Literature DB >> 24747256

Water quality laboratories in Colombia: a GIS-based study of urban and rural accessibility.

Jim Wright1, Jing Liu2, Robert Bain3, Andrea Perez4, Jonny Crocker5, Jamie Bartram6, Stephen Gundry7.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to quantify sample transportation times associated with mandated microbiological monitoring of drinking-water in Colombia. World Health Organization Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality recommend that samples spend no more than 6h between collection and analysis in a laboratory. Census data were used to estimate the minimum number of operational and surveillance samples required from piped water supplies under national regulations. Drive-times were then computed from each supply system to the nearest accredited laboratory and translated into sample holding times based on likely daily monitoring patterns. Of 62,502 surveillance samples required annually, 5694 (9.1%) were found to be more than 6 h from the nearest of 278 accredited laboratories. 612 samples (1.0%) were more than 24 hours' drive from the nearest accredited laboratory, the maximum sample holding time recommended by the World Health Organization. An estimated 30% of required rural samples would have to be stored for more than 6 h before reaching a laboratory. The analysis demonstrates the difficulty of undertaking microbiological monitoring in rural areas and small towns from a fixed laboratory network. Our GIS-based approach could be adapted to optimise monitoring strategies and support planning of testing and transportation infra-structure development. It could also be used to estimate sample transport and holding times in other countries.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drinking water; Faecal indicator bacteria; GIS; Monitoring; Spatial analysis; Water supply

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24747256     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  How Much Will It Cost To Monitor Microbial Drinking Water Quality in Sub-Saharan Africa?

Authors:  Caroline Delaire; Rachel Peletz; Emily Kumpel; Joyce Kisiangani; Robert Bain; Ranjiv Khush
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Can Sanitary Surveys Replace Water Quality Testing? Evidence from Kisii, Kenya.

Authors:  Aaron Gichaba Misati; George Ogendi; Rachel Peletz; Ranjiv Khush; Emily Kumpel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Efficacy of microbial sampling recommendations and practices in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  David D J Taylor; Ranjiv Khush; Rachel Peletz; Emily Kumpel
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Effect of Inter-Observer Variation on the Association between Contamination Hazards and the Microbiological Quality of Water Sources: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Joseph Okotto-Okotto; Diogo Trajano Gomes da Silva; Emmah Kwoba; Samuel M Thumbi; Peggy Wanza; Weiyu Yu; Jim A Wright
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  An Assessment of Inter-Observer Agreement in Water Source Classification and Sanitary Risk Observations.

Authors:  Joseph Okotto-Okotto; Peggy Wanza; Emmah Kwoba; Weiyu Yu; Mawuli Dzodzomenyo; S M Thumbi; Diogo Gomes da Silva; Jim A Wright
Journal:  Expo Health       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 11.422

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.