Literature DB >> 24744977

Hypoxia and tumor-associated macrophages: A deadly alliance in support of tumor progression.

Eva Van Overmeire1, Damya Laoui1, Jiri Keirsse1, Jo A Van Ginderachter1.   

Abstract

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) provide a significant contribution to tumor growth and metastasis. We demonstrated the existence of two main TAM subsets, differing in activation state and localization. Of these, M2-like TAMs reside in hypoxic regions of the tumor mass and can be used as targets for hypoxia tracers. This said, hypoxia does not regulate the differentiation of TAMs but finely tunes the activity of the M2-like population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD206; M1; M2; PHD2; hypoxia; molecular imaging; nanobody; tumor-associated macrophage

Year:  2014        PMID: 24744977      PMCID: PMC3989296          DOI: 10.4161/onci.27561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Introduction

The development of anticancer therapeutics over the past decades has been approached from a cancer cell-centric view, as the aim was to hit malignant cells while leaving untransformed cells largely unharmed. The features that discriminate cancer cells from most normal cells are an enhanced proliferation rate and the accumulation of mutated oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Hence, many of anticancer agents available to date were selected based on their ability to eradicate rapidly dividing cells and/or interfere with the function of oncogenes. However, the complexity of cancer reaches far beyond the biology of malignant cells alone, and includes several pathophysiological processes that have only recently been appreciated as important contributors to tumor progression. These processes, which might provide the targets for the next generation of anticancer therapeutics, include the influx of myeloid cells, in particular macrophages, within neoplastic lesions, and the hypoxic nature of the tumor microenvironment. Here, we will elaborate on the interplay between these two phenomena and the consequences for tumor growth and metastasis.

Tumor-Associated Macrophages Encompass Distinct Subpopulations

The importance of tumor-infiltrating macrophages for disease progression is highlighted by a recent meta-analysis of the literature, demonstrating a significant correlation between the density of CD68+ macrophages and reduced overall survival in patients affected by most solid tumors. Besides operating as inflammatory cells that detect and destroy invading pathogens through their phagocytic and cytotoxic activity, macrophages are also important guardians of tissue homeostasis. This trophic, anti-inflammatory role of macrophages is hijacked by developing tumors, which benefit not only from the local production of epithelial growth factors and angiogenic mediators but also from the avoidance of overt immunological responses. Consequently, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) contribute to tumor progression and metastasis by stimulating the ability of malignant cells to invade surrounding tissues, migrate and enter the circulation, by promoting angiogenesis and by subverting antitumor T-cell responses. Such a diversity of tasks suggests the existence of specialized TAM subpopulations. Moreover, the tumor topography is very dynamic and heterogeneous due to regional differences in the availability of oxygen and growth factors, in the organization of the extracellular matrix and in metabolic functions. The fact that macrophages display a remarkable adaptability to the microenvironment lends further support to the notion that distinct TAM subsets exist within a single neoplastic lesion. Employing several mouse tumor models, we found that neoplastic lesions are infiltrated with a heterogeneous population of myeloid cells comprising distinct immature and mature macrophage subsets. Based on the differential expression of MHC class II molecules, mature TAMs could be subdivided in 2 major subpopulations (Fig. 1). Interestingly, MHCIIlo TAMs resemble anti-inflammatory, alternatively activated M2 macrophages, as shown by elevated expression levels of mannose receptor, C type 1 (MRC1, also known as CD206), macrophage scavenger receptor 1 (MSR1, also known as CD204) and interleukin-4 receptor, α (IL4Rα, also known as CD124) and an increased arginase 1 enzymatic activity. These data were corroborated by an extensive gene expression analysis, confirming the M2-like nature of this TAM subset. Conversely, the genetic and surface marker expression profile of MHCIIhi TAMs are suggestive of an inflammatory M1-like phenotype. It could be hypothesized that MHCIIlo and MHCIIhi TAMs derive from different monocyte precursors. However, when we differentially labeled Ly6Chi vs. Ly6Clo blood monocytes, we found that the former differentiate into both TAM subsets. Hence, microenvironmental cues are responsible for skewing Ly6Chi monocyte differentiation into either MHCIIlo or MHCIIhi TAMs.

Figure 1. Heterogeneity of tumor-associated macrophages. Ly6Chi inflammatory or classical monocytes enter primary tumors and differentiate into MHCIIlo and MHCIIhi tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). MHCIIlo and MHCIIhi TAMs express high levels of M2-associated (i.e., CD124, CD204, CD206, and arginase 1) or M1-associated (i.e., CD11c, iNOS) markers, respectively. Notably, MHCIIlo TAMs associate with hypoxic tumor regions, while MHCIIhi TAMs are located in close proximity of blood vessels. Consequently, 99mTc-labeled anti-CD206 nanobodies that target MHCIIlo TAMs can be used as hypoxia tracers. In Egln1-haplodeficient mice, tumor oxygenation is improved as a result of vessel normalization. Data obtained in this model demonstrate that hypoxia does not alter the abundance of M2-like or M1-like TAMs, but increases the expression of angiogenic and metabolic proteins, including VEGFA, GLUT1, and GLUT3 specifically in hypoxic MHCIIlo TAMs.

Figure 1. Heterogeneity of tumor-associated macrophages. Ly6Chi inflammatory or classical monocytes enter primary tumors and differentiate into MHCIIlo and MHCIIhi tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). MHCIIlo and MHCIIhi TAMs express high levels of M2-associated (i.e., CD124, CD204, CD206, and arginase 1) or M1-associated (i.e., CD11c, iNOS) markers, respectively. Notably, MHCIIlo TAMs associate with hypoxic tumor regions, while MHCIIhi TAMs are located in close proximity of blood vessels. Consequently, 99mTc-labeled anti-CD206 nanobodies that target MHCIIlo TAMs can be used as hypoxia tracers. In Egln1-haplodeficient mice, tumor oxygenation is improved as a result of vessel normalization. Data obtained in this model demonstrate that hypoxia does not alter the abundance of M2-like or M1-like TAMs, but increases the expression of angiogenic and metabolic proteins, including VEGFA, GLUT1, and GLUT3 specifically in hypoxic MHCIIlo TAMs.

Hypoxia as Driver of the Tumor-Supporting Functions of TAMs

We investigated whether hypoxia could be such a cue. Regions of chronic or cycling hypoxia (0.1–2% O2) are common in most solid tumors as a result of defective vascularization and intense metabolic activity. Upon O2 shortage, several intracellular prolyl hydroxylases (including those encoded by Egln1, Egln2, and Egln3) become inactive, which prevents the hydroxylation and degradation of the α chain of the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), a central mediator of hypoxic adaptation. Hypoxia promotes not only the invasiveness of malignant cells, but also chemo- and radioresistance, and is therefore very relevant from a clinical perspective. Macrophages are well known to infiltrate hypoxic tumor regions, but to which extent hypoxia influences the TAM phenotype was not clear until recently. By staining hypoxic tumor regions with pimonidazole, we demonstrated that most MHCIIhi TAMs are located outside of hypoxic microenvironments, while MHCIIlo TAMs exhibit a predilection for these areas (Fig. 1)., Interestingly, increasing the oxygenation of neoplastic lesions by vessel normalization in Egln1 haplodeficient mice does not alter the abundance, nor the M1/M2 distribution of TAM subsets. Rather, hypoxia regulates a subset of proteins involved in metabolism and angiogenesis, including vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), solute carrier family 2, member 1 (SCL2A1, also known as GLUT1), SCL2A3 (also known as GLUT3) and nitric oxide synthase 2, inducible (NOS2, also known as iNOS) specifically in MHCIIlo TAMs, thereby increasing their angiogenic functions. Hence, hypoxia is not the main driver of TAM differentiation, but rather fine tunes the biological activity of the M2-like subpopulation.

Applicability of These Findings

Hypoxia imaging is becoming increasingly important for the individualization of chemoradiotherapy, but hypoxia tracers need improvement. All hypoxia tracers available to date are nitroimidazoles, which become detectable below a specific threshold of partial O2 pressure (pO2) and thus only provide a discriminative binary (yes-or-no) signal. We considered the possibility of imaging TAMs that reside in hypoxic tumor regions, rather than hypoxia itself, (at least theoretically) providing quantitative data on local hypoxia. To this aim, we generated nanobodies (Nbs)-the smallest available antigen-binding fragments derived from Camelid heavy-chain-only antibodies (15 kDa)-against CD206, which is highly expressed by hypoxic MHCIIlo TAMs. We demonstrated that monovalent 99mTc-labeled anti-CD206 Nbs allow for the fast and specific detection of CD206+ cells within neoplastic lesions, as shown by pinhole SPECT/Micro-CT imaging. Importantly, bivalent anti-CD206 Nbs penetrate tumors less efficiently than their monovalent counterparts, but rapidly occupy all extratumoral binding sites. Hence, the administration of excess unlabeled bivalent anti-CD206 Nbs provides a novel strategy for eliminating extratumoral noise while preserving the detection of tumor-associated CD206+ TAMs. Altogether, 99mTc-labeled CD206-specific tracers were validated for the molecular imaging of CD206+ TAMs, representing a novel diagnostic (and perhaps therapeutic) approach targeting the tumor stroma.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis.

Authors:  Bin-Zhi Qian; Jeffrey W Pollard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Different tumor microenvironments contain functionally distinct subsets of macrophages derived from Ly6C(high) monocytes.

Authors:  Kiavash Movahedi; Damya Laoui; Conny Gysemans; Martijn Baeten; Geert Stangé; Jan Van den Bossche; Matthias Mack; Daniel Pipeleers; Peter In't Veld; Patrick De Baetselier; Jo A Van Ginderachter
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Molecular imaging of hypoxia.

Authors:  Satish K Chitneni; Gregory M Palmer; Michael R Zalutsky; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Nanobody-based targeting of the macrophage mannose receptor for effective in vivo imaging of tumor-associated macrophages.

Authors:  Kiavash Movahedi; Steve Schoonooghe; Damya Laoui; Isabelle Houbracken; Wim Waelput; Karine Breckpot; Luc Bouwens; Tony Lahoutte; Patrick De Baetselier; Geert Raes; Nick Devoogdt; Jo A Van Ginderachter
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Imaging cycling tumor hypoxia.

Authors:  Shingo Matsumoto; Hironobu Yasui; James B Mitchell; Murali C Krishna
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Influence of tumour micro-environment heterogeneity on therapeutic response.

Authors:  Melissa R Junttila; Frederic J de Sauvage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Heterozygous deficiency of PHD2 restores tumor oxygenation and inhibits metastasis via endothelial normalization.

Authors:  Massimiliano Mazzone; Daniela Dettori; Rodrigo Leite de Oliveira; Sonja Loges; Thomas Schmidt; Bart Jonckx; Ya-Min Tian; Anthony A Lanahan; Patrick Pollard; Carmen Ruiz de Almodovar; Frederik De Smet; Stefan Vinckier; Julián Aragonés; Koen Debackere; Aernout Luttun; Sabine Wyns; Benedicte Jordan; Alberto Pisacane; Bernard Gallez; Maria Grazia Lampugnani; Elisabetta Dejana; Michael Simons; Peter Ratcliffe; Patrick Maxwell; Peter Carmeliet
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Mechanisms regulating the recruitment of macrophages into hypoxic areas of tumors and other ischemic tissues.

Authors:  Craig Murdoch; Athina Giannoudis; Claire E Lewis
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Tumor hypoxia does not drive differentiation of tumor-associated macrophages but rather fine-tunes the M2-like macrophage population.

Authors:  Damya Laoui; Eva Van Overmeire; Giusy Di Conza; Chiara Aldeni; Jiri Keirsse; Yannick Morias; Kiavash Movahedi; Isabelle Houbracken; Elio Schouppe; Yvon Elkrim; Oussama Karroum; Bénédicte Jordan; Peter Carmeliet; Conny Gysemans; Patrick De Baetselier; Massimiliano Mazzone; Jo A Van Ginderachter
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Prognostic significance of tumor-associated macrophages in solid tumor: a meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Qiong-wen Zhang; Lei Liu; Chang-yang Gong; Hua-shan Shi; Yun-hui Zeng; Xiao-ze Wang; Yu-wei Zhao; Yu-quan Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  16 in total

Review 1.  The contribution of tumor-associated macrophages in glioma neo-angiogenesis and implications for anti-angiogenic strategies.

Authors:  Changbin Zhu; Johan M Kros; Caroline Cheng; Dana Mustafa
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells to enhance natural killer cell-based immunotherapy.

Authors:  Shweta Joshi; Andrew Sharabi
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 13.400

Review 3.  Immunobiology of hepatocarcinogenesis: Ways to go or almost there?

Authors:  Pavan Patel; Steven E Schutzer; Nikolaos Pyrsopoulos
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-08-15

4.  Intratumoral Hypoxia Reduces IFN-γ-Mediated Immunity and MHC Class I Induction in a Preclinical Tumor Model.

Authors:  Aditi Murthy; Scott A Gerber; Cameron J Koch; Edith M Lord
Journal:  Immunohorizons       Date:  2019-04-29

Review 5.  Functional Relationship between Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor as Contributors to Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Damya Laoui; Eva Van Overmeire; Patrick De Baetselier; Jo A Van Ginderachter; Geert Raes
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Hypoxia primes human normal prostate epithelial cells and cancer cell lines for the NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasome activation.

Authors:  Ravichandran Panchanathan; Hongzhu Liu; Divaker Choubey
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-10

7.  Diverse in vivo effects of soluble and membrane-bound M-CSF on tumor-associated macrophages in lymphoma xenograft model.

Authors:  Jinfeng Liao; Wenli Feng; Rong Wang; Shihui Ma; Lina Wang; Xiao Yang; Feifei Yang; Yongmin Lin; Qian Ren; Guoguang Zheng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-01-12

8.  Tasquinimod triggers an early change in the polarization of tumor associated macrophages in the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Anders Olsson; Jessica Nakhlé; Anette Sundstedt; Pascale Plas; Anne-Laure Bauchet; Valérie Pierron; Luce Bruetschy; Adnan Deronic; Marie Törngren; David Liberg; Fabien Schmidlin; Tomas Leanderson
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 13.751

9.  Characterization of Arginase Expression in Glioma-Associated Microglia and Macrophages.

Authors:  Ian Zhang; Darya Alizadeh; Junling Liang; Leying Zhang; Hang Gao; Yanyan Song; Hui Ren; Mao Ouyang; Xiwei Wu; Massimo D'Apuzzo; Behnam Badie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Targeting tumor-associated macrophages to combat pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ran Cui; Wen Yue; Edmund C Lattime; Mark N Stein; Qing Xu; Xiang-Lin Tan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.