BACKGROUND: Endo-epicardial substrate ablation reduces ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrences; however, not all patients in whom the epicardium is explored have a VT substrate. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (ceMRI) is used to characterize VT substrate after myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if epicardial VT substrate can be identified noninvasively by ceMRI-based endo-epicardial signal intensity (SI) mapping. METHODS: Myocardial infarction was induced in 31 pigs. Four or 16 weeks later, ceMRI was obtained, and the averaged subendocardial and subepicardial SIs were projected onto 3-dimensional endocardial and epicardial shells in which dense scar, heterogeneous tissue (HT), and normal tissue were differentiated. An HT channel was defined as a corridor of HT surrounded by dense scar and connected to normal tissue. A "patchy" scar pattern was defined as the presence of at least 3 dense scar islets surrounded by HT forming ≥2 HT channels. Electrophysiologic study was performed after ceMRI. RESULTS: Thirty-three different sustained monomorphic VTs (291 ± 49 ms) were induced in 25 pigs. Mid-diastolic electrograms were recorded in the endocardium (endocardial VT) in 17 and in the epicardium (epicardial VT) in 13. Epicardial SI mapping showed that scar area was similar in animals with and without epicardial VT (24 ± 6 cm2 vs. 25 ± 12 cm2), but HT covered a higher surface of the epicardial scar in animals with VT (76 ± 6% vs. 61 ± 10%, P = .03). A patchy scar pattern was observed in all animals with epicardial VT but only in 3 animals without VT (P < .001). CONCLUSION: CeMRI-based SI mapping allows identification of the epicardial VT substrate.
BACKGROUND: Endo-epicardial substrate ablation reduces ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrences; however, not all patients in whom the epicardium is explored have a VT substrate. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (ceMRI) is used to characterize VT substrate after myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if epicardial VT substrate can be identified noninvasively by ceMRI-based endo-epicardial signal intensity (SI) mapping. METHODS:Myocardial infarction was induced in 31 pigs. Four or 16 weeks later, ceMRI was obtained, and the averaged subendocardial and subepicardial SIs were projected onto 3-dimensional endocardial and epicardial shells in which dense scar, heterogeneous tissue (HT), and normal tissue were differentiated. An HT channel was defined as a corridor of HT surrounded by dense scar and connected to normal tissue. A "patchy" scar pattern was defined as the presence of at least 3 dense scar islets surrounded by HT forming ≥2 HT channels. Electrophysiologic study was performed after ceMRI. RESULTS: Thirty-three different sustained monomorphic VTs (291 ± 49 ms) were induced in 25 pigs. Mid-diastolic electrograms were recorded in the endocardium (endocardial VT) in 17 and in the epicardium (epicardial VT) in 13. Epicardial SI mapping showed that scar area was similar in animals with and without epicardial VT (24 ± 6 cm2 vs. 25 ± 12 cm2), but HT covered a higher surface of the epicardial scar in animals with VT (76 ± 6% vs. 61 ± 10%, P = .03). A patchy scar pattern was observed in all animals with epicardial VT but only in 3 animals without VT (P < .001). CONCLUSION: CeMRI-based SI mapping allows identification of the epicardial VT substrate.
Authors: Mindy Vroomen; Bart Maesen; Mark La Meir; Justin G L Luermans; Kevin Vernooy; Jos G Maessen; Harry J Crijns; Laurent Pison Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2019-02-28
Authors: Rahul K Mukherjee; Sébastien Roujol; Henry Chubb; James Harrison; Steven Williams; John Whitaker; Louisa O'Neill; John Silberbauer; Radhouene Neji; Rainer Schneider; Thomas Pohl; Tom Lloyd; Mark O'Neill; Reza Razavi Journal: Europace Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Uyên Châu Nguyên; Francesco Maffessanti; Masih Mafi-Rad; Giulio Conte; Stef Zeemering; François Regoli; Maria Luce Caputo; Antonius M W van Stipdonk; Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers; Daniel Suerder; Tiziano Moccetti; Rolf Krause; Frits W Prinzen; Kevin Vernooy; Angelo Auricchio Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael Spartalis; Eleftherios Spartalis; Eleni Tzatzaki; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Demetrios Moris; Christos Kontogiannis; Efthimios Livanis; Dimitrios C Iliopoulos; Vassilis Voudris; George N Theodorakis Journal: World J Cardiol Date: 2018-07-26
Authors: Susana Merino-Caviedes; Lilian K Gutierrez; José Manuel Alfonso-Almazán; Santiago Sanz-Estébanez; Lucilio Cordero-Grande; Jorge G Quintanilla; Javier Sánchez-González; Manuel Marina-Breysse; Carlos Galán-Arriola; Daniel Enríquez-Vázquez; Carlos Torres; Gonzalo Pizarro; Borja Ibáñez; Rafael Peinado; Jose Luis Merino; Julián Pérez-Villacastín; José Jalife; Mariña López-Yunta; Mariano Vázquez; Jazmín Aguado-Sierra; Juan José González-Ferrer; Nicasio Pérez-Castellano; Marcos Martín-Fernández; Carlos Alberola-López; David Filgueiras-Rama Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 4.379