Literature DB >> 24746924

Error-free versus mutagenic processing of genomic uracil--relevance to cancer.

Hans E Krokan1, Pål Sætrom2, Per Arne Aas3, Henrik Sahlin Pettersen4, Bodil Kavli3, Geir Slupphaug3.   

Abstract

Genomic uracil is normally processed essentially error-free by base excision repair (BER), with mismatch repair (MMR) as an apparent backup for U:G mismatches. Nuclear uracil-DNA glycosylase UNG2 is the major enzyme initiating BER of uracil of U:A pairs as well as U:G mismatches. Deficiency in UNG2 results in several-fold increases in genomic uracil in mammalian cells. Thus, the alternative uracil-removing glycosylases, SMUG1, TDG and MBD4 cannot efficiently complement UNG2-deficiency. A major function of SMUG1 is probably to remove 5-hydroxymethyluracil from DNA with general back-up for UNG2 as a minor function. TDG and MBD4 remove deamination products U or T mismatched to G in CpG/mCpG contexts, but may have equally or more important functions in development, epigenetics and gene regulation. Genomic uracil was previously thought to arise only from spontaneous cytosine deamination and incorporation of dUMP, generating U:G mismatches and U:A pairs, respectively. However, the identification of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) and other APOBEC family members as DNA-cytosine deaminases has spurred renewed interest in the processing of genomic uracil. Importantly, AID triggers the adaptive immune response involving error-prone processing of U:G mismatches, but also contributes to B-cell lymphomagenesis. Furthermore, mutational signatures in a substantial fraction of other human cancers are consistent with APOBEC-induced mutagenesis, with U:G mismatches as prime suspects. Mutations can be caused by replicative polymerases copying uracil in U:G mismatches, or by translesion polymerases that insert incorrect bases opposite abasic sites after uracil-removal. In addition, kataegis, localized hypermutations in one strand in the vicinity of genomic rearrangements, requires APOBEC protein, UNG2 and translesion polymerase REV1. What mechanisms govern error-free versus error prone processing of uracil in DNA remains unclear. In conclusion, genomic uracil is an essential intermediate in adaptive immunity and innate antiviral responses, but may also be a fundamental cause of a wide range of malignancies.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AID/APOBEC; Adaptive immunity; Base excision repair; Cancer; Genomic uracil; Mutational signatures

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24746924     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  30 in total

1.  The deaminase APOBEC3B triggers the death of cells lacking uracil DNA glycosylase.

Authors:  Artur A Serebrenik; Gabriel J Starrett; Sterre Leenen; Matthew C Jarvis; Nadine M Shaban; Daniel J Salamango; Hilde Nilsen; William L Brown; Reuben S Harris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  APOBEC3A damages the cellular genome during DNA replication.

Authors:  Abby M Green; Sébastien Landry; Konstantin Budagyan; Daphne C Avgousti; Sophia Shalhout; Ashok S Bhagwat; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Senescent cells expose and secrete an oxidized form of membrane-bound vimentin as revealed by a natural polyreactive antibody.

Authors:  David Frescas; Christelle M Roux; Semra Aygun-Sunar; Anatoli S Gleiberman; Peter Krasnov; Oleg V Kurnasov; Evguenia Strom; Lauren P Virtuoso; Michelle Wrobel; Andrei L Osterman; Marina P Antoch; Vadim Mett; Olga B Chernova; Andrei V Gudkov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The role of DNA base excision repair in brain homeostasis and disease.

Authors:  Mansour Akbari; Marya Morevati; Deborah Croteau; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-05-01

5.  Deoxyuridine in DNA has an inhibitory and promutagenic effect on RNA transcription by diverse RNA polymerases.

Authors:  Junru Cui; Anthony Gizzi; James T Stivers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Excision of uracil from DNA by hSMUG1 includes strand incision and processing.

Authors:  Marina Alexeeva; Marivi N Moen; Kristin Grøsvik; Almaz N Tesfahun; Xiang Ming Xu; Izaskun Muruzábal-Lecumberri; Kristine M Olsen; Anette Rasmussen; Peter Ruoff; Finn Kirpekar; Arne Klungland; Svein Bjelland
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Hypermutation in human cancer genomes: footprints and mechanisms.

Authors:  Steven A Roberts; Dmitry A Gordenin
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 8.  CREBBP and p300 lysine acetyl transferases in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Ilaria Dutto; Claudia Scalera; Ennio Prosperi
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  AID-associated DNA repair pathways regulate malignant transformation in a murine model of BCL6-driven diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Xiwen Gu; Carmen J Booth; Zongzhi Liu; Matthew P Strout
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  APOBEC3A associates with human papillomavirus genome integration in oropharyngeal cancers.

Authors:  S Kondo; K Wakae; N Wakisaka; Y Nakanishi; K Ishikawa; T Komori; M Moriyama-Kita; K Endo; S Murono; Z Wang; K Kitamura; T Nishiyama; K Yamaguchi; S Shigenobu; M Muramatsu; T Yoshizaki
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.