Literature DB >> 24747461

External validation of the Blunt Abdominal Trauma in Children (BATiC) score: ruling out significant abdominal injury in children.

Willem-Jan J de Jong1, Leon Stoepker, David R Nellensteijn, Henk Groen, Mostafa El Moumni, Jan B Hulscher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to validate the use of the Blunt Abdominal Trauma in Children (BATiC) score. The BATiC score uses only readily available laboratory parameters, ultrasound results, and results from physical examination and does therefore not carry any risk of additional radiation exposure.
METHODS: Data of pediatric trauma patients admitted to the shock room between 2006 and 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Blunt abdominal trauma was defined radiologically or surgically. The BATiC score was computed using 10 parameters as follows: abnormal abdominal ultrasound finding, abdominal pain, peritoneal irritation, hemodynamic instability, aspartate aminotransferase greater than 60 U/L, alanine aminotransferase greater than 25 U/L, white blood cell count greater than 10 × 10/L, lactate dehydrogenase greater than 330 U/L, amylase greater than 100 U/L, and creatinine greater than 110 μmol/L. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were computed. Missing values were replaced using multiple imputation, and BATiC scores were calculated based on imputed values.
RESULTS: Included were 216 patients, with 144 males, 72 females, and a median age of 12 years. Eighteen patients (8%) sustained abdominal injury. Median BATiC scores of patients with and without intra-abdominal injury were 9.2 (range, 6.6-15.4) and 2.2 (range, 0.0-10.6) respectively (p < 0.001). When the BATiC score is used with a cutoff point of 6, the test showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 87%. Negative and positive predictive values were 100% and 41% respectively. The area under the curve was 0.98.
CONCLUSION: The BATiC score can be a useful adjunct in the assessment of the presence of abdominal trauma in children and can help determine which patients might benefit from a computed tomographic scan and/or further treatment and which might not. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24747461     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  5 in total

1.  Costal Margin Tenderness and the Risk for Intraabdominal Injuries in Children With Blunt Abdominal Trauma.

Authors:  Katherine T Flynn-O'Brien; Nathan Kuppermann; James F Holmes
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Duodenal perforation as result of blunt abdominal trauma in childhood.

Authors:  Klaas Albert Hartholt; Jan Willem T Dekker
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-12-23

3.  Prospective evaluation of an evidence-based decision tool to assess pediatric blunt abdominal trauma (BAT).

Authors:  Elizabeth Boudiab; Samer Kawak; Alan Tom; Diane Studzinski; Nathan Novotny; Pavan Brahmamdam; Begum Akay
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Evaluation of intra-abdominal solid organ injuries in children.

Authors:  Ayse Basaran; Seda Ozkan
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2019-01-15

5.  Efficacy of new scoring system for diagnosis of abdominal injury after blunt abdominal trauma in patients referred to emergency department.

Authors:  Majid Shojaee; Anita Sabzghabaei; Ali Heidari
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2020-03-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.