Literature DB >> 24746407

Test re-test reliability of centre of pressure measures during standing balance in individuals with knee osteoarthritis.

Judit Takacs1, Mark G Carpenter2, S Jayne Garland1, Michael A Hunt3.   

Abstract

Assessment of changes in standing balance following an intervention requires accurate measurement of balance parameters. The reliability of centre of pressure measures of balance during single-leg standing has not been reported in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to assess the test re-test reliability of force platform centre of pressure measures during single-leg standing in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Twenty-five adults with radiographic evidence of knee osteoarthritis performed single-leg standing balance trials on a laboratory-grade force platform on two occasions, no more than 14 days apart. Participants were asked to stand on their more symptomatic limb for three, ten second trials. Centre of pressure measures collected included: standard deviation in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions, mean path length, velocity, and area. The mean of the three trials was calculated. Intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, Bland and Altman plots and the minimum detectable change were calculated. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.54 to 0.87, suggesting mixed reliability of measures. Reliability was lowest for the centre of pressure area (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.54), and highest for centre of pressure velocity and path length (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.87 for both). Standard error of measurement values were low for standard deviation in the mediolateral direction and high for centre of pressure area. These results suggest that centre of pressure values, in particular path length and velocity, are appropriate for assessment of standing balance in people with medial knee osteoarthritis.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centre of pressure; Osteoarthritis; Reliability; Standing balance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24746407     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  6 in total

1.  Clinician's Commentary on Akhbari et al.(1).

Authors:  Karl Zabjek
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Balance Evaluation and Gait Analysis After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy.

Authors:  Menekşe Karahan; Mert Özcan; Bülent Sabri Cığalı
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Evaluation of the Wii Balance Board for walking aids prediction: proof-of-concept study in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yong-Hao Pua; Ross A Clark; Peck-Hoon Ong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Reliability analysis of a sensitive and independent stabilometry parameter set.

Authors:  Gergely Nagymáté; Zsanett Orlovits; Rita M Kiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of the spine functional index.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Mokhtarinia; Azadeh Hosseini; Azam Maleki-Ghahfarokhi; Charles Philip Gabel; Majid Zohrabi
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  The Efficacy of Backward Walking on Static Stability, Proprioception, Pain, and Physical Function of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Zehua Chen; Xiangling Ye; Yi Wang; Zhen Shen; Jiatao Wu; Weijian Chen; Tao Jiang; Huai Wu; Xuemeng Xu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.629

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.