Literature DB >> 24743603

Self-Interest Bias in Moral Judgments of Others' Actions.

Konrad Bocian1, Bogdan Wojciszke2.   

Abstract

The automatic and affective nature of moral judgments leads to the expectation that these judgments are biased by an observer's own interests. Although the idea of self-interest bias is old, it has never been directly tested with respect to the moral judgments of other individuals' behaviors. The participants of three experiments observed other individuals' counternormative behavior (breaking a rule or cheating for gain), which was judged as immoral. However, this judgment became much more lenient when the observers gained from the observed behavior. All three studies showed that the influence of self-interest on moral judgments was completely mediated by the observer's increased liking for the perpetrator of the immoral acts but not by changes in mood. When the participants were induced to dislike the perpetrator (in a moderation-of-process design), the self-interest bias disappeared. Implications for the intuitionist approach to moral judgment are discussed.
© 2014 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  egotistic bias; ethics; moral judgment; self-interest

Year:  2014        PMID: 24743603     DOI: 10.1177/0146167214529800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  9 in total

1.  Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying immoral decisions benefiting self or others.

Authors:  Chen Qu; Yang Hu; Zixuan Tang; Edmund Derrington; Jean-Claude Dreher
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Fraud and Understanding the Moral Mind: Need for Implementation of Organizational Characteristics into Behavioral Ethics.

Authors:  Petr Houdek
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Equity or equality? Moral judgments follow the money.

Authors:  Peter DeScioli; Maxim Massenkoff; Alex Shaw; Michael Bang Petersen; Robert Kurzban
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  How German and Italian Laypeople Reason about Distributive Shortages during COVID-19.

Authors:  Ronja Demel; Francesco Grassi; Yasaman Rafiee; Michael R Waldmann; Annekathrin Schacht
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  The boundary conditions of the liking bias in moral character judgments.

Authors:  Konrad Bocian; Katarzyna Myslinska Szarek; Katarzyna Miazek; Wieslaw Baryla; Bogdan Wojciszke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Why Do People (Not) Engage in Social Distancing? Proximate and Ultimate Analyses of Norm-Following During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  James O Norton; Kortnee C Evans; Ayten Yesim Semchenko; Laith Al-Shawaf; David M G Lewis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-23

7.  When do we care about political neutrality? The hypocritical nature of reaction to political bias.

Authors:  Omer Yair; Raanan Sulitzeanu-Kenan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Deciphering moral intuition: How agents, deeds, and consequences influence moral judgment.

Authors:  Veljko Dubljević; Sebastian Sattler; Eric Racine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Moderators of the Liking Bias in Judgments of Moral Character.

Authors:  Konrad Bocian; Wieslaw Baryla; Bogdan Wojciszke
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2021-05-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.