Literature DB >> 24748179

Randomized clinical trial comparing ultrasound-guided procedure with the Seldinger's technique for placement of implantable venous ports.

Jianzhong Miao1, Lijun Ji, Jianjun Lu, Jianqing Chen.   

Abstract

The aim of this randomized controlled study was to compare ultrasound-guided procedure with the Seldinger's technique for placement of implantable venous ports. A total of 214 patients were randomized to receive TIAP placement by either ultrasound-guided procedure or the Seldinger's technique. Complications and pain perception were compared between these two groups. No severe perioperative or periinterventional complication occurred. Significantly (P < 0.05) lower pain perception was observed in the ultrasound-guided group. Seldinger's technique group showed higher rate in incidence of early and late complications including catheter dislocation, catheter occlusion, venous thrombosis, fever of unknown origin, skin necrosis, and sepsis. In conclusion, both techniques, the TIAP implantation via ultrasound-guided jugular vein puncture and via Seldinger's technique subclavian vein puncture, are feasible and safe. Regarding intrainterventional pain perception and implantation-related complications, the jugular vein puncture under ultrasound guidance seems to be advantageous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24748179     DOI: 10.1007/s12013-014-9956-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys        ISSN: 1085-9195            Impact factor:   2.194


  6 in total

1.  Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Central Venous Port Systems via the Right Internal Jugular Vein: Are Chest X-ray and/or Fluoroscopy Needed to Confirm the Correct Placement of the Device.

Authors:  Chandan Kumar Jha; Raouef Ahmed Bichoo; Anjali Mishra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Central Venous Port Systems via the Right Internal Jugular Vein: Are Chest X-Ray and/or Fluoroscopy Needed to Confirm the Correct Placement of the Device?

Authors:  Michelangelo Miccini; Diletta Cassini; Matteo Gregori; Sergio Gazzanelli; Simone Cassibba; Daniele Biacchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Randomized controlled trials in central vascular access devices: A scoping review.

Authors:  Mari Takashima; Gillian Ray-Barruel; Amanda Ullman; Samantha Keogh; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Wide angled 'V' is the perfect disposition of a TIVAD catheter when right internal jugular vein is cannulated to gain central access.

Authors:  Chitresh Kumar; Chandan Kumar Jha; Raouef Ahmed Bichoo; Sanjay Kumar Yadav
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2019-07-15

5.  Internal jugular vein versus subclavian vein as the percutaneous insertion site for totally implantable venous access devices: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Shaoyong Wu; Jingxiu Huang; Zongming Jiang; Zhimei Huang; Handong Ouyang; Li Deng; Wenqian Lin; Jin Guo; Weian Zeng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Comparison of intraoperative ultrasonography guidance with an open surgical method for venous port catheter placement in chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ozan Onur Balkanay; Suleyman Demiryas
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2018-11-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.