Literature DB >> 24747589

Clinical performance evaluation of the BD Veritor System Flu A+B assay.

Myung-Hyun Nam1, Jin Woo Jang1, Jong-Han Lee1, Chi Hyun Cho1, Chae Seung Lim2, Woo Joo Kim3.   

Abstract

Early identification of influenza is important for optimal patient management and infection control. Rapid influenza antigen tests have been used routinely in clinical settings to confirm clinical suspicion, despite their low sensitivity. To improve sensitivity, various influenza point-of-care test reader systems have been developed. This study evaluated the clinical performance of a digital readout rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT), the BD Veritor™ System Flu A+B assay (BD). Nasopharyngeal swabs taken from 250 patients (influenza A positive, n=75; influenza B positive, n=75; and influenza negative, n=100) were analyzed using the BinaxNOW® Influenza A/B antigen kit (BN), SD Influenza Ag A/B kit (SD), BD, real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and an influenza virus culture. Compared to RT-PCR, the sensitivities of BN, SD, and BD were 56.0, 53.3, and 72.0%, respectively, for influenza A and 57.3, 65.3, and 69.3%, respectively, for influenza B. No false-positive results were noted with the three rapid antigen tests. For influenza A, the average RT-PCR threshold cycle (Ct) for specimens that tested positive using BD was higher than that for specimens that tested positive using BN and SD. BD is a sensitive and easy method for the early detection of influenza A and B.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BD Veritor™ System; Evaluation; Influenza; Point-of-care; Rapid antigen test; Sensitivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24747589     DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol Methods        ISSN: 0166-0934            Impact factor:   2.014


  6 in total

1.  New rapid diagnostic tests: a real improvement for clinical use?

Authors:  Rafael Fernández-Santos; Juan Rodríguez-García; Ignacio Rodríguez-García
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Can newly developed, rapid immunochromatographic antigen detection tests be reliably used for the laboratory diagnosis of influenza virus infections?

Authors:  James J Dunn; Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Viruses Causing Acute Respiratory Tract Infections.

Authors:  Carmen L Charlton; Esther Babady; Christine C Ginocchio; Todd F Hatchette; Robert C Jerris; Yan Li; Mike Loeffelholz; Yvette S McCarter; Melissa B Miller; Susan Novak-Weekley; Audrey N Schuetz; Yi-Wei Tang; Ray Widen; Steven J Drews
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Pathology Consultation on Influenza Diagnostics.

Authors:  Allison R McMullen; Neil W Anderson; Carey-Ann D Burnham
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Comparison of three rapid influenza diagnostic tests with digital readout systems and one conventional rapid influenza diagnostic test.

Authors:  Sook Won Ryu; In Bum Suh; Se-Min Ryu; Kyu Sung Shin; Hyon-Suk Kim; Juwon Kim; Young Uh; Kap Jun Yoon; Jong-Han Lee
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  Clinical Evaluation of BD Veritor SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A+B Assay for Point-Of-Care System.

Authors:  Katherine Christensen; Huimiao Ren; Shirley Chen; Charles K Cooper; Stephen Young
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-04-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.