| Literature DB >> 24744477 |
M Malara1, E Hübner-Wozniak1, I Lewandowska1.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to examine the nutritional status of vitamin B1, B2, and B6 in respect to dietary intake of these vitamins and activity coefficients of the erythrocyte enzymes transketolase, glutathione reductase, and aspartic aminotransferase in young men and women with different physical activity levels. The participants of this study were 20 women and 20 men with high physical activity (groups HAW and HAM, respectively), and 20 women and 20 men with low physical activity (groups LAW and LAM, respectively). The intake of vitamins B1, B2, B6, proteins, and calorie content of the diet was based on the average of the 4-day dietary recalls. To assess nutritional status of vitamin B1, B2, and B6, the activity coefficients (α) of erythrocyte transketolase (ETK), erythrocyte glutathione reductase (EGR), and erythrocyte aspartic aminotransferase (EAST) were estimated in blood hemolysates. The intake of the studied vitamins in the diet was statistically significantly lower in the female groups compared with the respective male groups. Deficiency of vitamin B6 in the diet was present more often in women than in men (in terms of the recommended dietary allowances [RDA]). Values of the activity coefficient αETK indicated that none of the groups in this study suffered the risk of vitamin B1 deficiency. The value of the activity coefficient αEGR indicated that the groups of women and men with low physical activity were more prone to vitamin B2 deficiency compared with the high physical activity groups. The risk of vitamin B6 deficiency (αEAST) in both male groups was higher than in both female groups. The obtained results do not allow for unequivocal determination of the impact of sex and the level of physical activity on intake and nutritional status of vitamin B1, B2, and B6. Independently of sex and the level of physical activity, the women and men consumed insufficient quantities of vitamins B1 and B6, although this was not always related to increased values of corresponding activity coefficients.Entities:
Keywords: Vitamin intake; men; physical activity; vitamin nutritional status; women
Year: 2013 PMID: 24744477 PMCID: PMC3944584 DOI: 10.5604/20831862.1044430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Sport ISSN: 0860-021X Impact factor: 2.806
DIETARY REFERENCE VALUES FOR VITAMINS B1, B2, AND B6 FOR WOMEN AND MEN [15]
| Vitamin intake (mg · day-1) | Group | |
|---|---|---|
| Women | Men | |
| B1 | ||
| EAR | 0.9 | 1.1 |
| RDA | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| B2 | ||
| EAR | 0.9 | 1.1 |
| RDA | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| B6 | ||
| EAR | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| RDA | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Note: EAR – estimated average requirement, RDA – recommended dietary allowances
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBJECT GROUPS (MEAN ± SD)
| Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | HAW (n = 20) | HAM (n = 20) | LAW (n = 20) | LAM (n = 20) |
| Age (years) | 19.6 ± 0.7 | 19.9 ± 0.9 | 19.5 ± 0.6 | 19.8 ± 0.6 |
| Body height (cm) | 168.8 ± 5.7 | 182.7 ± 7.2 | 168.7 ± 4.9 | 179.7 ± 7.6 |
| Body mass (kg) | 58.9 ± 5.6 | 77.4 ± 7.2 | 58.6 ± 4.9 | 75.7 ± 7.8 |
| BMI | 20.5 ± 1.1 | 23.2 ±1.9 | 20.5 ± 1.6 | 23.9 ± 3.3 |
| Training experience (years) | 7.9 ± 2.5 | 10.7 ± 3.2 | - | - |
| Physical activity (hours · week-1) | 11.2 | 13.9 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Note: HAW – women with high physical activity; HAM – men with high physical activity; LAW – women with low physical activity; LAM – men with low physical activity
Physical activity prescribed by the physical education programme of study
Significantly lower compared with HAM group: p < 0.001
Significantly lower compared with LAM group (p < 0.001)
Significantly lower compared with HAM group p < 0.01
Significantly higher compared with LAW group (p < 0.001)
Significantly higher compared with LAM group (p < 0.001)
VITAMIN B1, B2, AND B6 DAILY INTAKE IN WOMEN AND MEN (MEAN ± SD)
| Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | HAW (n = 20) | HAM (n = 20) | LAW(n = 20) | LAM (n = 20) |
| B1 | ||||
| mg · day-1 | 0.90 ± 0.20 | 1.16 ± 0.19 | 0.95 ± 0.16 | 1.19 ± 0.23 |
| mg · day-1 · 1000 kcal-1 | 0.44 ± 0.12 | 0.36 ± 0.07 | 0.44 ± 0.09 | 0.41 ± 0.07 |
| B2 | ||||
| mg · day-1 | 1.83 ± 0.27 | 2.42 ± 0.54 | 1.63 ± 0.33 | 2.22 ± 0.37 |
| B6 | ||||
| mg · day-1 | 1.51 ± 0.28 | 2.38 ± 0.41 | 1.41 ± 0.24 | 2.20 ± 0.38 |
| mg · day-1 · g-1 protein | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
Note: See Table 2
Significant difference compared with HAM group: p < 0.001
Significantly lower compared with LAM group (p < 0.001)
Significant difference compared with HAM group: p < 0.01
Significantly higher compared with LAW group (p < 0.05)
PERCENTAGE OF INADEQUATE INTAKE OF VITAMINS B1, B2, AND B6 IN THE STUDIED GROUPS
| Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | HAW (n = 20) | HAM (n = 20) | LAW (n = 20) | LAM (n = 20) |
| B1 | ||||
| EAR | 11 | 6 (30) | 6 (30) | 7 (35) |
| RDA | 16 (80) | 13 (65) | 16 (80) | 13 (65) |
| B2 | ||||
| EAR | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| RDA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| B6 | ||||
| EAR | 2 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| RDA | 5 (25) | 0 (0) | 8 (40) | 0 (0) |
Note: See Table 2
See Table 1
Number of subjects
Percentage of subjects
Significantly higher compared with the HAM group (p < 0.05)
Significantly higher compared with the LAM group (p < 0.01)
ACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS FOR TRANSKETOLASE (αETK), GLUTATHIONE REDUCTASE (αERG), AND ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (αEAST) IN WOMEN AND MEN (MEAN ± SD)
| Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activity coefficient | HAW (n = 20) | HAM (n = 20) | LAW (n = 20) | LAM (n = 20) |
| αETK | 1.05 ± 0.05 | 1.05 ± 0.06 | 1.08 ± 0.06 | 1.03 ± 0.03 |
| αERG | 1.11 ± 0.07 | 1.09 ± 0.05 | 1.16 ± 0.11 | 1.13 ± 0.11 |
| αEAST | 1.63 ± 0.16 | 1.72 ± 0.14 | 1.66 ± 0.14 | 1.74 ± 0.12 |
Note: See Table 2
PERCENTAGE OF OCCURRENCE OF ACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS INDICATING DEFICIENCY OF VITAMINS B1, B2, AND B6 IN WOMEN AND MEN
| Activity coefficient | Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAW (n = 20) | HAM (n = 20) | LAW (n = 20) | LAM (n = 20) | |
| αETK (>1,25) | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| αERG (>1,20) | 2 (10) | 0 (0) | 7 (35) | 5 (25) |
| αEAST (>1,70) | 7 (35) | 11 (55) | 8 (40) | 12 (60) |
Note: See Table 2
Number of subjects
Percentage of group
Significantly lower compared with the LAM group (p < 0.05)