Literature DB >> 24746928

Are there any gender differences in the hippocampus volume after head-size correction? A volumetric and voxel-based morphometric study.

Gabor Perlaki1, Gergely Orsi2, Eniko Plozer3, Anna Altbacker3, Gergely Darnai3, Szilvia Anett Nagy4, Reka Horvath3, Arnold Toth5, Tamas Doczi6, Norbert Kovacs7, Peter Bogner4, Attila Schwarcz6, Jozsef Janszky7.   

Abstract

Previous findings on normal sexual dimorphism in hippocampal volume have not always been consistent. This study investigated gender differences in hippocampal volume using different head-size correction strategies. T1-weighted MR images were collected in 99 healthy, Caucasian, university students (66 female subjects; mean age: 23.1 ± 2.3, range: 19-31 years). Sexual dimorphism in hippocampus was investigated by automated MRI volumetry and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) using both general linear model (GLM) and proportion head-size correction strategies. Absolute hippocampal volumes were larger in men than women. After adjusting for head-size, the proportion method indicated larger hippocampi in women than men, while no gender differences were found using the GLM approach. Investigating absolute hippocampal volumes in 15 head-size matched pairs of males and females indicated no gender differences. We suggest that there is no sexual dimorphism in hippocampal size and the apparent gender differences found by the proportion method may have more to do with head-size than with sex. The GLM and proportion head-size correction strategies are not interchangeable and may yield different results. The importance of the present findings is mostly related to scientific reproducibility across MRI volumetry or VBM studies.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gender difference; Head-size correction; Hippocampus; MRI; VBM; Volumetry

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24746928     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  22 in total

1.  Functional organization of human subgenual cortical areas: Relationship between architectonical segregation and connectional heterogeneity.

Authors:  Nicola Palomero-Gallagher; Simon B Eickhoff; Felix Hoffstaedter; Axel Schleicher; Hartmut Mohlberg; Brent A Vogt; Katrin Amunts; Karl Zilles
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Simultaneous total intracranial volume and posterior fossa volume estimation using multi-atlas label fusion.

Authors:  Yuankai Huo; Andrew J Asman; Andrew J Plassard; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Quantitative assessment of field strength, total intracranial volume, sex, and age effects on the goodness of harmonization for volumetric analysis on the ADNI database.

Authors:  Da Ma; Karteek Popuri; Mahadev Bhalla; Oshin Sangha; Donghuan Lu; Jiguo Cao; Claudia Jacova; Lei Wang; Mirza Faisal Beg
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The Association Between Neighborhood Poverty and Hippocampal Volume Among Individuals at Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis: The Moderating Role of Social Engagement.

Authors:  Benson S Ku; Katrina Aberizk; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Ricardo E Carrión; Michael T Compton; Barbara A Cornblatt; Benjamin G Druss; Daniel H Mathalon; Diana O Perkins; Ming T Tsuang; Scott W Woods; Elaine F Walker
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 7.348

5.  Sex Differences in Alzheimer's Disease Revealed by Free-Water Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Voxel-Based Morphometry.

Authors:  Maurizio Bergamino; Elizabeth G Keeling; Leslie C Baxter; Nicholas J Sisco; Ryan R Walsh; Ashley M Stokes
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.160

6.  Relationship between inflammatory biomarker galectin-3 and hippocampal volume in a community study.

Authors:  Megan K Lowther; Jarrod P Tunnell; Jayme M Palka; Darlene R King; Damilola C Salako; Dimitri G Macris; Jay B Italiya; Justin L Grodin; Carol S North; E Sherwood Brown
Journal:  J Neuroimmunol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 7.  Neurobiological mechanisms underlying sex-related differences in stress-related disorders: Effects of neuroactive steroids on the hippocampus.

Authors:  Katharina M Hillerer; David A Slattery; Belinda Pletzer
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 8.606

8.  Hippocampal subregion volume in high-risk offspring is associated with increases in depressive symptoms across the transition to adolescence.

Authors:  Samantha Hubachek; Morgan Botdorf; Tracy Riggins; Hoi-Chung Leong; Daniel N Klein; Lea R Dougherty
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.839

9.  Accurate automatic estimation of total intracranial volume: a nuisance variable with less nuisance.

Authors:  Ian B Malone; Kelvin K Leung; Shona Clegg; Josephine Barnes; Jennifer L Whitwell; John Ashburner; Nick C Fox; Gerard R Ridgway
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Marked effects of intracranial volume correction methods on sex differences in neuroanatomical structures: a HUNT MRI study.

Authors:  Carl W S Pintzka; Tor I Hansen; Hallvard R Evensmoen; Asta K Håberg
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.