H K Uhthoff1, E Coletta, G Trudel. 1. University of Ottawa, Boneand Joint Research Lab, 451 Smyth Rd, Room 1319, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H8M5, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although many clinical and experimental investigations have shed light on muscle atrophy and intramuscular accumulation of fat after rotator cuff disruption, none have reported on their onset in the absence of muscle retraction. METHODS: In 30 rabbits, we detached one supraspinatus (SSP) tendon and repaired it immediately, thus preventing muscle retraction. The animals were killed in groups of 10 at one, two and six weeks. Both shoulders of 15 non-operated rabbits served as controls. We measured the weight and volume of SSP muscles and quantified the cross-sectional area of intramuscular fat (i-fat) histologically. RESULTS: There was significant loss of muscle weight and volume after one week (p = 0.004 and 0.003, respectively), and two weeks (both p < 0.001) in the experimental group; which recovered to control values after six weeks. I-fat accumulated one week after immediate repair, greater than in the control group and statistically significant at the mid-part of the muscle (mean 2.7% vs 1.5%, p = 0.008). I-fat continued to accumulate up to six weeks at all sites of the SSP muscle (all 3, p < 0.001). More fat accumulated closer to the musculotendinous junction than at the mid-part after two and six weeks (p = 0.012 and 0.019, respectively). CONCLUSION: Muscle atrophy and i-fat accumulation occur early after SSP tendon tear and immediate repair. While early repair benefitted muscle recovery, it did not prevent fat accumulation. SSP muscle retraction was not essential to the muscle alterations. The divergent evolution of muscle and fat points to different pathophysiologies. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:117-22.
OBJECTIVES: Although many clinical and experimental investigations have shed light on muscle atrophy and intramuscular accumulation of fat after rotator cuff disruption, none have reported on their onset in the absence of muscle retraction. METHODS: In 30 rabbits, we detached one supraspinatus (SSP) tendon and repaired it immediately, thus preventing muscle retraction. The animals were killed in groups of 10 at one, two and six weeks. Both shoulders of 15 non-operated rabbits served as controls. We measured the weight and volume of SSP muscles and quantified the cross-sectional area of intramuscular fat (i-fat) histologically. RESULTS: There was significant loss of muscle weight and volume after one week (p = 0.004 and 0.003, respectively), and two weeks (both p < 0.001) in the experimental group; which recovered to control values after six weeks. I-fat accumulated one week after immediate repair, greater than in the control group and statistically significant at the mid-part of the muscle (mean 2.7% vs 1.5%, p = 0.008). I-fat continued to accumulate up to six weeks at all sites of the SSP muscle (all 3, p < 0.001). More fat accumulated closer to the musculotendinous junction than at the mid-part after two and six weeks (p = 0.012 and 0.019, respectively). CONCLUSION:Muscle atrophy and i-fat accumulation occur early after SSP tendon tear and immediate repair. While early repair benefitted muscle recovery, it did not prevent fat accumulation. SSP muscle retraction was not essential to the muscle alterations. The divergent evolution of muscle and fat points to different pathophysiologies. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:117-22.
To elucidate the early appearance of muscle atrophy and intramuscular
fat (i-fat) accumulation after supraspinatus tendon tear.To measure the occurrence of these muscle changes in the absence
of muscle retractionTo investigate the possibility of reversal of these changes.Muscle atrophy and i-fat accumulation develop early after supraspinatus
tendon tear.Muscle retraction is not essential for the development of these
changes.Very early reattachment leads to recovery of muscle atrophy but
not fat accumulation.Direct reproducible measurements of early muscle changes.Very early reattachment reverses muscle atrophy.As in any animal model, the juxtaposition to the clinical situation
is a limitation.
Introduction
The pathology of rotator cuff tears continues to arouse the interest
of clinicians[1,2] and researchers[3-10] alike. In particular, the muscle
atrophy and accumulation of intramuscular fat (i-fat) in the torn
supraspinatus (SSP) muscle, as well as their clinical relevance,
has been investigated and discussed.[7,10-14] However, the timing
and evolution of muscle and i-fat changes, in particular when related
to the earliest moments of onset of muscle atrophy and of i-fat
accumulation, remain unanswered.[15] We
reported i-fat accumulation four, eight and 12 weeks after transection
of the SSP tendon.[14] Then,
Gayton et al[16] reported
on i-fat accumulation after transection of the SSP tendon in rabbits
that was present three months post-operatively, the earliest time point
of their investigation. In a recent study Rowshan et al[17] sectioned the
tendon of the subscapular muscle in rabbits and did not find any
evidence of muscle atrophy, nor of i-fat accumulation at two weeks.
After six weeks, however, both changes were present.Animal models have included surgical detachment of rotator cuff
tendons.[3,14,17-19] Whether
the SSP muscle alterations are related to the tendon tear, to retraction
of the SSP muscle or to both, is unclear. Retraction of the SSP muscle
may contribute to muscle atrophy by sarcomere loss through adaptive
shortening and to the fat accumulation.[20] Mechanical traction on the suprascapular
nerve (SSN) at the scapular notch brought about by SSP muscle retraction
may also contribute to the alterations.[21] The contribution of muscle retraction
to SSP muscle alterations is clinically important as it can influence
the timing of surgical repair of a SSP tendon tear; an earlier repair preventing
retraction may optimise clinical outcome.[22]To find out the onset, differential recovery and role of retraction
in muscle atrophy and i-fat accumulation, we devised an experiment
in rabbits in which the SSP tendons would be detached unilaterally,
and immediately reattached, to bring about the earliest possible
repair, thus precluding any muscle retraction. We determined the
volume and weight of the SSP muscles at one, two and six weeks post-operatively
and measured the presence of i-fat histologically at three levels
of the SSP muscles (proximal quarter, middle half, distal quarter)
at the same time points both in experimental and control shoulders.
We hypothesised that both muscle atrophy and i-fat accumulation
occur early after transection of the SSP tendon and develop in the
absence of muscle retraction.
Materials and Methods
Surgical repair of the rotator cuff
A total of 30 adult female white New Zealand rabbits (3.4 kg
to 4.3 kg) received a ketamine, midazolam, and glycopyrrolate injection
followed by isofluorane anesthesia pre-operatively. One shoulder
of each rabbit was operated, alternating right and left sides. The
protocol for the surgical detachment surgery has been described
in a previous publication.[14] Briefly,
a lateral skin incision followed by splitting of omovertebral and
deltoid muscles, exposed the SSP tendon at its insertion into the
greater tuberosity. The tendon was transected close to its insertion,
and any tendinous or fibrocartilaginous tissue still attached to
the greater tuberosity was removed. There was no retraction of the
tendon-muscle unit. The tendon was immediately reattached using
the following technique: a 2 x 2 x 5 mm bony trough was made between
the rim of the wall of the tuberosity and the articular cartilage
using a burr. Three 1 mm holes were drilled from the lateral aspect
of the greater tuberosity into the bony trough. Two nonabsorbable
3 - 0 prolene sutures were then placed as follows: the first thread
was passed first through the most proximal drill hole, then through
the tendon in a modified Mason-Allen fashion[23] and finally exited through the middle
drill hole. The second thread was passed first through the middle
drill hole, then passed through the tendon in a similar fashion
to the first suture and brought through the distal drill hole. Both sutures
were tied over the lateral aspect of the cortex, thus adapting easily
the tendon stump to the bony trough. The wound was closed in layers.
The shoulder was not immobilised post-operatively; the rabbits could
actively move their shoulder and they had free access to water and
food. Pain control was achieved with transdermal fentanyl for four
days and subcutaneous buprenorphine for three days. A total of 30
shoulders of 15 non-operated, weight and sex-matched rabbits, served
as controls.As the rabbits protected their operated forelimb for a few days,
a fact that could have led to an overuse of the non-operated forelimb
and thus may have influenced the muscle volume, we preferred to
use both shoulders of 15 non-operated weight- and sex-matched rabbits
as controls.
Specimen collection
The rabbits of the experimental group were killed with a pentobarbitaloverdose in three groups of 10, one group at one week and the other
groups at two and six weeks after surgery. The shoulders were dissected,
care being taken to remove the entire scapula in one piece including
the SSP muscle, its tendon and the proximal part of the humerus.
The SSP muscles were then carefully freed from the scapula, the
extramuscular fat was removed and weight and volume were determined.
Thereafter, the muscles were fixed for a minimum of one week in 4%
paraformaldehyde. Three cross-sectional blocks 2 mm wide were cut
at the proximal quarter, the mid-part and the distal quarter of
the muscle belly. The blocks were placed in an osmium tetroxide
solution on a rotating plate for one week. The solution was then
changed and blocks left in the solution for another week. The tissues
were then washed in a 50 ml centrifuge tube with water and placed thereafter
in 60% alcohol. The blocks were embedded in paraffin in the vacuum
oven, cut in 6 µm thin sections and counterstained with hematoxylin-eosin.
The transverse sections were photographed using a Pixelink Megapixel FireWire
camera (Vitana Corporation, Ottawa, Canada), mounted onto an Olympus
SZ61 dissection microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
The magnification used was x 6.7. Entire SSP muscle cross-sectional
areas were measured using ImageJ (1.34s, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland).[14] The
area of fat, stained black, was measured the same way using the
entire cross-sectional area.[14] The
percentage of the entire cross-sectional area
occupied by fat was established.The same post-mortem procedures were used for the 30 SSP muscles
of the 15 control rabbits. All measurements were automated and performed
randomly and blindly.
Statistical analysis
A database was built using SPSS statistical software version
20.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York). First we compared the muscle weight,
volume and i-fat of the experimental rabbits at one, two and six
weeks using a one-way ANOVA with post hoc Gabriel
tests. We then compared the control rabbits with the experimental
rabbits for each time point using a one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Hochberg’s
tests, due to the uneven sample size. Finally, the distal quarter
i-fat was compared with the mid-part and proximal quarters with
2-tailed paired t-tests. A p value of < 0.05
was considered statistically significant.
Ethics
This original model was approved by our University’s institutional
Animal Care Committee on July 15, 2004 under protocol # ME-184 and
renewed for this study.
Results
All surgical wounds healed primarily. At sacrifice, no dehiscence
at the site of repair was observed. The mean weight of rabbits at
harvest of the experimental group was not statistically different
from that of 15 non-operated rabbits (3.9 kg (2.6 to 4.7) vs 4.1
kg (2.9 to 4.7) respectively).Early loss of muscle weight was evident one and two weeks after
detachment and immediate reattachment of the SSP muscle compared
with controls (p = 0.004 and p = 0.000 respectively) (Fig. 1). By
six weeks, SSP muscle weights had returned to control values.Bar graph showing muscle weight
one, two and six weeks after detachment and immediate repair of
the supraspinatus (SSP) and in controls. Muscle weights in experimental
shoulders are lower after one and two weeks but restored after six
weeks. *p < 0.05 compared with control; † p < 0.05 compared
with Week 2The results for muscle volume were similar to those for weight,
with mean volume in the experimental group at one week (6.4 ml, p = 0.003) and two weeks (5.9
ml, p < 0.0001) significantly less than the control value (8.0). By
six weeks, SSP muscle volume had returned to control values (p =
0.989).Measurement of i-fat showed early fat accumulation compared with
controls one week (statistically significant (p = 0.005) at mid-part),
two weeks (mid-part (p = 0.001), distal quarter (p = 0.016)), and
six weeks (p = 0.000 at all sites) after detachment and immediate
reattachment of the SSP tendon (Figs 2 and 3). Contrary to muscle
weight and volume, i-fat continued to accumulate six weeks after repair
(Fig. 3). Fat deposition occurred almost exclusively between muscle
bundles. The fat accumulation occurred in an increasing proximal-to-distal
gradient and was statistically significant (p = 0.012 and p = 0.019
respectively) at two
and six weeks (Fig. 3). No gradient was observed in control SSP
muscles.Micrographs of cross-sections at
the mid-part of rabbit supraspinati (SSP); the black staining represents
fat vacuoles within adipocytes called ‘intramuscular fat’ (i-fat).
a) Control specimen. b) Experimental specimen six weeks after detachment
and immediate reattachment of the SSP tendon. I-fat accumulated
between the muscle bundles. Osmium tetroxide; x 25.Bar graph of intramuscular fat (i-fat)
at the proximal quarter, the mid-part and the distal quarter showed
a proximal-to-distal gradient with the greatest accumulation close
to the musculotendinous junction (distal quarter). Control supraspinati
(SSP) did not display this gradient. *p < 0.05 compared with
control; † p < 0.05 compared with distal ‡ p < 0.05 compared
with Week 1; § p < 0.05 compared with Week 2.
Discussion
Our study demonstrates a statistically significant loss of SSP
muscle weight and volume, one and two weeks after immediate repair.
By six weeks, muscle weight and volume had returned to control values.
Our investigation also shows that SSP tendon transection, followed
by an immediate reattachment, leads to early i-fat accumulation.
Compared with controls, there was already more i-fat by one week
in the reattached SSP muscle than in controls. Contrary to muscle
weight and volume, i-fat accumulation did not return to normal levels.
It continued to accumulate to reach a more than twofold increase
at six weeks. I-fat accumulated in a proximal-to-distal gradient.These results confirmed our first hypothesis that both, muscle
atrophy and i-fat accumulation occur very early, one week after
transection of the SSP tendon. Our findings improve on the results
of our previous study from a different group of rabbits,[14] where tendons
detached for durations ranging from four to 12 weeks, caused muscle atrophy
and i-fat accumulation in the SSP muscle and of Rowshan et al[17] who did not detect
any loss of muscle weight nor any increase in i-fat two weeks after
transection of the subscapularis tendon in rabbits. Our results also
demonstrate the ability of the muscle to recover normal weight and
volume after an immediate SSP tendon reattachment, confirming a
beneficial effect of early surgical repair. Late SSP tendon repair
(12 weeks) did not lead to a recovery of muscle atrophy.[7]The current study also confirms our second hypothesis, by identifying
i-fat accumulation in the absence of SSP muscle retraction. SSP
tendon tear causing SSP muscle retraction and fat accumulation has
been documented by us and others.[14,24] Rabbit
SSP tendon transection covered with an inert membrane to prevent
post-operative adhesions, allowed retraction of the SSP muscle and
caused fat accumulation.[14] The
current study contributes new knowledge that fat accumulated, in
spite of an immediate repair, and consequently in the absence of
muscle retraction. The complete tear and repair of the SSP tendon,
in isolation, led to fat accumulation. These results show that despite
the earliest possible repair of a SSP tendon tear, fat accumulation
was not prevented. After repair, fat did not reverse, but rather,
continued to accumulate in the SSP muscle up to six weeks in this
study and up to 12 weeks in a previous study.[7] These experimental
findings correlate with two large clinical follow-up studies that
also failed to detect reversal of fat accumulation after repair
and even showed continued accumulation.[1,2] In
contrast with the recovery of SSP muscle atrophy that benefited
from early repair of the SSP tendon, there appears to be no clinical benefit
to an immediate SSP tendon repair in improving i-fat accumulation.SSP muscle atrophy and muscle fat accumulation show contrasting
features after SSP tendon transection and SSP tendon repair. The
peak muscle weight and volume at one and two weeks contrasted with
the peak i-fat at six weeks. In addition, the reversible muscle
atrophy contrasted with the irreversible i-fat accumulation following its
repair. These experimental data support the possibility that uncoupled
pathophysiological mechanisms may guide muscle loss and fat accumulation.
The contrasting response of SSP muscle and i-fat to tendon tear/repair could
be explained by rapid muscle atrophy when tensile strength is removed
and rapid recovery when anatomic continuity and mechanical tension
are restored.[18] On
the other hand, the trigger for fat accumulation may reside in biological
processes related to tendon-bone healing. At repair, the surgery
does not immediately restore the enthesis’ biologic continuity.
The formation of a new enthesis as measured by cellular counts,
metachromasia of the extracellular matrix and spatial arrangement
of collagen takes more than 24 weeks in rabbits.[25] The very incomplete
enthesis reformation at six weeks could explain the progressing
fat accumulation that we measured in this study and that was observed
clinically.[1,2]Another possibility for i-fat accumulation involves SSP muscle
retraction and damage to the SSN that could be tethered at the level
of the scapular notch.[12,17,21] Such a notch is absent in rabbits
as documented in the study of Crumet et al.[26] Still, the SSN may be stretched
by muscle retraction. However, the current experimental design of immediate
repair prevented SSP muscle retraction. Therefore, fat accumulated
in our model in the absence of both a scapular notch and SSP muscle
retraction. The current study clearly supports the idea that tethering
of the SSN does not constitute a prerequisite for occurrence of
fat accumulation. Our findings confirm those of Gayton et al,[16] who concluded
from their histologic and neurophysiologic study in rabbits that:
“In the rabbit fatty infiltration can occur in the absence of denervation
of the supraspinatus”.[16]The irregular distribution of i-fat[7,9,10] along a proximal-to-distal
gradient[14,27] is reported in
this study at its earliest onset, two weeks after SSP tendon tear
and immediate repair.Clinically, atrophy of the rotator cuff muscles and i-fat accumulation
are disease markers of rotator cuff tendon tears, yet they remain
incompletely characterised. Rotator cuff tears are often treated
surgically, with the goals of re-establishing anatomy, relieving
symptoms, restoring function and reversing muscle atrophy and fat
accumulation. The current study in an animal model of a rotator
cuff tear, suggests that the complications of muscle atrophy and
fat accumulation start as soon as the tear takes place, which is
earlier than previously demonstrated. These complications worsen
with time after onset of the tear. Early timing of surgical repair
can be beneficial in recovering muscle mass and volume. These experiments
showed that i-fat will continue to accumulate, despite a successful
repair, and its presence and intensification do not indicate a failure
of the surgical repair. The differential diagnosis of the etiology
of muscle atrophy and fat accumulation includes a SSN compression
(tethering) or stretch injury. This study demonstrated that both
muscle atrophy and fat accumulation proceeded without any retraction
of the SSP muscle. Therefore, surgeons should not need to investigate patients
with a rotator cuff tear, muscle atrophy and fat accumulation neurophysiologically
for the possibility of SSN neuropathy, nor should they routinely
explore this nerve during reparative surgery.
Limitations
The current results obtained in an animal model cannot readily
be generalised to clinical situations. We and others used surgical
tear models to study fat accumulation and muscle alterations, and
the effects of retraction, delayed repair or suprascapular neuropathy.[14,16-18,27] Could the surgical
tendon repair in isolation have contributed to the fat accumulation?
This is not known since neither we nor previous investigators compared
data with a sham surgery in an unoperated animal.[16-19] However, SSP tendon tear repair,
rather than just a surgical intervention, may constitute a likely
reason for the SSP i-fat accumulation for a number of reasons: the
amount of fat accumulation in this study is proportional to results
of our publications with tear, retraction and delayed repair[14,27]; we found no published
evidence of SSP muscle fat accumulation after surgical repair of
non-SSP-related shoulder conditions neither in animal models nor
clinically e.g. in capsuloplasty or labral repair; and a spontaneous
SSP tendon tear has been clinically documented to cause fat accumulation
in the SSP muscle without shoulder surgery.[15]
Conclusion
Our data confirm that both muscle atrophy and i-fat accumulation
occur in SSP muscles within one week of a SSP tendon tear. Muscle
atrophy recovered six weeks after repair but not i-fat accumulation.
These changes happened in the absence of muscle retraction.Acknowledgements: We thank J. Courchesne and P.
Poitras for the surgeries, Y. Nie for tissue processing, M. Aubé
for intramuscular fat measurement and G. Baker for editing.
Authors: Struan H Coleman; Stephen Fealy; John R Ehteshami; John D MacGillivray; David W Altchek; Russell F Warren; A Simon Turner Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Christian Gerber; Dominik C Meyer; Eric Frey; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Hans Hoppeler; Robert Frigg; Bernhard Jost; Matthias A Zumstein Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2008-12-18 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: J Christopher Gayton; L Joseph Rubino; Mark M Rich; Mark H Stouffer; Qingbo Wang; Gregory P Boivin Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Amil Sahai; Derek L Jones; Marcus Hughes; Alex Pu; Katrina Williams; Shama R Iyer; Chozha Rathinam; Derik L Davis; Richard M Lovering; Mohit N Gilotra Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 3.102
Authors: Ana P Valencia; Jim K Lai; Shama R Iyer; Katherine L Mistretta; Espen E Spangenburg; Derik L Davis; Richard M Lovering; Mohit N Gilotra Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Derik L Davis; Ranyah Almardawi; R Frank Henn; Jiachen Zhuo; Michael E Mulligan; Charles S Resnik; Selwan B Abdullah; Hussain Al Khalifah; Mohit N Gilotra; S Ashfaq Hasan; Rao P Gullapalli Journal: Curr Probl Diagn Radiol Date: 2020-06-26
Authors: Severin Ruoss; Philipp Kindt; Linus Oberholzer; Marco Rohner; Ladina Jungck; Sara Abdel-Aziz; Daniel Fitze; Andrea B Rosskopf; Karina Klein; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Christian Gerber; Karl Wieser; Martin Flück Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2018-11
Authors: Isabella T Wu; Michael C Gibbons; Mary C Esparza; Laura S Vasquez-Bolanos; Sydnee A Hyman; Shanelle N Dorn; Anshuman Singh; John G Lane; Donald C Fithian; Severin Ruoss; Samuel R Ward Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 4.566