Literature DB >> 24746384

Assessment of three-dimensional nasolabial response to Le Fort I advancement.

Philipp Metzler1, Erik J Geiger1, Christopher C Chang1, Irin Sirisoontorn2, Derek M Steinbacher3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Le Fort I advancement induces soft tissue changes to the nasolabial region. The correlation of sagittal skeletal movement to soft tissue alteration has been studied using 2D methods. However, the influence of maxillary advancement has not been adequately assessed using three-dimensional means. The purpose of this study is to analyze nasolabial changes following Le Fort I advancement using 3D photometric measurements.
METHODS: Patient demographic information and their amount of advancement were tabulated. Pre- and postoperative 3D photographs (3D VECTRA photosystem, Canfield, Fairfield, NJ) were recorded. Nasolabial anthropometric measurements were performed using the corresponding 3D post-processing software (Mirror). Six month minimum follow-up elapsed before final evaluation.
RESULTS: Forty-four 3D photo data sets were included. Mean maxillary advancement was 5.5 (±1.9) mm. Male/female ratio was 0.7 with a mean age of 16.7 years. Significant increases (p < 0.0001) were seen in the alar base, alar widths, nostril width, and in the soft triangle and lateral alar angles. Significant decreases (p < 0.0001) were noted in the nasofrontal angle and in nostril height. A significant (p < 0.05) increase of the nasal tip, columella and upper lip projection was seen. Philtral height showed no significant changes (p > 0.05) after maxillary advancement. No significant correlation (p > 0.05) between the degree of soft tissue changes and the amount of maxillary advancement was found.
CONCLUSION: Le Fort I advancement significantly impacts the nasolabial soft tissue envelope. The 3D soft tissue changes are predictable and similar for any advancement up to 10 mm.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropometric; Le Fort I; Nasolabial; Three-dimensional

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24746384     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

Review 1.  Review of nasal changes with maxillary orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Leila Khamashta-Ledezma; Farhad B Naini; Mehmet Manisali
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2017-12-02

2.  Virtual Surgical Planning: The Pearls and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Johnny I Efanov; Andrée-Anne Roy; Ke N Huang; Daniel E Borsuk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-01-17

3.  A machine learning framework for automated diagnosis and computer-assisted planning in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Paul G M Knoops; Athanasios Papaioannou; Alessandro Borghi; Richard W F Breakey; Alexander T Wilson; Owase Jeelani; Stefanos Zafeiriou; Derek Steinbacher; Bonnie L Padwa; David J Dunaway; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Three-dimensional Nasolabial Morphologic Alterations Following Le Fort I.

Authors:  Christopher R DeSesa; Philip Metzler; Rajendra Sawh-Martinez; Derek M Steinbacher
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-08-17

5.  Three dimensional evaluation of soft tissue after orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Junho Jung; Chi-Heun Lee; Jung-Woo Lee; Byung-Joon Choi
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Long-Term Nasal Growth after Primary Rhinoplasty for Bilateral Cleft Lip Nose Deformity: A Three-Dimensional Photogrammetric Study with Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Hyung Joon Seo; Rafael Denadai; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.