Literature DB >> 24748458

Competition between phytoplankton and bacteria: exclusion and coexistence.

Frédéric Grognard1, Pierre Masci, Eric Benoît, Olivier Bernard.   

Abstract

Resource-based competition between microorganisms species in continuous culture has been studied extensively both experimentally and theoretically, mostly for bacteria through Monod and Contois "constant yield" models, or for phytoplankton through the Droop "variable yield" models. For homogeneous populations of N bacterial species (Monod) or N phytoplanktonic species (Droop), with one limiting substrate and under constant controls, the theoretical studies indicated that competitive exclusion occurs: only one species wins the competition and displaces all the others (Armstrong and McGehee in Am Nat 115:151, 1980; Hsu and Hsu in SIAM J Appl Math 68:1600-1617, 2008). The winning species expected from theory is the one with the lowest "substrate subsistence concentration" s([star]), such that its corresponding equilibrium growth rate is equal to the dilution rate D. This theoretical result was validated experimentally with phytoplankton (Tilman and Sterner in Oecologia 61(2):197-200, 1984) and bacteria (Hansen and Hubell in Science 207(4438):1491-1493, 1980), and observed in a lake with microalgae (Tilman in Ecology 58(22):338-348, 1977). On the contrary for aggregating bacterial species described by a Contois model, theory predicts coexistence between several species (Grognard et al. in Discrete Contin Dyn Syst Ser B 8(1):73-93, 2007). In this paper we present a generalization of these results by studying a competition between three different types of microorganisms: planktonic (or free) bacteria (represented by a generalized Monod model), aggregating bacteria (represented by a Contois model) and free phytoplankton (represented by a Droop model). We prove that the outcome of the competition is a coexistence between several aggregating bacterial species with a free species of bacteria or phytoplankton, all the other free species being washed out. This demonstration is based mainly on the study of the substrate concentration's evolution caused by competition; it converges towards the lowest subsistence concentration s([star]), leading to three different types of competition outcomes: (1) the best free bacteria or phytoplankton competitor excludes all other species; (2) only some aggregating bacterial species coexist in the chemostat; (3) A coexistence between the single best free species, with one or several aggregating species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24748458     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-014-0783-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  18 in total

Review 1.  Probiotic bacteria as biological control agents in aquaculture.

Authors:  L Verschuere; G Rombaut; P Sorgeloos; W Verstraete
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Identifying predator-prey processes from time-series.

Authors:  C Jost; R Arditi
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Competition between two species for two complementary or substitutable resources.

Authors:  J A León; D B Tumpson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Kinetics of bacterial growth: relationship between population density and specific growth rate of continuous cultures.

Authors:  D E CONTOIS
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1959-08

5.  Explanation and prediction in evolutionary theory.

Authors:  M SCRIVEN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1959-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The competitive exclusion principle.

Authors:  G HARDIN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1960-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Genetic diversity of 'satellite' bacteria present in cultures of marine diatoms.

Authors:  Hendrik Schäfer; Ben Abbas; Harry Witte; Gerard Muyzer
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 4.194

8.  Transient behavior of biological loop models with application to the Droop model.

Authors:  O Bernard; J L Gouzé
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.144

9.  Single-nutrient microbial competition: qualitative agreement between experimental and theoretically forecast outcomes.

Authors:  S R Hansen; S P Hubbell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-03-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Biodiesel from microalgae.

Authors:  Yusuf Chisti
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 14.227

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hydrogenotrophic methanogens of the mammalian gut: Functionally similar, thermodynamically different-A modelling approach.

Authors:  Rafael Muñoz-Tamayo; Milka Popova; Maxence Tillier; Diego P Morgavi; Jean-Pierre Morel; Gérard Fonty; Nicole Morel-Desrosiers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.