauma). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) were 77.7 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 45-100), 94.3 % (87.2-100), 14 (9.81-19.9), and 0.24 (0.05-1.22), respectively. The final model for predicting rupture included five variables: age (odds ratio (OR) 1.03; 95 % CI, 0.95-1.11; p=0.04), leakage of contrast media into the mediastinum or pleural space (OR 10.0; 95 % CI, 0.64-156.9; p=0.10), extraluminal air or fluid collections (OR 43.1; 95 % CI, 1.52-1217.3; p=0.027), esophageal wall thickening (OR 10.1; 95 % CI, 0.50-202.8; p=0.12), and left pneumothorax or pleural effusion (OR 6.5; 95 % CI, 0.31-132.7; p=0.2). The overall agreement was 0.40 (95 % CI, 0.09-0.72) for the predictive model. The model sensitivity was 50.0 %, and the specificity was 98.4 %. CT esophagography shows a good diagnostic performance in patients with a suspected esophageal rupture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24748526     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-014-1222-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  11 in total

1.  Helical CT esophagography for the evaluation of suspected esophageal perforation or rupture.

Authors:  Farhan Fadoo; Diego E Ruiz; Samuel K Dawn; W Richard Webb; Michael B Gotway
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Stephen B Vogel; W Robert Rout; Tomas D Martin; Patricia L Abbitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: multidetector CT esophagography--comparison with endoscopy.

Authors:  Se Hyung Kim; Yoon Jun Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Kee Don Choi; Young Jin Chung; Joon Koo Han; Jae Young Lee; Min Woo Lee; Chang Jin Han; Joon Il Choi; Kyung-Sook Shin; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Esophageal injuries: spectrum of multidetector row CT findings.

Authors:  Elisabetta de Lutio di Castelguidone; Stefanella Merola; Antonio Pinto; Maria Raissaki; Nicola Gagliardi; Luigia Romano
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Spontaneous rupture of the esophagus; an experimental and clinical study.

Authors:  S A MACKLER
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1952-09

6.  Computed tomography in patients with esophageal perforation.

Authors:  C L Backer; J LoCicero; R S Hartz; J S Donaldson; T Shields
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Esophageal perforation.

Authors:  A E Flynn; E D Verrier; L W Way; A N Thomas; C A Pellegrini
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1989-10

Review 8.  Radiologic diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation.

Authors:  Stephen E Rubesin; Marc S Levine
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Esophageal disruption: evaluation with iohexol esophagography.

Authors:  S H Brick; D F Caroline; A S Lev-Toaff; A C Friedman; K Grumbach; P D Radecki
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Thoracic esophageal perforations.

Authors:  Paul D Kiernan; Michael J Sheridan; Eric Elster; John Rhee; Lucas Collazo; William D Byrne; Thomas Fulcher; Vivian Hettrick; Betty Vaughan; Paula Graling
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 0.954

View more
  2 in total

1.  Tension hydropneumothorax in a Boerhaave syndrome patient: A case report.

Authors:  Chun-Ting Wang; Hui Jiang; Joseph Walline; Yan Li; Jian Wang; Jun Xu; Hua-Dong Zhu
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2021

2.  Single-centre review of the management of intra-thoracic oesophageal perforation in a tertiary oesophageal unit: paradigm shift, short- and long-term outcomes over 15 years.

Authors:  Vasileios Charalampakis; Victor Roth Cardoso; Rajwinder Nijjar; Rishi Singhal; Alistair Sharples; Maha Khalid; Luke Dickerson; Tom Wiggins; Georgios V Gkoutos; Olga Tucker; Paul Super; Martin Richardson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.453

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.