| Literature DB >> 24743542 |
Lucja A Labuda1, Sanne E de Jong2, Lynn Meurs3, Abena S Amoah4, Moustapha Mbow5, Ulysse Ateba-Ngoa1, Alwin J van der Ham6, André C Knulst7, Maria Yazdanbakhsh6, Ayola A Adegnika1.
Abstract
Although differences in immunological responses between populations have been found in terms of vaccine efficacy, immune responses to infections and prevalence of chronic inflammatory diseases, the mechanisms responsible for these differences are not well understood. Therefore, innate cytokine responses mediated by various classes of pattern-recognition receptors including Toll-like receptors (TLR), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs) and nucleotide-binding oligomerisation domain-like receptors (NLRs) were compared between Dutch (European), semi-urban and rural Gabonese (African) children. Whole blood was stimulated for 24 hours and the pro-inflammatory tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and the anti-inflammatory/regulatory interleukin-10 (IL-10) cytokines in culture supernatant were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Gabonese children had a lower pro-inflammatory response to poly(I:C) (TLR3 ligand), but a higher pro-inflammatory response to FSL-1 (TLR2/6 ligand), Pam3 (TLR2/1 ligand) and LPS (TLR4 ligand) compared to Dutch children. Anti-inflammatory responses to Pam3 were also higher in Gabonese children. Non-TLR ligands did not induce substantial cytokine production on their own. Interaction between various TLR and non-TLR receptors was further assessed, but no differences were found between the three populations. In conclusion, using a field applicable assay, significant differences were observed in cytokine responses between European and African children to TLR ligands, but not to non-TLR ligands.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24743542 PMCID: PMC3990610 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095241
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Ligands used in the study, their receptors and adapters.
| Ligand | PRR | TLR adapter |
| Poly(I:C) | TLR3 | TRIF |
| FSL-1 | TLR2/6 | MyD88 |
| Pam3 | TLR2/1 | MyD88 |
| LPS | TLR4 | MyD88, TRIF |
| iE-DAP | NLR: NOD1 | - |
| KOdiA-PC | CD36/SR-B2 | - |
| mannan | CLR: MR, DC-SIGN | - |
| curdlan | CLR: Dectin-1 | - |
PRR, pattern-recognition receptor. TLR, toll-like receptor. NLR, NOD-like receptor. NOD, nucleotide-binding oligomerisation domain-containing protein 1. SR, scavenger receptor. CLR, C-type lectin receptor. MR, mannose receptor. DC-SIGN, dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin. TRIF, TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β. MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88.
Figure 1Whole blood cytokine responses to TLR ligands.
A) TNF responses to poly(I:C), FLS-1, Pam3 and LPS in European children (the Netherlands), and semi-urban and rural African children (Gabon). B) IL-10 responses to TLR stimulation. C) Pro/anti-inflammatory ratio as calculated by TNF/IL-10 ratio. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Degree of interaction between TLR and non-TLR ligands in Dutch children.
| TNF | IL-10 | |||||||
| poly(I:C) | FSL-1 | Pam3 | LPS | poly(I:C) | FSL-1 | Pam3 | LPS | |
| iE-DAP | ++ | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| mannan | + | + | + | + | + | |||
| KOdiA-PC | − | + | ||||||
| curdlan | ++ | ++ | ++ | − | − | |||
The degree of interaction between two ligands was calculated for e.g. poly(I:C) and iE-DAP by: (TNFpoly(I:C)+iE-DAP − TNFmedium)/((TNFpoly(I:C) − TNFmedium) + (TNFiE-DAP − TNFmedium)). Values above 1 are regarded as synergy (+), and above 2 as strong synergy (++). Values below 1 are regarded as inhibition (−). Shown are statistically significant differences (p<0.05) according to the Wilcoxon signed rank test, when comparing the response to combined stimulation with the sum of separate stimulation (after background subtraction). See Supplementary figure 3 for details.
Figure 2Degree of interaction between TLR and non-TLR ligands.
A) Degree of interaction for TNF production upon stimulation with poly(I:C), FSL-1, Pam3 or LPS combined with iE-DAP. This was calculated for e.g. poly(I:C) and iE-DAP by: (TNFpoly(I:C)+iE-DAP − TNFmedium)((TNFpoly(I:C) − TNFmedium) + (TNFiE-DAP − TNFmedium)). B) Degree of interaction for IL-10 production for combinations with iE-DAP. C) Degree of interaction for TNF production for combinations with mannan. D) Degree of interaction for IL-10 production for combinations with mannan.