Jeanne E Savage1, Briana Mezuk2. 1. Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States. Electronic address: savagej@vcu.edu. 2. Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States; Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Division of Epidemiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States; Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Wolverine, MI, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the U.S., Latino and Asian American immigrants and ethnic minorities may be at increased risk for alcohol and drug use disorders (AUDs/DUDs). The role of psychosocial and contextual characteristics as potential factors underlying this increased risk is unresolved. METHODS: Participants include 4649 adults from the National Latino and Asian American Study. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between acculturation, acculturative stress, neighborhood characteristics, family characteristics, and discrimination and AUDs/DUDs. Models were stratified by age of immigration and ethnicity and controlled for demographic and mental health characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 9.6% of Latino and 4.1% of Asian participants met criteria for lifetime AUDs/DUDs. Acculturation, family conflict, and discrimination were positively associated with AUDs/DUDs (odds ratios [ORs] and 95% confidence intervals [95%CIs]: 1.80[1.54-2.09], 1.24[1.12-1.36], and 1.54[1.38-1.73]), while neighborhood safety and family cohesion were protective for AUDs/DUDs (ORs[95%CIs]: 0.75[0.66-0.85] and 0.79[0.69-0.90]). Acculturative stress and neighborhood cohesion were not related to AUDs/DUDs. The relationships between family conflict and family cohesion with AUDs/DUDs were attenuated after accounting for other psychosocial and contextual factors. These relationships were generally consistent across ethnic and age of immigration subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Factors such as acculturation, discrimination, and neighborhood safety, are robustly and largely universally related to AUDs/DUDs among first and later generation Latino and Asian immigrants. Further research is required to understand how and why these factors relate to risk of substance misuse, and to identify ways to apply these factors in prevention and intervention efforts.
BACKGROUND: In the U.S., Latino and Asian American immigrants and ethnic minorities may be at increased risk for alcohol and drug use disorders (AUDs/DUDs). The role of psychosocial and contextual characteristics as potential factors underlying this increased risk is unresolved. METHODS:Participants include 4649 adults from the National Latino and Asian American Study. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between acculturation, acculturative stress, neighborhood characteristics, family characteristics, and discrimination and AUDs/DUDs. Models were stratified by age of immigration and ethnicity and controlled for demographic and mental health characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 9.6% of Latino and 4.1% of Asian participants met criteria for lifetime AUDs/DUDs. Acculturation, family conflict, and discrimination were positively associated with AUDs/DUDs (odds ratios [ORs] and 95% confidence intervals [95%CIs]: 1.80[1.54-2.09], 1.24[1.12-1.36], and 1.54[1.38-1.73]), while neighborhood safety and family cohesion were protective for AUDs/DUDs (ORs[95%CIs]: 0.75[0.66-0.85] and 0.79[0.69-0.90]). Acculturative stress and neighborhood cohesion were not related to AUDs/DUDs. The relationships between family conflict and family cohesion with AUDs/DUDs were attenuated after accounting for other psychosocial and contextual factors. These relationships were generally consistent across ethnic and age of immigration subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Factors such as acculturation, discrimination, and neighborhood safety, are robustly and largely universally related to AUDs/DUDs among first and later generation Latino and Asian immigrants. Further research is required to understand how and why these factors relate to risk of substance misuse, and to identify ways to apply these factors in prevention and intervention efforts.
Authors: Joel Swendsen; Kevin P Conway; Louisa Degenhardt; Meyer Glantz; Robert Jin; Kathleen R Merikangas; Nancy Sampson; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Addiction Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Steven G Heeringa; James Wagner; Myriam Torres; Naihua Duan; Terry Adams; Patricia Berglund Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Michael Harrington; Jennifer Robinson; Shay-Lee Bolton; Jitender Sareen; James Bolton Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Josep Maria Haro; Saena Arbabzadeh-Bouchez; Traolach S Brugha; Giovanni de Girolamo; Margaret E Guyer; Robert Jin; Jean Pierre Lepine; Fausto Mazzi; Blanca Reneses; Gemma Vilagut; Nancy A Sampson; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2006 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Michael A Mancini; Christopher P Salas-Wright; Michael G Vaughn Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Annahir N Cariello; Paul B Perrin; Chelsea Derlan Williams; G Antonio Espinoza; Alejandra Morlett-Paredes; Oswaldo A Moreno; Michael A Trujillo Journal: Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol Date: 2019-09-26
Authors: Ana P Martinez-Donate; Xiao Zhang; M Gudelia Rangel; Melbourne F Hovell; J Eduardo Gonzalez-Fagoaga; Carlos Magis-Rodriguez; Sylvia Guendelman Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2017-08-24
Authors: Jeremy C Kane; Renee M Johnson; Courtland Robinson; David H Jernigan; Tracy W Harachi; Judith K Bass Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 2.826