Literature DB >> 24746134

Survey of preweaning dairy calf-rearing practices in Czech dairy herds.

S Staněk1, V Zink2, O Doležal3, L Štolc4.   

Abstract

It is important to describe weaknesses in rearing calves not only to improve their welfare, but also to detect areas where current scientific knowledge is poorly integrated into practice. A survey of preweaning calf-rearing practices was conducted using a farmer questionnaire. The survey included 136 farms, representing 11.9% of all dairy cows in the Czech Republic. Mean herd size (± standard deviation) was 326 ± 131.4 cows, and mean milk production 7,413 ± 1,389.5 kg per cow per year. We evaluated 59 farms with Holsteins (H) and 77 with the Czech Fleckvieh breed (C). The survey revealed that (1) calving in group pens predominated (67.6% of farms); (2) no disinfection of calf navels occurred on 11.8% of herds; (3) pooled colostrum was fed on 15.4% of farms; (4) colostrum quality was controlled on only 44.1% of farms, and only 73.5% of farms had reserve colostrum stocks; (5) nonmarket waste milk was fed in 64.7% of herds but it was pasteurized in only in 6.8% of herds and acidified in 35.2% of herds; (6) milk replacer was mixed with nonmarket waste milk on 52.9% of farms; (7) 58.8% of farms enabled calves to obtain milk by sucking and 41.2% by drinking from a bucket; (8) the main criterion in weaning was calf age (61.7%), followed by acceptance of starter and concentrated feed (19.9%) and lack of housing capacity (18.4%); and (9) newborn calves were individually housed on 96.7% of farms and group-housed on 3.3% of farms. The most marked differences in calf-rearing management between Holstein and Czech Fleckvieh farms were (1) a higher proportion of operations calving in tie-stalls or stanchions in C (6.5%) versus H (1.7%) farms; (2) a higher proportion of untreated navels on C (15.6%) versus H (6.8%) farms; (3) a lower proportion of C (11.7%) versus H (20.4%) farms feeding pooled colostrum; (4) a lower proportion of C (39%) versus H (50.9%) farms monitoring colostrum quality; (5) sucking milk from nipple buckets predominated (61%) on C farms, whereas drinking from an open bucket was most common (64.4%) on H farms; (6) age was the main criterion in weaning calves of both breeds (C farms: 55.8%, H farms: 69.5%), whereas the second most important criterion was lack of housing capacity (28.6% of farms) on C farms and the amount of consumed starter (25.4%) on H farms. We observed a difference in duration of colostrum period between C herds (median 5d) and H herds (median 4d). A tendency was observed for age of calves at weaning (C herds: median at 9.1 wk, H herds: median at 10 wk).
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calf; farm management; rearing; welfare

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24746134     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  9 in total

1.  Directed Calf Raising in the Conditions of Adaptive Technology.

Authors:  D A Baimukanov; V G Semenov; N B Seidaliyev; V G Tyurin; S A Musayev
Journal:  Arch Razi Inst       Date:  2021-11-30

2.  A survey of pre-weaning calf management in Norwegian dairy herds.

Authors:  Julie Føske Johnsen; Ingrid Hunter Holmøy; Ane Nødtvedt; Cecilie Marie Mejdell
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.695

3.  Pyrosequencing reveals diverse fecal microbiota in Simmental calves during early development.

Authors:  Daniela Klein-Jöbstl; Elisa Schornsteiner; Evelyne Mann; Martin Wagner; Marc Drillich; Stephan Schmitz-Esser
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  A survey of management practices that influence performance and welfare of dairy calves reared in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Maria J Hötzel; Cibele Longo; Lucas F Balcão; Clarissa S Cardoso; João H C Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Calf health from birth to weaning - an update.

Authors:  Ingrid Lorenz
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.146

6.  Swiss Dairy Farmers' Perceptions Surrounding the Disposal of Waste Milk Containing Antibiotic Residues and Antibiotic Resistance.

Authors:  Véronique Bernier Gosselin; Vivianne H M Visschers; Michèle Bodmer; Mireille Meylan
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-26

7.  Indication of social buffering in disbudded calves.

Authors:  Katarína Bučková; Ágnes Moravcsíková; Radka Šárová; Radko Rajmon; Marek Špinka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Results of an online questionnaire to survey calf management practices on dairy cattle breeding farms in Austria and to estimate differences in disease incidences depending on farm structure and management practices.

Authors:  Daniela Klein-Jöbstl; Tim Arnholdt; Franz Sturmlechner; Michael Iwersen; Marc Drillich
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 1.695

9.  Pair housing makes calves more optimistic.

Authors:  Katarína Bučková; Marek Špinka; Sara Hintze
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.