Literature DB >> 24747140

Greywater use in Israel and worldwide: standards and prospects.

Gideon Oron1, Mike Adel2, Vered Agmon3, Eran Friedler4, Rami Halperin5, Ehud Leshem6, Daniel Weinberg7.   

Abstract

Water shortage around the world enhanced the search for alternative sources. Greywater (GW) can serve as a solution for water demands especially in arid and semi-arid zones. However, issues considered which include acceptability of GW segregation as a separate water treated stream, allowing its use onsite. Consequently, it is the one of next forthcoming water resources that will be used, primarily in the growing mega-cities. It will be even more rentable when combined with the roof runoff water harvesting and condensing water from air-conditioning systems. Reuse of GW is as well beneficial in the mega-cities subject to the high expenses associated with wastewater and fresh water conveyance in the opposite direction. The main problem associated with GW reuse is the quality of the water and the targeted reuse options. At least two main options can be identified: the public sector that is ready to reuse the GW and the private sector which raises extra issues related to the reuse risks. These risk stems from the on yard use of GW, relatively close to the household location. The main focus of the Israeli guidelines for GW use is on the private and single house. The problem is less rigorous in public facilities, where the amounts are relatively large and the raw GW is relatively diluted. The two main principles adopted for reuse are: (i) greywater can be minimally treated since it differs from the black wastes, and; (ii) no contact exists with the resident around. The aggravated standards are an indication of the sensitivity issues related to the problem.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Criteria; Greywater; Private sector; Public sector; Reuse

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24747140     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

1.  Field study of the composition of greywater and comparison of microbiological indicators of water quality in on-site systems.

Authors:  Margaret Leonard; Brent Gilpin; Beth Robson; Katrina Wall
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Harvesting of microalgae biomass from the phycoremediation process of greywater.

Authors:  Hauwa Atiku; R M S R Mohamed; A A Al-Gheethi; A A Wurochekke; Amir Hashim M Kassim
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Chemical characterisation, antibacterial activity, and (nano)silver transformation of commercial personal care products exposed to household greywater.

Authors:  Maryam Khaksar; Sotirios Vasileiadis; Ryo Sekine; Gianluca Brunetti; Kirk G Scheckel; Krasimir Vasilev; Enzo Lombi; Erica Donner
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2019-09-13

4.  Quantitative microbial risk assessment of Greywater on-site reuse.

Authors:  Kuang-Wei Shi; Cheng-Wen Wang; Sunny C Jiang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Horizontal Flow Constructed Wetland for Greywater Treatment and Reuse: An Experimental Case.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Collivignarelli; Marco Carnevale Miino; Franco Hernan Gomez; Vincenzo Torretta; Elena Cristina Rada; Sabrina Sorlini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Microbiological Health Risk Assessment of Water Conservation Strategies: A Case Study in Amsterdam.

Authors:  Agung Kusumawardhana; Ljiljana Zlatanovic; Arne Bosch; Jan Peter van der Hoek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.