Literature DB >> 2474370

A pathologic assessment of tumor residue and stromal changes after intraarterial chemotherapy for head and neck carcinomas. A study on serial sections of the whole surgical specimen.

S Sulfaro1, S Frustaci, R Volpe, L Barzan, R Comoretto, S Monfardini, A Carbone.   

Abstract

Thirty-one patients with advanced, biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck were treated with intraarterial chemotherapy (IAC) and subsequent radical surgery. Cisplatin at 25 mg/d (4 hours of infusion) and bleomycin at 15 mg/d (20 hours of infusion) were administered for 10 consecutive days. Radical surgery was performed after clinical evaluation 2 weeks later. Clinical tumor regression (total disappearance or shrinkage of the tumor mass by more than 50%) was recorded in 28 of 31 (90.3%) patients. Tumor regression was then assessed pathologically using a procedure based on examination of large serial histologic sections of the whole surgical specimen. Tumor residue was classified pathologically according to the TNM categories: RO, no residual tumor (five cases [16.1%]); R1, microscopic residual tumor (tumor residue detectable only at the microscopic level; 12 cases [38.7%]); and R2, macroscopic residual tumor (tumor mass detectable also on the fresh or fixed specimen and/or by the naked eye on the stained tissue sections; 14 cases [45.2%]). Moreover, tumor cell and/or stromal changes possibly associated with tumor regression were found in 77.4% of the cases. Metastatic lymph nodes were found in 12 cases (38.7%), and regression changes were observed in most lymph node metastases. Only standardized, prospective pathologic protocols for the analysis of whole specimens by serial sections permit the assessment of existing tumor residue. The TNM classification of pathologic tumor residue and definitions that we used appear feasible and reliable enough in evaluating postchemotherapeutic tumor regression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2474370     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890901)64:5<994::aid-cncr2820640504>3.0.co;2-#

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  5 in total

1.  [Regression of oesophageal carcinomas after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: criteria of the histopathological evaluation].

Authors:  S E Baldus; S P Mönig; W Schröder; R Metzger; S Lang; T K Zirbes; J Thiele; R P Müller; H P Dienes; A H Hölscher; P M Schneider
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Tumour regression in non-small-cell lung cancer following neoadjuvant therapy. Histological assessment.

Authors:  K Junker; M Thomas; K Schulmann; F Klinke; U Bosse; K M Müller
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  A pathological study of tumour regression in oesophageal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  B Dunne; J V Reynolds; E Mulligan; A Kelly; M Griffin
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Selective intraarterial chemotherapy of tumors in the lingual artery territory by a new approach.

Authors:  A Simunek; A Krajina; A Hlava
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: does it have benefits for the surgeon in the treatment of advanced squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity?

Authors:  Lajos Olasz; József Szalma; Eniko Orsi; Tamás Tornóczky; Tamás Markó; Zoltán Nyárády
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.201

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.