Literature DB >> 24746606

Supervised methods for detection and segmentation of tissues in clinical lumbar MRI.

Subarna Ghosh1, Vipin Chaudhary2.   

Abstract

Lower back pain (LBP) is widely prevalent all over the world and more than 80% of the people suffer from LBP at some point of their lives. Moreover, a shortage of radiologists is the most pressing cause for the need of CAD (computer-aided diagnosis) systems. Automatic localization and labeling of intervertebral discs from lumbar MRI is the first step towards computer-aided diagnosis of lower back ailments. Subsequently, for diagnosis and characterization (quantification and localization) of abnormalities like disc herniation and stenosis, a completely automatic segmentation of intervertebral discs and the dural sac is extremely important. Contribution of this paper towards clinical CAD systems is two-fold. First, we propose a method to automatically detect all visible intervertebral discs in clinical sagittal MRI using heuristics and machine learning techniques. We provide a novel end-to-end framework that outputs a tight bounding box for each disc, instead of simply marking the centroid of discs, as has been the trend in the recent past. Second, we propose a method to simultaneously segment all the tissues (vertebrae, intervertebral disc, dural sac and background) in a lumbar sagittal MRI, using an auto-context approach instead of any explicit shape features or models. Past work tackles the lumbar segmentation problem on a tissue/organ basis, and which tend to perform poorly in clinical scans due to high variability in appearance. We, on the other hand, train a series of robust classifiers (random forests) using image features and sparsely sampled context features, which implicitly represent the shape and configuration of the image. Both these methods have been tested on a huge clinical dataset comprising of 212 cases and show very promising results for both disc detection (98% disc localization accuracy and 2.08mm mean deviation) and sagittal MRI segmentation (dice similarity indices of 0.87 and 0.84 for the dural sac and the inter-vertebral disc, respectively).
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical lumbar MRI; Computer-aided diagnosis; Dural sac segmentation; Intervertebral disc segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24746606     DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph        ISSN: 0895-6111            Impact factor:   4.790


  12 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Feasibility of Deep Learning Algorithms for Reporting in Routine Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe LewandrowskI; Narendran Muraleedharan; Steven Allen Eddy; Vikram Sobti; Brian D Reece; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Sandeep Shah
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

3.  Population reference range for developmental lumbar spinal canal size.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Junbin Huang; Sheung-Wai Law; Fan Xiao; Jason Chi Shun Leung; Defeng Wang; Lin Shi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

4.  Artificial Intelligence Comparison of the Radiologist Report With Endoscopic Predictors of Successful Transforaminal Decompression for Painful Conditions of the Lumber Spine: Application of Deep Learning Algorithm Interpretation of Routine Lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Narendran Muraleedharan; Steven Allen Eddy; Vikram Sobti; Brian D Reece; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Sandeep Shah
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-11-18

5.  Automated selection of mid-height intervertebral disc slice in traverse lumbar spine MRI using a combination of deep learning feature and machine learning classifier.

Authors:  Friska Natalia; Julio Christian Young; Nunik Afriliana; Hira Meidia; Reyhan Eddy Yunus; Sud Sudirman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence in spine surgery.

Authors:  Ahmed Benzakour; Pavlos Altsitzioglou; Jean Michel Lemée; Alaaeldin Ahmad; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Thami Benzakour
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 7.  Current development and prospects of deep learning in spine image analysis: a literature review.

Authors:  Biao Qu; Jianpeng Cao; Chen Qian; Jinyu Wu; Jianzhong Lin; Liansheng Wang; Lin Ou-Yang; Yongfa Chen; Liyue Yan; Qing Hong; Gaofeng Zheng; Xiaobo Qu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

8.  The current role and future directions of imaging in failed back surgery syndrome patients: an educational review.

Authors:  Richard L Witkam; Constantinus F Buckens; Johan W M van Goethem; Kris C P Vissers; Dylan J H A Henssen
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-07-15

9.  Reliability Analysis of Deep Learning Algorithms for Reporting of Routine Lumbar MRI Scans.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Narendran Muraleedharan; Steven Allen Eddy; Vikram Sobti; Brian D Reece; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Sandeep Shah
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

10.  A method of localization and segmentation of intervertebral discs in spine MRI based on Gabor filter bank.

Authors:  Xinjian Zhu; Xuan He; Pin Wang; Qinghua He; Dandan Gao; Jiwei Cheng; Baoming Wu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.