Literature DB >> 24746782

Failure to perceive clinical events: an under-recognised source of error.

Paul R Greig1, Helen Higham2, Anna C Nobre3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Attentional focus narrows as individuals concentrate on tasks. Missing an event that would otherwise appear obvious is termed a perceptual error. These forms of perceptual failure are well-recognised in psychological literature, but little attention has been paid to them in medicine. Cognitive workload and expertise modulate risk, although how these factors interplay in practice is unclear. This video-based experiment was designed to explore the hypothesis that perceptual errors affect clinicians.
METHODS: 142 volunteers with varying levels of experience of adult resuscitation were shown a short video depicting a simulated cardiac arrest. This video included a series of change-events designed to elicit perceptual errors. The experiment was conducted on-line, with participants watching the video and then responding via combinations of open-ended free-text and directed questioning.
RESULTS: 141 people experienced at least a single perceptual error. Even the most clinically significant event (disconnection of the patient's oxygen supply) was missed by three in four viewers. Although expertise was associated with increased likelihood of detecting an occurrence, even highly significant events were missed by up to two thirds of the most experienced observers. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates, for the first time, that perceptual errors occur during healthcare-relevant scenarios at significant levels. Events such as an oxygen malfunction would meaningfully affect patient outcome and, although expertise conferred some advantages, events were still missed more often than not. Data acquisition is fundamental to good-quality situational awareness. These results suggest perceptual error may be a contributor to adverse events in practice.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult resuscitation; Experimental psychology; Inattentional blindness; Non-technical skill; Perceptual error; Situational awareness

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24746782     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.03.316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  3 in total

1.  Don't blink: inattentional blindness in radiology report interpretation.

Authors:  Malcolm M Kates; Patrick O Perche; Rebecca J Beyth; David E Winchester
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2021-11-26

2.  Avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study.

Authors:  Olivier Garot; Julian Rössler; Juliane Pfarr; Michael T Ganter; Donat R Spahn; Christoph B Nöthiger; David W Tscholl
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Does Expertise Reduce Rates of Inattentional Blindness? A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Malin Ekelund; Hanna Fernsund; Simon Karlsson; Erik Mac Giolla
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.490

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.