Literature DB >> 24747981

Obtaining patient feedback in an outpatient lithotripsy service is facilitated by use of a touch-screen tablet (iPad™) survey.

B W Turney1, J M Reynard.   

Abstract

There is now a requirement for every doctor in the UK to obtain patient feedback for revalidation. This can be an onerous and time-consuming task. The objective of this study was to evaluate a novel electronic patient feedback method in an outpatient lithotripsy service setting. Between September 2013 and January 2014, 100 patients attending an outpatient lithotripsy service in Oxford were asked to complete a selection of pre-approved NHS questions about the service they had received. Questions were presented on a tablet device (iPad™) and answered using the touch screen. Departmental staff were unaware of the questions in the survey. Patients were asked to complete the survey by an independent research nurse. Questions were created online in a free-to-use web-based survey application and presented on the tablet device in a user-friendly format via an application. Data were uploaded via wifi™ to the online system. Data were viewed, automatically analysed and displayed graphically. The age range of the patients surveyed was 20-80 years of age. All 100 patients completed the survey without difficulty. All patients answered every question. Data could be automatically viewed, analysed and presented graphically. This method of collecting patient feedback proved to be rapid and efficient. The feedback highlighted a high patient satisfaction with the lithotripsy service. A touch screen tablet device is an efficient and effective method of collecting truly objective patient feedback. This method of patient feedback could be employed in other clinical environments to collect data for revalidation purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24747981     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-014-0662-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  7 in total

1.  Trends in urological stone disease.

Authors:  Benjamin W Turney; John M Reynard; Jeremy G Noble; Stephen R Keoghane
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  eCHAT for lifestyle and mental health screening in primary care.

Authors:  Felicity Goodyear-Smith; Jim Warren; Minja Bojic; Angela Chong
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of EHR-integrated mobile patient questionnaires regarding usability and cost-efficiency.

Authors:  Fleur Fritz; Sebastian Balhorn; Markus Riek; Bernhard Breil; Martin Dugas
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  Audiovisual distraction reduces pain perception during shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Emma Marsdin; Jeremy G Noble; John M Reynard; Benjamin W Turney
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  An investigation of the efficacy of electronic consenting interfaces of research permissions management system in a hospital setting.

Authors:  Kapil Chalil Madathil; Reshmi Koikkara; Jihad Obeid; Joel S Greenstein; Iain C Sanderson; Katrina Fryar; Jay Moskowitz; Anand K Gramopadhye
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Does Socioeconomic Status Affect Patients' Ease of Use of a Touch-Screen (iPad) Patient Survey?

Authors:  Saman Zarghom; David Di Fonzo; Fok-Han Leung
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2013-01-11

7.  Validation of a new mass screening tool for cognitive impairment: Cognitive Assessment for Dementia, iPad version.

Authors:  Keiichi Onoda; Tsuyoshi Hamano; Yoko Nabika; Atsuo Aoyama; Hiroyuki Takayoshi; Tomonori Nakagawa; Masaki Ishihara; Shingo Mitaki; Takuya Yamaguchi; Hiroaki Oguro; Kuninori Shiwaku; Shuhei Yamaguchi
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.458

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Reliability of diagnosing acute ischemic cerebrovascular on magnetic resonance imaging disorders using iPads.

Authors:  Hidekazu Hattori; Yoshifumi Kuwayama; Yoshitaka Inui; Kazuhiro Murayama; Motoharu Hayakawa; Shinji Ito; Hiroshi Toyama
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Feasibility of the collection of patient-reported outcomes in an ambulatory neurology clinic.

Authors:  Lidia M V R Moura; Eli Schwamm; Valdery Moura Junior; Michael P Seitz; John Hsu; Andrew J Cole; Lee H Schwamm
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Patient-reported financial barriers to adherence to treatment in neurology.

Authors:  Lidia Mvr Moura; Eli L Schwamm; Valdery Moura Junior; Michael P Seitz; Daniel B Hoch; John Hsu; Lee H Schwamm
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2016-11-17

4.  Patient and public involvement in medical performance processes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mirza Lalani; Rebecca Baines; Marie Bryce; Martin Marshall; Sol Mead; Stephen Barasi; Julian Archer; Samantha Regan de Bere
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  A comparative study of postoperative pain for open thyroidectomy versus bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy using a self-reporting application for iPad.

Authors:  Young Jun Chai; Junho Song; Jiyoung Kang; Jung-Woo Woo; Ra-Yeong Song; Hyungju Kwon; Su-Jin Kim; June Young Choi; Kyu Eun Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 1.859

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.