Literature DB >> 24745709

Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data.

Bart Depreitere1, Fabian Güiza, Greet Van den Berghe, Martin U Schuhmann, Gottlieb Maier, Ian Piper, Geert Meyfroidt.   

Abstract

OBJECT: In severe traumatic brain injury, a universal target for cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) has been abandoned. Attempts to identify a dynamic CPP target based on the patient's cerebrovascular autoregulatory capacity have been promising so far. Bedside monitoring of pressure autoregulatory capacity has become possible by a number of methods, Czosnyka's pressure reactivity index (PRx) being the most frequently used. The PRx is calculated as the moving correlation coefficient between 40 consecutive 5-second averages of intracranial pressure (ICP) and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) values. Plotting PRx against CPP produces a U-shaped curve in roughly two-thirds of monitoring time, with the bottom of this curve representing a CPP range corresponding with optimal autoregulatory capacity (CPPopt). In retrospective series, keeping CPP close to CPPopt corresponded with better outcomes. Monitoring of PRx requires high-frequency signal processing. The aim of the present study is to investigate how the processing of the information on cerebrovascular pressure reactivity that can be obtained from routine minute-by-minute ICP and MABP data can be enhanced to enable CPPopt recommendations that do not differ from those obtained by the PRx method, show the same associations with outcome, and can be generated in more than two-thirds of monitoring time.
METHODS: The low-frequency autoregulation index (LAx) was defined as the moving minute-by-minute ICP/MABP correlation coefficient calculated over time intervals varying from 3 to 120 minutes. The CPPopt calculation was based on LAx-CPP plots and done for time windows between 1 and 24 hours and for each LAx type. The resulting matrix of CPPopts were then averaged in a weighted manner, with the weight based on the goodness of fit of a U-shape and the lower value of the LAx corresponding to the U-bottom, to result in a final CPPopt recommendation. The association between actual CPP/CPPopt and outcome was assessed in the multicenter Brain Monitoring with Information Technology Research Group (BrainIT) database (n = 180). In the Leuven-Tübingen database (60-Hz waveform data, n = 21), LAx- and PRx-based CPPopts were compared.
RESULTS: In the BrainIT database, CPPopt recommendations were generated in 95% of monitoring time. Actual CPP being close to LAx-based CPPopt was associated with increased survival. In a multivariate model using the Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury (CRASH) model as covariates, the average absolute difference between actual CPP and CPPopt was independently associated with increased mortality. In the high-frequency data set no significant difference was observed between PRx-based and LAx-based CPPopts. The new method issued a CPPopt recommendation in 97% of monitoring time, as opposed to 44% for PRx-based CPPopt.
CONCLUSIONS: Minute-by-minute ICP/MABP data contain relevant information for autoregulation monitoring. In this study, the authors' new method based on minute-by-minute data resolution allowed for CPPopt calculation in nearly the entire monitoring time. This will facilitate the use of pressure reactivity monitoring in all ICUs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BrainIT = Brain Monitoring with Information Technology Research Group; CBF = cerebral blood flow; CPP = cerebral perfusion pressure; CPPopt = optimal CPP; CRASH = Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury; DATACAR = Dynamic Adaptive Target of Active Cerebral Autoregulation; GOS = Glasgow Outcome Scale; ICP = intracranial pressure; IQR = interquartile range; L-PRx = low-frequency pressure reactivity index; LAx = low-resolution autoregulation index; MABP = mean arterial blood pressure; Mx = mean arterial Doppler flow velocity based autoregulation index; PRx = pressure reactivity index; RMSE = root mean squared error; TBI = traumatic brain injury; autoregulation; cerebral perfusion pressure; intracranial pressure; traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24745709     DOI: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  35 in total

Review 1.  Translational approach towards determining the role of cerebral autoregulation in outcome after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  William M Armstead; Monica S Vavilala
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Wavelet pressure reactivity index: a validation study.

Authors:  Xiuyun Liu; Marek Czosnyka; Joseph Donnelly; Danilo Cardim; Manuel Cabeleira; Peter J Hutchinson; Xiao Hu; Peter Smielewski; Ken Brady
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation in Sepsis for the Intensivist: Why Its Monitoring May Be the Future of Individualized Care.

Authors:  Carrie M Goodson; Kathryn Rosenblatt; Lucia Rivera-Lara; Paul Nyquist; Charles W Hogue
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.510

4.  Visualizing the pressure and time burden of intracranial hypertension in adult and paediatric traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Fabian Güiza; Bart Depreitere; Ian Piper; Giuseppe Citerio; Iain Chambers; Patricia A Jones; Tsz-Yan Milly Lo; Per Enblad; Pelle Nillson; Bart Feyen; Philippe Jorens; Andrew Maas; Martin U Schuhmann; Rob Donald; Laura Moss; Greet Van den Berghe; Geert Meyfroidt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Role of Microvascular Disruption in Brain Damage from Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Aric F Logsdon; Brandon P Lucke-Wold; Ryan C Turner; Jason D Huber; Charles L Rosen; James W Simpkins
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 9.090

6.  Impact of Arterial Carbon Dioxide and Oxygen Content on Cerebral Autoregulation Monitoring Among Children Supported by ECMO.

Authors:  Nicolas Joram; Erta Beqiri; Stefano Pezzato; Moscatelli Andrea; Chiara Robba; Jean-Michel Liet; Alexis Chenouard; Pierre Bourgoin; Marek Czosnyka; Pierre-Louis Léger; Peter Smielewski
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Continuous Assessment of "Optimal" Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cohort Study of Feasibility, Reliability, and Relation to Outcome.

Authors:  Andreas H Kramer; Philippe L Couillard; David A Zygun; Marcel J Aries; Clare N Gallagher
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 8.  Neuroprotective measures in children with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Shruti Agrawal; Ricardo Garcia Branco
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-02-04

Review 9.  Brain Multimodality Monitoring: Updated Perspectives.

Authors:  David Roh; Soojin Park
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 10.  Autoregulation in the Neuro ICU.

Authors:  Anson Wang; Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez; Nils H Petersen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.