Literature DB >> 24742740

Conventional stents versus stents loaded with (125)iodine seeds for the treatment of unresectable oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial.

Hai-Dong Zhu1, Jin-He Guo1, Ai-Wu Mao2, Wei-Fu Lv3, Jian-Song Ji4, Wen-Hui Wang5, Bin Lv6, Rui-Min Yang7, Wei Wu8, Cai-Fang Ni9, Jie Min10, Guang-Yu Zhu1, Li Chen1, Mei-Ling Zhu11, Zhen-Yu Dai12, Peng-Fei Liu13, Jian-Ping Gu14, Wei-Xin Ren15, Rui-Hua Shi16, Gao-Feng Xu17, Shi-Cheng He1, Gang Deng1, Gao-Jun Teng18.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The combination of stent insertion and single high-dose brachytherapy is a feasible and safe palliative treatment regimen in patients with unresectable oesophageal cancer. We aimed to further assess the efficacy of this treatment strategy compared to a conventional covered stent in patients with dysphagia caused by unresectable oesophageal cancer.
METHODS: In this multicentre, single-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients with unresectable oesophageal cancer from 16 hospitals in China. We included adult patients (aged ≥ 20 years) with progressive dysphagia, unresectable tumours due to extensive lesions, metastases, or poor medical condition, and with clear consciousness, cooperation, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0-3. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (in 1:1 ratio, no stratification) to receive either a stent loaded with (125)iodine radioactive seeds (irradiation group) or a conventional oesophageal stent (control group). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Survival analyses were done in a modified intention-to-treat group. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01054274.
FINDINGS: Between Nov 1, 2009, and Oct 31, 2012, 160 patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either an irradiation stent (n=80) or a conventional stent (n=80). During a median follow-up of 138 days (IQR 72-207), 148 stents (73 in the irradiation group and 75 in the control group) were successfully placed into the diseased oesophagus in 148 participants. Median overall survival was 177 days (95% CI 153-201) in the irradiation group versus 147 days (124-170) in the control group (p=0.0046). Major complications and side-effects of the treatment were severe chest pain (17 [23%] of 73 patients in the irradiation group vs 15 [20%] of 75 patents in the control group), fistula formation (six [8%] vs five [7%]), aspiration pneumonia (11 [15%] vs 14 [19%]), haemorrhage (five [7%] vs five [7%]), and recurrent dysphagia (21 [28%] vs 20 [27%]).
INTERPRETATION: In patients with unresectable oesophageal cancer, the insertion of an oesophageal stent loaded with (125)iodine seeds prolonged survival when compared with the insertion of a conventional covered self-expandable metallic stent.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24742740     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70131-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  38 in total

1.  Application of chemokine receptor antagonist with stents reduces local inflammation and suppresses cancer growth.

Authors:  Ai-Wu Mao; Ting-Hui Jiang; Xian-Jun Sun; Jian Peng
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-06-05

2.  High dose-rate endoluminal brachytherapy for primary and recurrent esophageal cancer : Experience from a large single-center cohort.

Authors:  Nils H Nicolay; Johanna Rademacher; Jan Oelmann-Avendano; Jürgen Debus; Peter E Huber; Katja Lindel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Safety implications of oesophageal stents used for the palliation of dysphagia in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal malignancy-authors' reply.

Authors:  Vinayak Nagaraja; Michael R Cox; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-08

Review 4.  Treatment for unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer: current evidence and trends.

Authors:  Peter S N van Rossum; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Frank P Vleggaar; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  History of the Use of Esophageal Stent in Management of Dysphagia and Its Improvement Over the Years.

Authors:  Kulwinder S Dua
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 6.  Interventional Therapy of Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Aiwu Mao
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2016-08-27

7.  GDF15 derived from both tumor-associated macrophages and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas contributes to tumor progression via Akt and Erk pathways.

Authors:  Naoki Urakawa; Soken Utsunomiya; Mari Nishio; Manabu Shigeoka; Nobuhisa Takase; Noriaki Arai; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Yu-ichiro Koma; Hiroshi Yokozaki
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 8.  Recent Updates in Gastrointestinal Stent Placement from the Esophagus to the Colon: A Radiological Perspective.

Authors:  Gun Ha Kim; Ji Hoon Shin; Chu Hui Zeng; Jung Hoon Park
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 9.  Role of Esophageal Metal Stents Placement and Combination Therapy in Inoperable Esophageal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Lai; Seth Lipka; Ambuj Kumar; Sajiv Sethi; David Bromberg; Nanxing Li; Huafeng Shen; Lilia Stefaniwsky; Patrick Brady
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  Endoscopic Full-Thickness Defects and Closure Techniques.

Authors:  Diogo T H de Moura; Amit H Sachdev; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.