Literature DB >> 24746994

Clinical outcomes and changes in lung function after segmentectomy versus lobectomy for lung cancer cases.

Bo Deng1, Stephen D Cassivi2, Mariza de Andrade3, Francis C Nichols2, Victor F Trastek2, Yi Wang4, Jason A Wampfler3, Shawn M Stoddard5, Dennis A Wigle2, Robert K Shen2, Mark S Allen2, Claude Deschamps2, Ping Yang6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical outcomes and changes in pulmonary function test (PFT) results after segmentectomy or lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.
METHODS: The retrospective study included 212 patients who had undergone segmentectomy (group S) and 2336 patients who had undergone lobectomy (group L) from 1997 to 2012. The follow-up and medical record data were collected. We used all the longitudinal PFT data within 24 months postoperatively and performed linear mixed modeling. We analyzed the 5-year overall and disease-free survival in stage IA patients. We used propensity score case matching to minimize the bias due to imbalanced group comparisons.
RESULTS: During the perioperative period, 1 death (0.4%) in group S and 7 (0.3%) in group L occurred. The hospital stay for the 2 groups was similar (median, 5.0 vs 5.0 days; range, 2-99 vs 2-58). The mean overall and disease-free survival period of those with T1a after segmentectomy or lobectomy seemed to be similar (4.2 vs 4.5 years, P=.06; and 4.1 vs 4.4 years, P=.07, respectively). Compared with segmentectomy, lobectomy yielded marginally significantly better overall (4.4 vs 3.9 years, P=.05) and disease-free (4.1 vs 3.6 years; P=.05) survival in those with T1b. We did not find a significantly different effect on the PFTs after segmentectomy or lobectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical types were safe. We would advocate lobectomy for patients with stage IA disease, especially those with T1b. A retrospective study with a large sample size and more detailed information should be conducted for PFT evaluation, with additional stratification by lobe and laterality.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24746994      PMCID: PMC4169754          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  29 in total

1.  Comparison of thoracoscopic segmentectomy and thoracoscopic lobectomy for small-sized stage IA lung cancer.

Authors:  Chenxi Zhong; Wentao Fang; Teng Mao; Feng Yao; Wenhu Chen; Dingzhong Hu
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  R J Ginsberg; L V Rubinstein
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  The current status of postoperative complications and risk factors after a pulmonary resection for primary lung cancer. A multivariate analysis.

Authors:  T Yano; H Yokoyama; Y Fukuyama; E Takai; K Mizutani; Y Ichinose
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Clinical features of 5,628 primary lung cancer patients: experience at Mayo Clinic from 1997 to 2003.

Authors:  Ping Yang; Mark S Allen; Marie C Aubry; Jason A Wampfler; Randolph S Marks; Eric S Edell; Stephen Thibodeau; Alex A Adjei; James Jett; Claude Deschamps
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Reasonable extent of lymph node dissection in intentional segmentectomy for small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer: from the clinicopathological findings of patients who underwent lobectomy with systematic lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Yuki Matsumura; Tomoyuki Hishida; Junji Yoshida; Keiju Aokage; Genichiro Ishii; Kanji Nagai
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Is completion lobectomy merited for unanticipated nodal metastases after radical segmentectomy for cT1 N0 M0/pN1-2 non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Hiroaki Nomori; Takeshi Mori; Yotaro Izumi; Mitsutomo Kohno; Kentaro Yoshimoto; Makoto Suzuki
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Prognosis of Stage II non-small cell lung cancer according to tumor and nodal status at diagnosis.

Authors:  Juan P Wisnivesky; Claudia Henschke; Thomas McGinn; Michael C Iannuzzi
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 5.705

8.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy has increasing benefit in patients with poor pulmonary function: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database analysis.

Authors:  DuyKhanh P Ceppa; Andrzej S Kosinski; Mark F Berry; Betty C Tong; David H Harpole; John D Mitchell; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark W Onaitis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Design and data analysis 1 study design.

Authors:  Karthik Suresh; Geetha Suresh; Sanjeev V Thomas
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.383

View more
  25 in total

1.  How to decrease technical obstacles to difficult video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy?

Authors:  Wolfram Karenovics; Michel Gonzalez
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The lobar vs. sublobar "limited" resection respiratory function preservation debate: learning to speak the same language.

Authors:  Vasileios Kouritas; Richard Milton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-04

3.  Recovery of lung function after segmentectomy versus lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Tawee Tanvetyanon; Robert J Keenan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Does segmentectomy really preserve the pulmonary function better than lobectomy for patients with early-stage lung cancer?

Authors:  Hidemi Suzuki; Junichi Morimoto; Teruaki Mizobuchi; Taiki Fujiwara; Kaoru Nagato; Takahiro Nakajima; Takekazu Iwata; Shigetoshi Yoshida; Ichiro Yoshino
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Comparing the postoperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy using a multi-port technique versus a single-port technique for primary lung cancer.

Authors:  Chih-Shiun Shih; Chia-Chuan Liu; Zhen-Ying Liu; Nicolas Pennarun; Chih-Tao Cheng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  VATS segmentectomy: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Seshiru Nakazawa; Kimihiro Shimizu; Akira Mogi; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

Review 7.  Surgical treatment for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Vignesh Raman; Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; John Z Deng; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Feasibility analysis for the development of a video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy 23-hour recovery pathway.

Authors:  Teodora-Cristiana Dumitra; Juan-Carlos Molina; Jack Mouhanna; Ioana Nicolau; Stephane Renaud; Ludovic Aubin; Aya Siblini; David Mulder; Lorenzo Ferri; Jonathan Spicer
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 9.  Thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomies for lung cancer: technical aspects.

Authors:  Dominique Gossot; Jon Lutz; Madalina Grigoroiu; Emmanuel Brian; Agathe Seguin-Givelet
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-11-30

Review 10.  VATS segmentectomy: an underused option?

Authors:  Paolo Mendogni; Davide Tosi; Lorenzo Rosso; Alessandro Palleschi; Margherita Cattaneo; Alessandra Mazzucco; Mario Nosotti
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.