Literature DB >> 24746196

EGFR expression in vulvar cancer: clinical implications and tumor heterogeneity.

Beatriz de Melo Maia1, Adriana Mazega Fontes1, André Mourão Lavorato-Rocha1, Iara Sant'Ana Rodrigues1, Louise de Brot2, Glauco Baiocchi3, Monica Maria Stiepcich4, Fernando Augusto Soares2, Rafael Malagoli Rocha5.   

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 150 cases of invasive vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. In addition, gene copy number status by fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed in a smaller set of samples. Results were correlated with patient's clinical data and prognostic factors. EGFR overexpression (2+ and 3+) was observed on the membrane in 24.66% and 21.33% of all cases, respectively. Higher EGFR expression was associated with depth of invasion (P = .0409) and disease recurrence (P = .0401). Cytoplasm staining was found in 21.33% of the cases and was associated with absence of nodal metastasis (P = .0061) and better survival (P = .0199). Intratumor heterogeneity of EGFR IHC staining was frequently observed (55.33%) and was associated with the presence of nodal metastasis (P = .0207) and tumor invasion (P = .0161). Worse survival outcomes have been demonstrated in tumors with EGFR heterogeneity (P = .0434). EGFR gene status evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization did not correlate with protein expression evaluated by IHC. In conclusion, EGFR cytoplasm staining has no link with poorer outcome; still, this pattern of staining is even more related to better prognosis. EGFR heterogeneity of staining correlated with more aggressive tumors, and presented to be an important marker of poor prognosis in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. The usage of small biopsies or even tissue microarrays for vulvar cancer evaluation should be carefully reconsidered for the assessment of EGFR as the results may be misleading. Protein overexpression may be independent on gene amplification, showing that other molecular mechanisms than copy number variation may regulate protein expression of EGFR in vulvar cancer.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EGFR; FISH; Immunohistochemistry; Prognosis; Vulvar carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24746196     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of the expression levels of molecular markers among the peripheral area and central area of primary tumor and metastatic lymph node tumor in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  Hibiki Udagawa; Genichiro Ishii; Masahiro Morise; Shigeki Umemura; Shingo Matsumoto; Kiyotaka Yoh; Seiji Niho; Hironobu Ohmatsu; Masahiro Tsuboi; Koichi Goto; Atsushi Ochiai; Yuichiro Ohe
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  CD274 (PD-L1), CDKN2A (p16), TP53, and EGFR immunohistochemical profile in primary, recurrent and metastatic vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Sofia Lérias; Susana Esteves; Fernanda Silva; Mário Cunha; Daniela Cochicho; Luís Martins; Ana Félix
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Aquaporin-8 mediates human esophageal cancer Eca-109 cell migration via the EGFR-Erk1/2 pathway.

Authors:  Heng Chang; Yong-Hua Shi; Tuo-Kan Talaf; Chen Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-10-15

4.  EGFR expression in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Seok Ju Park; Mi Jin Gu; Dong Shik Lee; Sung Soo Yun; Hong Jin Kim; Joon Hyuk Choi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-07-01

Review 5.  Molecular events in the pathogenesis of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Deyin Xing; Oluwole Fadare
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  ROCK1 as a novel prognostic marker in vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Erica M Akagi; André M Lavorato-Rocha; Beatriz de Melo Maia; Iara S Rodrigues; Kátia C Carvalho; Monica M Stiepcich; Glauco Baiocchi; Yukie Sato-Kuwabara; Silvia R Rogatto; Fernando A Soares; Rafael M Rocha
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Selecting Tumor-Specific Molecular Targets in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Paving the Way for Image-Guided Pancreatic Surgery.

Authors:  Susanna W L de Geus; Leonora S F Boogerd; Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg; J Sven D Mieog; Willemieke S F J Tummers; Hendrica A J M Prevoo; Cornelis F M Sier; Hans Morreau; Bert A Bonsing; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Peter J K Kuppen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  MicroRNA‑509 acts as a tumor suppressor in tongue squamous cell carcinoma by targeting epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Chao Hou; Yan Dong; Fenghe Zhang; Bo Du
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.952

Review 9.  Hormonal Therapy for Gynecological Cancers: How Far Has Science Progressed toward Clinical Applications?

Authors:  Saikat Mitra; Mashia Subha Lami; Avoy Ghosh; Rajib Das; Trina Ekawati Tallei; Fahadul Islam; Kuldeep Dhama; M Yasmin Begum; Afaf Aldahish; Kumarappan Chidambaram; Talha Bin Emran
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Assessment of TSPAN Expression Profile and Their Role in the VSCC Prognosis.

Authors:  Kelly Pedrozo Ferreira; Bruna Cristine de Almeida; Laura Gonzalez Dos Anjos; Glauco Baiocchi; Fernando Augusto Soares; Rafael Malagoli Rocha; Edmund Chada Baracat; Andrey Senos Dobroff; Katia Candido Carvalho
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.